| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| ☑ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
| ☑ | No fee required. |
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| ☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| A Letter from the CEO |  |
Juan R. Luciano B O A R D C H A I R A N D C E O | Dear Stockholders, ADM’s 2023 performance continued to demonstrate the strength of our business fundamentals and the overall effectiveness of our strategy. Over the last decade, we’ve extended our value chain and broadened our portfolio of businesses, building a more resilient ADM that is able to deliver strong results even in challenging operating environments. In 2023, we delivered adjusted earnings per share of $6.98 and trailing 4Q average adjusted return on invested capital of 12.2%, all while returning $3.7 billion to shareholders via dividends and share repurchases. Throughout the year, our 42,000 colleagues around the globe continued to advance strategic initiatives that are serving our customers’ evolving needs, from launching regenerative agriculture in South America and Europe, to commissioning our joint venture oilseed facility in North Dakota, to expanding our starch capacity to serve customer needs across food and industrial products. We also continue to drive a path to decarbonization that not only accelerates ADM’s Strive 35 efforts, but also supports our customers’ growing need for low-carbon solutions. Now, as we advance through 2024, we are focused on continuing to build a stronger ADM for the future, executing strategic initiatives that provide strong growth prospects while remaining firmly committed to our productivity efforts to drive efficiencies, cost savings and cash generation. Safety is core to ADM’s culture, but our track record for continuous progress suffered a setback in 2023. We remain committed to safety as our highest priority, and we are taking an array of aggressive actions to make sure our future performance returns to the positive trajectory we’ve seen in the past. Part of building a better ADM is ensuring we take every measure to improve performance where needed, including simplification and optimization within our Nutrition business and a continued strong focus on our manufacturing footprint to ensure we are meeting customer needs effectively, efficiently, and, most of all, safely. Our purpose – to unlock the power of nature to enrich the quality of life – continues to drive our work and our path forward, and I know that ADM will continue to play its vital role, acting with the highest levels of integrity as we meet vital needs spanning food security, health and well-being and sustainability. Sincerely yours,
Juan R. Luciano Board Chair, CEO and President | |||
“We are focused on continuing to build a stronger ADM for the future.” Juan Luciano | ||||
| 2023 in Review |  |
Creating Value
for Customers and Shareholders
Raised quarterly dividend by 11%; 51 consecutive years of dividend increases | $3.7B returned to shareholders via dividends & share repurchases | Announced up to $2B in additional share repurchases, including $1B in accelerated share repurchase program | ||
Opened Green Bison soybean facility | Expanded regenerative agriculture initiatives globally | Completed Marshall starch expansion | ||
A
The Letter from the CEO Juan R. Luciano CHAIRMAN AND CEO "Our innovation, partnerships and investments position us for long-term leadership in vast and fast-growing growth segments. Juan Luciano Dear Stockholders, 2021 was a watershed year for ADM. We delivered the highest earnings in our almost 120-year history, with excellent performance across the company. And we advanced into the next phase of our strategic plan, paving the way for continued growth in the years to come. Our accomplishments from the year - many of which you can see following this note - range from outstanding financial results to strategic growth investments to new, innovative ways in which we're leading in sustainability and decarbonization. And each one of those accomplishments can be tied to the continued, successful implementation of our strategy. Over the last decade, we've built a better ADM and repositioned our portfolio to align with the enduring global trends of food security, health and well-being, and sustainability. Today, thanks to that transformation, we're delivering stronger returns, higher margins, less earnings volatility - and we've done all of this while maintaining our strong balance sheet and continuing to distribute value to shareholders. Now we're moving to the next evolution of our strategy, focusing on Productivity, including our continued initiatives to build a better company, and Innovation, which encompasses our plans for growth and margin expansion. This work represents the foundation of the next horizon of our strategic plan and our optimistic view of our near-term future. We believe that the benefits from Productivity and Innovation should more than offset market forces such as inflation, allowing ADM to target our next earnings milestone of $6.00 to $7.00 per share by 2025. Even more importantly, we see significant upside potential as we look ahead. Our innovation, partnerships and investments position us for long-term leadership in vast and fast-growing segments that could push us to the higher side of our earnings target milestone, and which will continue to power growth beyond 2025. As this letter is being written, the images and effects of the conflict in Ukraine are reverberating around the world. We condemn this unprovoked attack, which threatens the people and sovereignty of Ukraine, as well as the global food supply chain. Were excited and confident in our plan and our future, and were committed to continuing to share our success with our shareholders. ADM has a record of more than 40 years of annual dividend growth, and we were pleased to have increased our quarterly dividend by 8% this year.
"We're executing our plan for a better future. There has never been a more exciting time for ADM." Juan Luciano We're excited and confident in our plan and our future, and we're committed to continuing to share our success with our shareholders. ADM has a record of more than 40 years of annual dividend growth, and we were pleased to have increased our quarterly dividend by 8% this year. Our highest priority remains the safety and health of our 40,000 colleagues around the globe. A year ago, we hoped the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic was behind us, but that wasn't the case. I'm proud of our team for continuing to serve customers while managing through the pandemic. We continued to operate with no major COVID-related interruptions, and in doing so, played our important role in protecting the global food system. We also saw significant improvements in our on-the-job safety metrics in 2021. Of course, when it comes to safety, the only thing to do after a good year is focus on an even better year, which is exactly what we are doing in 2022. All of these accomplishments are driven by our culture and our purpose. ADM has foundational culture of execution and innovation. We do what we say we will do, with a focus on constantly improving. And we're committed to living our purpose: unlocking the power of nature to enrich the quality of life. That's why, for us, it's important both that we delivered record financial results in 2021, and that we delivered 432 million meals to people in need. We're proud when we're recognized for exciting new products like our BPL1 probiotic strain, and when we achieved a perfect 100 score on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation's 2022 Corporate Equality Index. We're excited about scaling up our investments to meet customer needs around the globe, and scaling up our plans to reduce Scope 3 emissions and eliminate deforestation from our supply chain. I'm proud of what we've accomplished, and grateful for our teams around the globe. We delivered a remarkable 2021. And now, from advancing gender parity in our leadership ranks, to reducing the environmental impact of our operations, to finding new and innovative ways to feed the world, we're executing our plan for a better future. There has never been a more exciting time for ADM. Sincerely yours, Juan Luciano Chairman, CEO and President 432 million meals delivered to people in need Our primary focus is protecting and supporting our 630 Ukrainian colleagues, who are being subjected to increasingly indiscriminate attacks on civilian areas. Our efforts started even before the conflict began and are continuing on numerous fronts. Were also assisting the people of Ukraine more widely, committing millions in monetary and other support, and using our logistical networks and expertise to help support farmers and distribute emergency food rations. In addition, we have made the decision to scale down ADM operations in Russia that are not related to the production and transport of essential food commodities and ingredients. We remain committed to doing what is right, including preventing further suffering by continuing to play our critical role in ensuring all people have access to the fundamental nutrition they need. Looking back, despite the emergence of the Delta and Omicron COVID-19 variants in 2021, we continued to operate with no major COVID-related interruptions, serving our customers and
Transformation Delivered: 2021 in Review Financial Highlights Record Adjusted Earnings Per Share $5.19 Up 45% year over year Strength Across the Enterprise Record Adjusted Segment Operating Profit $4.8B Up 38% year over year Adjusted ROIC 10% Adjusted EBITDA $4.9B Ag Services & Oilseeds Operating Profit ~$2.8B Carbohdyrate Solutions Operating Profit ~$1.3B Nutrition Operating Profit ~$700M Strategic Transformation $100M in new annualized Biosolutions revenue Spiritwood/Marathon JV and offtake agreement Sustainable Aviation Fuel initiative PetDine investment Sojaprotein acquisition Deerland acquisition FISA acquisition Switzerland animal nutrition lab Pinghu flavor facility Singapore plant-based lab Partnering for Innovation Farmers Business Network Future Meat Technologies LG Chem Temasek Acies Bio Vland Leading the Industry Fortune Most Admired Fortune Change the World Ethisphere World's Most Ethical Company Business Intelligence Group Innovation Award 3BL 100 Best Corporate Citizens NutraIngredients, Editor's Award for Functional Food Innovation NutraIngredients, Ingredient of the Year Living our Purpose Corn footprint decarbonization initiative Carbon neutral milling Zero-deforestation goal Scope 3 emissions goal Genesis Consortium NET Power collaboration 650,000 farmers in sustainable agricultural programs * The Financial Highlights above refer to non-GAAP, or "adjusted,"“adjusted,” financial measures that exclude certain items from the comparable GAAP measure. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP items to GAAP, please refer to Annex A to our proxy statement and beginning on page 34 of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K.statement.
| A Letter from the Lead Director | |
Terrell K. Crews L E A D D I R E C T O R | Dear Shareholders, Serving as your Lead Independent Director is a great privilege, made possible by the trust you have instilled in the Board as stewards of your capital and of our company. My fellow directors and I recognize the important responsibility we have to you, and we appreciate your investment and belief in ADM as we continue working on your behalf. Continued Financial Execution I’m pleased to report that despite a volatile market environment, ADM delivered strong results in 2023, speaking to the resilience of ADM’s business and its unparalleled global footprint and capabilities. To support our value creation efforts, the Board, in close coordination with management, remains laser-focused on our 2024 strategic priorities of driving operational excellence across all segments, executing cost discipline and maintaining the highest standards of ethics and safety. Strong Corporate Governance ADM is governed by a highly engaged and diverse group of directors with deep expertise in and experience across areas critical to the company’s operation. Core to our success as a Board is our ability to effectively chart the overall trajectory of the company. We have added four new directors to the Board over the last five-year period to ensure we have the right mix of skills, experience and new perspectives to guide the company forward. Throughout 2023, we regularly engaged with management on critical areas such as strategic investments, returning value to shareholders, capital allocation, succession planning, safety and compliance. We are acutely aware of our responsibility as an independent governing body and remain committed to driving shareholder value with integrity and transparency. Earlier this year, ADM’s Board acted decisively and transparently while conducting its Audit Committee-led investigation. Strong leadership practices and true director independence are important stalwarts of good governance. We take this responsibility seriously and are committed to demonstrating leadership and accountability in all aspects of our role. Looking Ahead We are grateful for our engagement meetings with shareholders, which always provide valuable feedback that continues to inform our Board priorities and governance practices. Looking ahead, we remain confident that ADM is well positioned to deliver long-term value for our shareholders, customers and employees. Thank you for your investment and continued support. Sincerely yours,
Terrell K. Crews Lead Director | |||
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY
77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601
Notice of Annual Meeting
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
To All Stockholders:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, a Delaware corporation, will be held at the Iridium Room on the first floor of ADM’s Global Headquarters located at 77 W. Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60601, on Thursday, May 5, 2022,23, 2024, commencing at 8:3000 A.M. Central Daylight Time. The annual meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. You may attend the online meeting, submit questions, and vote your shares electronically during the meeting via the internet by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2024. To enter the annual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number that is printed on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. We recommend that you log in at least 15 minutes before the meeting to ensure that you are logged in when the meeting starts. Online check-in will start shortly before the meeting on May 23, 2024.
| Date and Time | Location | Record Date | ||||||
 |  |  | ||||||
Thursday, May 23, 2024 8:00AM CDT | Virtual Meeting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2024 | Thursday, April 4, 2024 | ||||||
Items to Be Voted On
At the annual meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote on the following matters:
ITEM | PAGE REFERENCE | VOTING RECOMMENDATION | |||||||||||
1. |
8 |
FOR | |||||||||||
2. | To consider an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers; | 33 | FOR | ||||||||||
3. |
78 |
FOR | |||||||||||
4. | To consider and act upon a stockholder proposal regarding an independent board chairman; and |
82 |
AGAINST | ||||||||||
5. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. | ||||||||||||
How to Vote
| Internet |
| Call | Virtual Meeting | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vote using your smartphone or computer | Call the | Complete, sign and | Vote online during the meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
 |
REGINA B. JONES, CORPORATE SECRETARY April 10, 2024 |
March 22, 2022
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY www.proxyvote.com |
 | We encourage our shareholders to enroll in voluntary e-delivery for future proxy materials. Electronic delivery is convenient and provides immediate access to these materials. This will help us save printing and mailing expenses and reduce our impact on the environment. Follow the simple instructions at www.proxyvote.com. |
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement contains forward-looking information“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that isinvolve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this proxy statement, are forward-looking statements. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “outlook,” “will,” “should,” “can have,” “likely,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. For example, all statements the Company makes relating to its future results and operations, growth opportunities, pending litigation and investigations, and timing of the remediation of the Company’s material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to certainsignificant risks, uncertainties, and uncertaintieschanges in circumstances that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those projected, expressed, or implied by suchthe forward-looking information. Risksstatements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, assumptions, and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discusseddescribed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” included in ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as may be updated in our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. To Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated or anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except to the extent permitted under applicablerequired by law, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company assumes nodoes not undertake, and expressly disclaims, any duty or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statementsstatement whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, or future events.
| |||||
| |||||
Table of Contents
Proxy Summary
The following is a summary of certain key disclosures in this proxy statement. This is only a summary, and it may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For more complete information, please review this proxy statement in its entirety as well as our 20212023 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As used in this proxy statement, “ADM” or the “Company” refers to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. The information contained on adm.com or any other website referred to in this proxy statement is provided for reference only and is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
General Information
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
| Date and Time | Location | Record Date | ||||||
| | | ||||||
Thursday, May 23, 2024 8:00AM CDT | Virtual Meeting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2024 | Thursday, April 4, 2024 | ||||||
General Information
Meeting: Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date: Thursday, May 5, 2022
Time: 8:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Location: The Iridium Room on the first floor of ADM’s Global Headquarters located at 77 W. Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60601
Record Date: March 14, 2022
Stock Symbol: ADM
Exchange: NYSE
Common Stock Outstanding: 562,477,478 501,763,545 as of March 14, 2022April 4, 2024
Registrar & Transfer Agent: Hickory Point Bank and Trust, fsb
State of Incorporation: Delaware
Corporate Headquarters and Principal Executive Office:
77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600,
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Corporate Website: www.adm.com
ITEMS TO BE VOTED ON | PAGE REFERENCE | VOTING RECOMMENDATION | |||||||||||
1. | 8 | FOR | |||||||||||
2. | 33 | FOR | |||||||||||
3. | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) | 78
|
FOR | ||||||||||
4. | 82 | AGAINST | |||||||||||
Meet the Nominees
 |  |  |  |  |  | |||||
| Michael S. Burke | Theodore Colbert | James C. Collins, Jr. | Terrell K. Crews | Ellen de Brabander | Suzan F. Harrison | |||||
 |  |  |  |  | ||||
| Juan R. Luciano | Patrick J. Moore | Debra A. Sandler | Lei Z. Schlitz | Kelvin R. Westbrook | ||||
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 1 |
 | PROXY SUMMARY — Governance Highlights |
Executive Compensation
CEO: Juan R. Luciano
CEO 2021 Total Direct Compensation:
• Salary: $1,400,004
• Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation: $5,320,000
• Long-Term Incentives: $15,939,571
CEO Employment Agreement: No
Change in Control Agreement: No
Stock Ownership Guidelines: Yes
Anti-Hedging Policy: Yes
Items to Be Voted On
• Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
• Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)
• Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
• Stockholder Proposals
CEO: Juan R. Luciano CEO 2023 Total Direct Compensation: • Salary: $1,482,918 • Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation: $3,609,611 • Long-Term Incentives: $17,919,686 CEO Employment Agreement: No Change in Control Agreement: No Stock Ownership Guidelines: Yes Anti-Hedging Policy: Yes | Compensation Highlights | |||
Modest base salary changes for most NEOs: NEO salaries were increased 2% to 4% | ||||
Earned incentives for NEOs on strong company performance: Earned annual incentive between 95.9% and 120.9% of target | ||||
Earned LTI for long-term results: Earned awards were 100% of target | ||||
Corporate Governance
Director Nominees:11
| • | Michael S. Burke (Independent) |
| • | Theodore Colbert (Independent) |
| • | James C. Collins, Jr. (Independent) |
| • | Terrell K. Crews (Independent) |
| • | Ellen de Brabander (Independent) |
| • | Suzan F. Harrison (Independent) |
| • | Juan R. Luciano |
| • | Patrick J. Moore (Independent) |
| • | Debra A. Sandler (Independent) |
| • | Lei Z. Schlitz (Independent) |
| • | Kelvin R. Westbrook (Independent) |
• Michael S. Burke (Independent)
• Theodore Colbert (Independent)
• Terrell K. Crews (Independent)
• Donald E. Felsinger (Independent)
• Suzan F. Harrison (Independent)
• Juan R. Luciano
• Patrick J. Moore (Independent)
• Francisco J. Sanchez (Independent)
• Debra A. Sandler (Independent)
• Lei Z. Schlitz (Independent)
• Kelvin R. Westbrook (Independent)
Director Term: One year
Director Election Standard: Majority voting standard for uncontested elections
Board Meetings in 2021: 82023: 7
Board Committee Meetings in 2021:2023:
| • | Audit – 9 |
| • | Compensation and Succession – 4 |
| • | Nominating and Corporate Governance – 4 |
| • | Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility – 4 |
• Audit – 9
• Compensation and Succession – 4
• Nominating and Corporate Governance – 4
• Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility – 4
Supermajority Voting Requirements: No
Stockholder Rights Plan: No
Proxy Summary
Governance Highlights
The Board of Directors views itselfplays a critical role as the long-term stewards of ADM. The Board is committed to enhancing the success and value of our companyCompany for its stockholders, as well as for other stakeholders such as employees, business partners, and communities. The Board recognizes the importance of good corporate governance and understands that transparent disclosure of its governance practices helps stockholders assess the quality of our companyCompany and its management and the value of their investment decisions.
ADM’s corporate governance practices are intended to ensure independence, transparency, management accountability, effective decision making, and appropriate monitoring of compliance and performance. We believe that these strong corporate governance practices, together with our enduring corporate values and ethics, are critical to providing lasting value to the stockholders of our company.Company.
We use majority voting for uncontested director elections and plurality voting for contested director elections. | 10 of 11 of our director nominees are independent and only independent directors serve on the Audit, Compensation and | ||||
We have an independent Lead Director, selected by the independent directors. The Lead Director provides the Board with independent leadership, facilitates the Board’s independence from management, and has broad powers as described on page 21. | Our independent directors meet in executive session at each regular | ||||
We have policies prohibiting directors and officers from trading in derivative securities of our | Significant stock ownership requirements are in place for directors and executive officers. | ||||
The Board and each standing committee annually conduct evaluations of their performance. Directors annually evaluate each other, and these evaluations are used to assess future re-nominations to the Board. | Individuals cannot stand for election as a director once they reach age 75, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines set limits on the number of public company boards on which a director can serve. | ||||
Holders of 10% or more of our common stock have the ability to call a special meeting of stockholders. | Our bylaws include a proxy access provision under which a stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders that has owned at least 3% of our common stock for at least 3 years may submit nominees for up to 20% of the board seats for inclusion in our proxy statement. | ||||
Our Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee provides Board-level oversight of environmental, corporate social responsibility, diversity, safety, and | We Ethisphere for five years running. | ||||
| 2 | | ADM Proxy Statement |
| PROXY SUMMARY — Voting Matters and Board Recommendations |
Proxy Summary
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Proposal | Board Voting Recommendation | Page Reference | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Proposal No. | FOR | |||||||||||
Proposal No. 2—Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation | FOR | 33 | ||||||||||
Proposal No. | FOR | |||||||||||
Proposal No. 4—Stockholder Proposal – Independent Board Chairman | AGAINST | 82 | ||||||||||
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 3 |
| ||||
Director Nominee Qualifications, Skills, and Experience
The following chart provides summary information about each of our director nominees’ qualifications, skills, and experiences.experience. More detailed information is provided in each director nominee’s biography beginning on page 8.9.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEO Leadership CEO experience at a large public company. | · | · | · | · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance / Accounting Experience in positions requiring financial knowledge and analysis or overseeing internal controls and reporting of public company financial and operating results, including as chief financial officer and/or in accounting, corporate finance, or treasury functions. | · | · | · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Business Experience working outside the U.S. or overseeing a global business. | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agriculture / Food / Retail Consumer Experience in agriculture, food, or retail consumer businesses or industries. | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M&A Experience implementing growth strategies, establishing partnerships, identifying opportunities, and analyzing cultural and strategic fit in connection with mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and other strategic transactions. | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk Management Experience assessing and reviewing material risk exposures and the measures to manage and mitigate material risks, including in the areas of operations, health and safety, climate change, cybersecurity, and regulatory. | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainability / Environmental / Social Experience overseeing environmental impact, corporate social responsibility, or sustainability strategies or initiatives. | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales / Marketing Experience involving branding, marketing, and sales at a global scale and in key markets. | · | · | · | · | · | · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project Management Experience overseeing or managing large or complex projects, including in the areas of manufacturing, supply chain, logistics, engineering, construction, and M&A integration. | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food Science / R&D Experience in scientific or research roles, particularly in agricultural or food science. | · | · | · | · | · | · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Information Technology / Cybersecurity Experience in positions requiring information technology knowledge or overseeing information technology functions, including data management and cybersecurity. | · | · | · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four of our director nominees (Messrs. Crews, Moore, and Westbrook and Ms. Harrison) have earned recognition as part of the NACD Directorship 100™ from the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), a leading independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to enhancing corporate governance to drive economic opportunity and positive change in business and the communities they serve. The annual NACD Directorship 100™ celebrates and recognizes the most influential directors and leaders in the corporate governance community who have demonstrated excellence in the boardroom through innovation, courage, and integrity.
| 4 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PROXY SUMMARY — Director Nominee Diversity, Age, Tenure, and Independence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proxy Summary
Director Nominee Diversity, Age, Tenure, and Independence
Director Nominee Diversity, Age, Tenure, and Independence
The following charts provide information about our director nominees’ personal characteristics, including race/ethnicity, gender, and age, as well as tenure and independence, to illustrate the diversity of perspectives of our director nominees. More detailed information is provided in each director nominee’s biography beginning on page 8.9.
| Tenure/Age/Gender | Race/Ethnicity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Years on Board | Age | Gender | Hispanic/ Latinx | Asian | Black or African American | White | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. S. Burke | 3 | 58 | M | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. Colbert | 0 | 48 | M | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. K. Crews | 10 | 66 | M | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. E. Felsinger | 12 | 74 | M | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. F. Harrison | 4 | 64 | F | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 7 | 60 | M | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. J. Moore | 18 | 67 | M | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. J. Sanchez | 7 | 62 | M | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. A. Sandler | 5 | 62 | F | 🌑 | 🌑 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L. Z. Schlitz | 2 | 55 | F | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
K. R. Westbrook | 18 | 66 | M | 🌑 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Director Since | Age | Gender | Hispanic/Latinx | Asian | Black or African American | White | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. S. Burke | 2018 | 61 | M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. Colbert | 2021 | 50 | M |
|
|
|
|
|
| · |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. C. Collins, Jr. | 2022 | 61 | M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. K. Crews | 2011 | 68 | M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
E. de Brabander | 2023 | 61 | F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. F. Harrison | 2017 | 66 | F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 2014 | 62 | M | · |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. J. Moore | 2003 | 69 | M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| · | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. A. Sandler | 2016 | 64 | F | · |
|
|
| · |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L. Z. Schlitz | 2019 | 57 | F |
|
|
| · |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
K. R. Westbrook | 2003 | 68 | M |
|
|
|
|
|
| · |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||
64% Overall Diversity | 91% Independent | |||||||
45% Black, Asian, or Hispanic | 36% Female | |||||||
| ADM Proxy Statement |
General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting
Proxy StatementCommonly Asked Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting
GENERAL MATTERSWhy did I receive this proxy statement?
The Board of Directors asks that you complete the accompanyingvote by proxy forin advance of the annual stockholders’ meeting. This proxy statement describes the proposals on which you, as a stockholder of the Company, are being asked to vote. It gives you information on the proposals, as well as other information, so that you can make an informed decision. You are invited to attend the annual meeting to vote on the proposals, but you do not need to attend in order to vote. The meeting will be completely virtual and will be held at the time place, and locationweb address mentioned in the Notice of Annual Meeting included in these materials.
Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability?
We will beare using the “notice and access” method of providing proxy materials to stockholders via the internet. We will mail to our stockholders (other than those described below) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and the 20212023 Annual Report on Form 10-K and how to vote electronically via the internet. This notice will also contain instructions on how to request a paper copy of the proxy materials. Stockholders holding shares through the ADM 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Salaried Employees (the “401(k) and ESOP”) and those stockholders who previously have opted out of participation in notice and access procedures will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail or an electronic copy of the proxy materials by email. We are first providing our stockholders with notice and access to, or first mailing or emailing, this proxy statement and a proxy form around March 22, 2022.April 10, 2024.
Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
Our common stockholders of record at the close of business on April 4, 2024, are the only holders entitled to notice of the annual meeting and to vote at the meeting. At the close of business on April 4, 2024, we had 501,763,545 outstanding shares of common stock, each share being entitled to one vote on each of the director nominees and on each of the other matters to be voted on at the meeting.
How do I vote my shares and what can I do if I change my mind after I vote my shares?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote your shares electronically during the annual meeting via the internet by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2024, or you may vote by proxy prior to the annual meeting (1) via the internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card, (2) if you received printed proxy materials, by calling the toll free number found on the proxy card, or (3) if you received printed proxy materials, by filling out the proxy card and returning it in the envelope provided. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you must obtain a “legal proxy” from the organization that is the record holder of your shares in order to vote your shares electronically during the annual meeting. You may vote by proxy prior to the annual meeting by following the instructions you receive from the organization that is the record holder of your shares.
If you properly submit a proxy, your shares will be voted at the meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to voting by:
| (1) | delivering written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary; |
| (2) | delivering to our Corporate Secretary a new proxy form bearing a date later than your previous proxy; or |
| (3) | attending the annual meeting online and voting again (attendance at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy). |
Is my vote confidential?
We have a policy of keeping confidential all proxies, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders. Such documents are available for examination only by the inspectors of election, our transfer agent, and certain employees associated with processing proxy cards and tabulating the vote. We will not disclose any stockholder’s vote except in a contested proxy solicitation or as may be necessary to meet legal requirements.
What is the quorum required for the annual meeting?
The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the meeting will constitute a quorum to conduct business at the annual meeting.
| 6 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING — Commonly Asked Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting |
What are the voting requirements for the various proposals?
Under our bylaws, stockholders elect our directors by a majority vote in an uncontested election (one in which the number of nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected) and by a plurality vote in a contested election (one in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected). Because this year’s election is an uncontested election, each director nominee receiving a majority of votes cast (where the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee exceeds the number of shares voted “against” that nominee) will be elected. Approval of each other proposal presented in the proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock present, in person or by proxy, at the meeting and entitled to vote on that matter.
What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes on voting?
A vote to “abstain” on the election of directors will have no effect on the outcome of that proposal. A vote to “abstain” on each other proposal presented in this proxy statement will have the effect of a vote against those proposals.
If you hold shares in street name, your broker, bank, or other nominee is required to vote your shares according to your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee, it will still be able to vote your shares with respect to certain “discretionary” items, but will not be allowed to vote your shares with respect to “non-discretionary” items. Proposals 1, 2, and 4 are “non-discretionary” items. If you do not instruct your broker, bank, or other nominee how to vote with respect to those proposals, it may not vote for those proposals, and you shares will be counted as broker “non-votes.” Proposal 3 is considered to be a discretionary item, and your broker, bank, or other nominee will be able to vote on this proposal even if it does not receive instructions from you. Broker non-votes will not have any effect on the result of the vote on any of the proposals.
What are the Company’s costs associated with this proxy solicitation?
We pay the costs of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. We have retained Georgeson LLC to help us solicit proxies. We will pay Georgeson LLC a base shareholder meeting services fee of approximately $15,000 plus reasonable project management fees and expenses for its services. Our employees or employees of Georgeson LLC may also solicit proxies in person or by telephone, mail, or the internet at a cost which we expect will be nominal. We will reimburse brokerage firms and other securities custodians for their reasonable fees and expenses in forwarding proxy materials to their principals.
We have a policy of keeping confidential all proxies, ballots,Who can attend the Annual Meeting?
Our stockholders and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders. Such documents are available for examination only by the inspectors of election,advisors to our transfer agent, and certain employees associated with processing proxy cards and tabulating the vote. We will not disclose any stockholder’s vote except in a contested proxy solicitation or as may be necessary to meet legal requirements.
Our common stockholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2022,Company are the only people entitled to noticeattend the annual meeting.
Why is the Annual Meeting being held virtually?
The annual meeting this year will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, held at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2024. Hosting a virtual meeting provides expanded access, improved communication, and cost savings for our stockholders and us and enables participation from any location around the world.
How can stockholders submit questions to management during the Annual Meeting?
Stockholders may submit questions during the annual meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2024, and subject to the meeting rules of conduct, management will respond to questions following adjournment of the formal business of the annual meeting and to vote at the meeting. At the close of business on March 14, 2022, we had 562,477,478 outstanding shares of common stock, each share being entitled to one vote on each of the director nominees and on each of the other matters to be voted on at the meeting.
All stockholders will need a form of photo identification to attend the annual meeting.after any management remarks. If you are a stockholder of record that received a paper copy of the proxy materials and plan to attend, please detach the admission ticket from the top of your proxy card and bring it with you to the meeting. The number of people we will admit tohave questions during the meeting, will be determined by how the shares are registered, as indicated on the admission ticket. If you are either a stockholder whose shares are held by a broker, bank, or other nominee or a stockholder of record that did not receive a paper copy of the proxy materials, please request an admission ticket by writing to our office at ADM, Investor Relations, 4666 Faries Parkway, Decatur, Illinois 62526-5666. Your letter to our office must include evidence of your stock ownership. If you are not a stockholder of record, you can obtain evidence of ownership from your broker, bank, or nominee. The number of tickets that we send will be determined by the manner in which shares are registered. If your request is received by April 20, 2022, an admission ticket will be mailed to you. Entities such as corporations or limited liability companies that are stockholders may send one representative to the annual meeting, and the representative should have a pre-existing relationship with the entity represented. All other admission tickets can be obtained at the registration table locatedtype them in the lobby of 77 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, Illinois 60601, beginningdialog box at 7:30 A.M. on the day of the meeting. Stockholders who do not pre-register will be admitted toany point during the meeting only upon verification of stock ownership. Taking into account applicable governmental rules and guidance relateduntil the floor is closed to public health conditions, including the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, we may implement certain measures related to the annual meeting to protect the health and well-being of our employees, stockholders, other attendees, and the public at large. This may include requiring attendees to wear face masks or implementing social distancing or limiting the number of attendees.
The use of cameras, video or audio recorders, or other recording devices at the meeting is prohibited. The display of posters, signs, banners, or any other type of signage by any stockholder at the meeting is also prohibited. Firearms are also prohibited in 77 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, Illinois 60601.questions.
| ADM Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL NO. 1
General Information About the Annual Meeting and Voting
Proxy Statement
Any request to deviate from the admittance guidelines described above must be in writing, addressed to our office at ADM, Attention: Secretary, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601, and received by us by April 20, 2022. We will also have personnel in the lobby of 77 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, Illinois 60601 beginning at 7:30 A.M. on the day of the meeting to consider special requests.
If you properly execute the enclosed proxy form, your shares will be voted at the meeting. You may revoke your proxy form at any time prior to voting by:
|
|
|
Under our bylaws, stockholders elect our directors by a majority vote in an uncontested election (one in which the number of nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected) and by a plurality vote in a contested election (one in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected). Because this year’s election is an uncontested election, each director nominee receiving a majority of votes cast will be elected (the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of shares voted “against” that nominee). Approval of each other proposal presented in the proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present, in person or by proxy, at the meeting and entitled to vote on that matter. Shares not present at the meeting and shares voting “abstain” have no effect on the election of directors. For the other proposals to be voted on at the meeting, abstentions are treated as shares present or represented and voting, and therefore have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes (shares held by brokers who do not have discretionary authority to vote on the matter and have not received voting instructions from their clients) are counted toward a quorum, but are not counted for any purpose in determining whether a matter has been approved.
Principal Holders of Voting Securities
Based upon filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we believe that the following stockholders are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock shares:
| ||||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
(1) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2022, The Vanguard Group has sole dispositive power with respect to 57,025,447 shares, shared voting power with respect to 867,105 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,246,522 shares.
(2) Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022, Capital World Investors has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 40,417,605 shares.
(3) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2022, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 33,837,307 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 39,163,535 shares.
(4) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 2, 2022, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and related entities have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 33,884,596 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 147,036 shares.
(5) Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2022, State Street Corporation has shared voting power with respect to 28,186,272 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 30,871,560 shares.
Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
The Board of Directors currently consists of twelveeleven members. The Board, of Directors, acting on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated each of the current directors for re-election at the annual meeting, except for Mr. Dufour, who has determined not to stand for re-election. The Board of Directors has determined not to fill the vacancy that will occur as a result of Mr. Dufour’s departure and has, accordingly, resolved that, effective at the annual meeting, the number of directors of the Company will be reduced to eleven. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than eleven, which is the number of nominees. Unless you provide different directions, we intend for board-solicited proxies (like this one) to be voted for the nominees named below.meeting.
If elected, the nominees would hold office until the next annual stockholders’ meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified. If any nominee for director becomes unable to serve as a director, the persons named as proxies may vote for a substitute who will be designated by the Board of Directors. Alternatively, the Board of Directors could reduce the size of the board. The Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve as a director.
| • | Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than eleven, which is the number of nominees. |
Our bylaws require that each director be elected by a majority of votes cast with respect to that director in an uncontested election (where the number of nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected). In a contested election (where the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the plurality voting standard governs the election of directors. Under the plurality standard, the number of nominees equal to the number of directors to be elected who receive more votes than the other nominees are elected to the Board, regardless of whether they receive a majority of the votes cast. Whether an election is contested or not is determined as of the day before we first mail our meeting notice to stockholders.
| • | Unless you provide different directions, we intend for Board-solicited proxies (like this one) to be voted for the nominees named below. |
| • | If any nominee for director becomes unable to serve as a director, the persons named as proxies may vote for a substitute who will be designated by the Board. Alternatively, the Board could reduce the size of the board. |
| • | This year’s election was determined to be an uncontested election, and the majority vote standard will apply. For more details on the voting standard, see above under “Commonly Asked Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting.” |
| • | If elected, the nominees would hold office until the next annual stockholders’ meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified. |
If a nominee who is serving as a director is not elected at the annual meeting, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director annually submits an advance, contingent, irrevocable resignation that the Board may accept if the director fails to be elected through a majority vote in an uncontested election. In that situation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days after the date that the election results are certified. The Board will nominate for election or re-election as director, and will elect as directors to fill vacancies and new directorships, only candidates who agree to tender the form of resignation described above. If a nominee who was not already serving as a director fails to receive a majority of votes cast at the annual meeting, Delaware law provides that the nominee does not serve on the Board as a “holdover director.”
The information below describes, as applicable, the nominees, their ages, positions with our company,Company, principal occupations, current directorships of other publicly owned companies, directorships of other publicly owned companies held within the past five years, the year in which each first was elected as a director, and the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 14, 2022,April 4, 2024, directly or indirectly. Unless otherwise indicated, and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each nominee named in the table below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Unless otherwise indicated, all of the nominees have been executive officers of their respective companies or employed as otherwise specified below for at least the last five years.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the eleven nominees named below as directors. Proxies solicited by the Boardhas no reason to believe that any nominee will be so voted unless stockholders specifyunable to serve as a different choice.director.
 | The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the eleven nominees named below as directors. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice. | |||||||
| 8 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
Director Nominees
DIRECTOR NOMINEESDirector Nominees
Michael S. Burke
|
Age: 61 Director since: 2018 Board Committees: Audit (Chair); Executive; Nominating and Corporate Governance Common stock owned: 20,032 (1) Percent of class: * Qualifications, Skills, and Experience CEO Leadership Finance / Accounting International Business M&A Risk Management Sustainability / Environmental / Social Project Management | Mr. Burke brings deep expertise in driving the evolution of global businesses, strategic planning, international market dynamics, and overseeing risk management from his tenure as Chair and CEO of AECOM, a Fortune 500 company that designs, builds, finances and operates infrastructure assets in more than 150 countries. He also contributes his significant experience leading companies through transformation, developed through his roles at AECOM, where he played a key role in preparing the company for its IPO in 2007, and spearheaded international business development and M&A strategy. At AECOM, Mr. Burke also transformed one of the firm’s subsidiaries into a leading environmental engineering firm, developing significant sustainability expertise, which he has further developed through serving on the boards of CarbonCure and Nexii Building Solutions, companies focused on reducing harmful emissions in the construction process. He also brings expertise in finance, accounting, and tax matters drawing on his experience as a Chief Financial Officer and his 15-year career at KPMG advising public companies. | |||
 Public Boards • PRIOR (within past 5 years): AECOM (Chairman) Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: Universal Engineering Sciences (Chair); Westwood Professional Services (board member); SitelogIQ (board member); CarbonCure (board member); Nexii Building Solutions (board member); American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (member); California Bar Association (member) • PRIOR: Business Roundtable (board member; Chair, Infrastructure Committee); Children’s Bureau (Vice Chair); World Economic Forum (Co-Chair, Steering Committee, Infrastructure and Urban Development) |
- Chief Executive Officer (2014-2015) - President (2011-2014) - Other leadership roles (2005-2011), including Chief Financial Officer (2006-2011) • KPMG LLP - Member of - Partner (1995-2005) - Various roles (1990-1995) | |||
infrastructure firm) from March 2015 – August 2020; Chief Executive Officer of AECOM from March 2014 to March 2015; President of AECOM from 2011 to March 2014.
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 9 |
Directorships of Other Publicly-Owned Companies: Chairman of AECOM within the past five years.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: In August 2020, Mr. Burke retired as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of AECOM, an infrastructure firm that designs, builds, finances, and operates infrastructure assets in more than 150 countries. Mr. Burke first joined AECOM in October 2005 and, prior to serving as its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, held several leadership positions with the company, including Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy, Chief Corporate Officer, and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining AECOM, Mr. Burke was with the accounting firm KPMG LLP, serving in various leadership positions. Mr. Burke brings to the Board of Directors his deep expertise in accounting and finance, his experience as a CEO, and his involvement in projects throughout the world. Mr. Burke also brings significant ESG experience, including having built one of the largest environmental engineering firms in the world (a subsidiary of AECOM) focused on sustainability and currently serving as a member of the board of directors of CarbonCure and Nexii Building Solutions, companies focused on reducing the harmful emissions from the utilization of cement in the construction process.
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Theodore Colbert Age: 50 Director since: 2021 Board Committees: Audit; Compensation and Succession Common stock owned: 9,395 (2) Percent of class: * Qualifications, Skills, and Experience International Business M&A Risk Management Sales / Marketing Project Management Information Technology / Cybersecurity | Mr. Colbert brings extensive corporate leadership experience to the Board, along with his deep expertise in information technology, cybersecurity, data and analytics, and automation, which he acquired over his nearly three-decade career overseeing information technology, data security and architecture at several global market-leading companies. His most recent positions at Boeing further developed his sales and marketing capabilities, M&A experience, government regulation experience, and expertise in international business dynamics, including his role as President and CEO of its Global Services business that provided services to global customers across all OEMs and his current role as President and CEO of Boeing Defense, Space & Security, providing solutions across defense, government, space, intelligence, and security to customers worldwide. Leading global businesses focused on serving security and national defense companies distinguishes Mr. Colbert as an expert in world-class information security systems and risk management. This expertise has been honored with numerous prestigious awards throughout his career, including most recently the 2022 Black Engineer of the Year Award and the 2022 ORBIE Award for Leadership, being named the 2021 Capital CIO of the Year and one of the Most Influential Black Executives in Corporate America by Savoy magazine in 2020 and 2021, as well as being the first recipient of the Fisher Center prize for Excellence in Driving Transformation from the Fisher Center For Business Analytics at Berkeley. | |||
Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships
| ||||
 • CURRENT: The National Space Council Users Advisory Group (appointed by Vice President Kamala Harris); New Leaders (Chair); The Executive Leadership Council (member); Thurgood Marshall College Fund (Co-Vice Chair); DC College Access Program (board member); Virginia Tech Innovation Campus Advisory Board (board member); Aerospace Industries Association (Chair) • PRIOR: Georgia Tech President’s Advisory Board (two terms) |
| |
and Vegetable Business Chief Executive Officer of Monsanto Company (an agricultural company) from 2007 –2009.
Directorships of Other Publicly-Owned Companies: Director of WestRock Company and Hormel Foods Corporation.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Mr. Crews retired from Monsanto Company in 2009. He served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Vegetable Business CEO for Monsanto Company from 2007 to 2009, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2007. Mr. Crews brings to the Board of Directors extensive expertise in finance and related functions, as well as significant knowledge of corporate development, agri-business, and international operations.
|
 |
| |
and Chief Executive Officer of Boeing Global Services since October 2019; Chief Information Officer and Senior Vice President of Information Technology & Data Analytics of The Boeing Company from April 2016 – October 2019 and Chief Information Officer and Vice President of Information Technology Infrastructure of The Boeing Company from November 2013 – April 2016.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Prior to being named President and Chief Executive Officer of Boeing Global Services in October 2019, Mr. Colbert served a variety of roles at The Boeing Company since 2009, including Chief Information Officer and Senior Vice President of Information Technology & Data Analytics from April 2016 – October 2019 and Chief Information Officer and Vice President of Information Technology Infrastructure from November 2013 – April 2016. Mr. Colbert also served as Senior Vice President of Enterprise Architecture at Citigroup from 2007 – 2009. Mr. Colbert brings extensive expertise in corporate leadership to the Board of Directors, as well as significant knowledge of information technology, information security, cybersecurity, and data and analytics.
|
 |
| |
services company) from 2011 – December 2012.
Directorships of Other Publicly-Owned Companies: Lead Director of Northrop Grumman Corporation. Director of Gannett Co., Inc. within the past five years.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Mr. Felsinger brings extensive experience as a board member, chair, and CEO with Fortune 500 companies. Mr. Felsinger retired as Executive Chairman of Sempra Energy in December 2012. His leadership roles at Sempra Energy and other companies have allowed him to provide the Board of Directors with his expertise in mergers and acquisitions, environmental matters, corporate governance, strategic planning, engineering, finance, human resources, compliance, risk management, international business, and public affairs.
Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
Director Nominees
|
 |
| |
and consumer products company) from 2011 – 2019; President of Hill’s Pet Nutrition Inc. North America from 2009 – 2011; Vice President, Marketing for Colgate U.S. from 2006 – 2009.
Directorships of Other Publicly-Owned Companies: Director of WestRock Company.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Ms. Harrison retired in 2019 as the President of Global Oral Care at Colgate-Palmolive Company, a worldwide consumer products company focused on the production, distribution, and provision of household, health care, and personal products. She was previously President of Hill’s Pet Nutrition Inc. North America, a position she held from 2009 to 2011. Additionally, she served as Vice President, Marketing for Colgate U.S. from 2006 to 2009, and Vice President and General Manager of Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals, North America, and Europe from 2005 to 2006. Previously, Ms. Harrison held a number of leadership roles at Colgate commencing in 1983. Ms. Harrison’s qualifications to serve as a director of our company include her extensive leadership, management, operations, marketing, and international experience, along with her ESG experience in overseeing environmentally appropriate packaging and formulas for consumer products.
|
 |
- Chief Information Officer and Senior Vice President of Information Technology & Data Analytics (2016-2019) - Chief Information Officer and Vice President of Information Technology Infrastructure (2013-2016) - Other leadership roles (2009-2013) • Citigroup - Senior Vice President of Enterprise Architecture (2007-2009) • Ford Motor Company - Various roles in the Information Technology organization (1996-2007) | |
investment and advisory firm) since 2011; Chief Executive Officer of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation from 2010 –2011(6).
| 10 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Directorships of Other Publicly-Owned Companies: Chairman of Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Mr. Moore retired as Chief Executive Officer of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation in 2011, and held positions of increasing importance at Smurfit-Stone and related companies since 1987. Prior to 1987, Mr. Moore served 12 years at Continental Bank in various corporate lending, international banking, and administrative positions. Mr. Moore brings to the Board of Directors his substantial experience in leadership, banking and finance, strategy development, and operations management. Mr. Moore also brings extensive experience in environmental and sustainable practices from his time at Smurfit-Stone and his service on the board of the Sustainable Forestry Initiative, with particular focus on recycling, carbon sequestration, reduction of energy and water usage, and sustainable forestry.
James C. Collins, Jr. Age: 61 Director since: 2022 Board Committees: Compensation and Succession; Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Common stock owned: 4,459 (1) Percent of class: * Qualifications, Skills, and Experience CEO Leadership International Business Agriculture / Food / Retail Consumer M&A Sustainability / Environmental / Social Sales / Marketing Project Management Food Science / R&D | Mr. Collins contributes to the Board deep expertise in global agriculture and food science innovation developed over his extensive executive leadership experience in the food and agriculture industry. During his tenure leading agriculture business lines at DuPont and Dow DuPont, and most recently as the CEO of Corteva – the public spin-off of Dow DuPont’s crop protection and agrisciences divisions with a global scale – he oversaw the launch of numerous new products and drove strong growth in their R&D and innovation pipelines. His experience leading the integration of legacy DuPont and Dow agricultural businesses to drive preparation for Corteva’s spin also enhances the Board’s M&A and corporate governance expertise. He also brings extensive sales and marketing experience, beginning as a sales representative early in his career and later taking on leadership roles with responsibility for implementing multi-channel, multi-brand growth strategies. Through his work in agriculture supply chains, Mr. Collins has also developed a keen understanding of how to support and partner with global farmers to improve the sustainability of the agriculture and nutrition value chains. During his time at Corteva, he led a comprehensive array of initiatives to enhance sustainability, with a strong focus on helping farmers lead with new practices and innovations. He currently serves on the board of Vestaron Corporation, a private company dedicated to improving the safety, efficacy and sustainability of crop protection through migration from synthetic pesticides to peptide-based biopesticides. | |||
Public Boards • PRIOR (within past 5 years): Corteva, Inc.; Cibus, Inc. Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: Vestaron Corporation (board member); Pivot Bio (board member); University of Delaware College of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Advisory Committee member) • PRIOR: CropLife International (board member); University of Delaware’s Alfred Lerner College of Business & Economics (advisory board member); US China Business Council (member); Business Roundtable (Special Committee on Equity and Racial Justice; Climate Policy Committee; Trade Committee); National 4-H Council (board member) | Career Highlights • Corteva, Inc. (a global agricultural and seed company) - Chief Executive Officer (2019-2021) • DowDuPont - Chief Operating Officer (2017-2019) • DuPont - Executive Vice President (2014-2017) - Senior Vice President (2013-2014) - President Industrial Biosciences (2011-2013) - VP Acquisitions and Integration – Danisco (2011) - President Crop Protection (2003-2010) | |||
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 11 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Terrell K. Crews Lead Director Age: 68 Director since: 2011 Board Committees: Executive Common stock owned: 54,355 (3) Percent of class: * Qualifications, Skills, and Experience Finance / Accounting International Business Agriculture / Food / Retail Consumer M&A Risk Management Sustainability / Environmental / Social | Mr. Crews, who has served as our independent Lead Director since May 2023, contributes to the Board deep expertise in the international agricultural industry, business transformation, and agri-business operations gained over his 32-year career at Monsanto, a global agrochemical and agricultural biotechnology company. Serving in his role as Chief Financial Officer at Monsanto for nearly a decade, Mr. Crews oversaw corporate finance and reporting in addition to capital allocation strategies. His other roles with the company included helming the global vegetable business, assignments in Latin America, and leading financial operations for its Asia-Pacific business, which gave him significant expertise in risk management and strategic planning. Mr. Crews also has experience leading financing for M&A activity and other corporate transactions, including overseeing the financial integration of 11 acquired seed companies as head of finance for Monsanto’s Global Seed Group. His long tenure in agricultural industry executive leadership led him to develop a keen understanding of evolving views of broad stakeholder groups on sustainability and contributed to his experience developing capital allocation strategies aligned with corporate sustainability priorities. Recognized by the NACD Directorship 100™for his leadership, excellence, and integrity in corporate governance, Mr. Crews is well-qualified to serve in the role of Lead Director. Additionally, having served on the Board since 2011, his tenure enables him to have a deep understanding of the Company’s strategy, business, products, and goals, allowing him to more effectively provide independent strategic leadership to the Company. | |||
Public Boards • CURRENT: WestRock Company • PRIOR (within past 5 years): Hormel Foods Corporation Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: Freed-Hardeman University (board member); Teay’s River Investments (board member) | Career Highlights • Monsanto Company (a global agricultural and seed company) - Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Vegetable Business CEO (2007-2009) - Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2000-2007) - Various other roles (1977-2000) | |||
| 12 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Ellen de Brabander Age: 61 Director since: 2023 Board Committees: Audit; Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Common stock owned: 2,599 (1) Percent of class: * Qualifications, Skills, and Experience International Business Agriculture / Food / Retail Consumer M&A Risk Management Sustainability / Environmental / Social Project Management Food Science / R&D Information Technology / Cybersecurity | Dr. de Brabander brings to the Board a broad scientific background and a strong track record of innovation in several consumer industries including human nutrition, life sciences and animal health. In her current role as Executive Vice President of Innovation and Regulatory Affairs at Elanco, Dr. de Brabander utilizes her R&D expertise driving early and late-stage pipeline execution across pet health and farm animals, including nutritional health solutions. This deep research and innovation expertise was fostered in her previous role as senior vice president for R&D at PepsiCo, with company-wide responsibility for food safety, quality, regulatory and digital transformation. She also led R&D operations for global businesses, including Merial (now Boehringer Ingelheim), Intervet (now Merck Animal Health) and DSM, and brings extensive experience with information technology, having served as the Chief Technology Officer for Merial. In addition to her corporate success, she has been a founding board member of EIT (European Institute of Technology) and founding CEO of EIT Food, the largest public-private partnership in the food sector. Dr. de Brabander earned her Ph.D. cum laude in bio-organic chemistry from Leiden University in the Netherlands and completed her post-doctoral work in molecular biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the group of Prof. Dr. H.G. Khorana, a Nobel laureate. She is the co-author of over 60 publications in scientific journals, holds 18 patents, and has received multiple awards for her research. | |||
Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: PeakBridge (scientific advisory board member and investment committee member); Brabantse Ontwikkel Maatschappij (a regional development organization in The Netherlands) (board member); Sanquin Health Solutions (board member); Brightlands Venlo (food/ agro innovation campus and ecosystem in The Netherlands) (board president) • PRIOR: New York Academy of Sciences (board member); Open University, The Netherlands (board member) | Career Highlights • Elanco (a global leader in animal health) - Executive Vice President, Innovation and Regulatory Affairs (2021-present) • PepsiCo - Senior Vice President, R&D Technical Insights, Digital Solutions, and Compliance (2014-2021) • EIT Food (food innovation community supported by the EU) - Interim Chief Executive Officer (2016-2018) • Merial (now part of Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health) - Chief Technology Officer (2008-2014)
| |||
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 13 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Suzan F. Harrison Age: 66 Director since: 2017 Board Committees: Audit;Executive; Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility (Chair) Common stock owned: 20,273 (1) Percent of class: * Qualifications, Skills, and Experience International Business Agriculture / Food / Retail Consumer M&A Sustainability / Environmental / Social Sales / Marketing Food Science / R&D | In her four decades of executive leadership positions at Colgate-Palmolive, a global consumer products company focused on the production, distribution and provision of household, healthcare and personal care, Ms. Harrison has gained extensive experience in operational management and M&A. She acquired deep understanding of evolving consumer trends, sales and marketing and development of customer-driven innovation as Vice President of Marketing for Colgate U.S. She also built her research and development experience overseeing the new products development process for retail customers in oral care, pet nutrition and oral pharmaceuticals. Ms. Harrison has extensive sustainability experience acquired through her oversight of global brands and their evolution in alignment with stakeholder sustainability expectations. Ms. Harrison has been recognized by the NACD Directorship 100™for her leadership, excellence, and integrity in corporate governance. | |||
 Public Boards • CURRENT: WestRock Company; Ashland Inc. | Career Highlights • Colgate-Palmolive Company (a global household and consumer products company) - President of Global Oral Care (2011-2019) - President Hill’s Pet Nutrition Inc. North America (2009-2011) - Vice President, Marketing (2006-2009) - Vice President and General Manager of Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals, North America, and Europe (2005-2006) - Various other roles (1983-2005) | |||
| 14 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Juan R. Luciano Chair of the Board Age: Director since: 2014 Board Committees: Executive Common stock owned: Percent of class:*
Qualifications, Skills, and Experience CEO Leadership International Business Agriculture / Food / Retail Consumer M&A Risk Management Sustainability / Environmental / Social Sales / Marketing Project Management Food Science / R&D | Since joining ADM in 2011, Mr. Luciano has spent more than a decade in various senior executive leadership roles working to drive our Company’s evolution. During his time with ADM he has spearheaded our major growth drivers and sales and marketing efforts, including the commercial and production activities of ADM’s corn, oilseeds, and agricultural services businesses, development of sustainability strategy, and the increased use of research and technological innovation to meet customer needs. He most recently led a strategic growth campaign that has expanded ADM’s footprint in global markets, including through select M&A activity, building capabilities and adding talent and expertise that have allowed our Company to create value at every part of the global value chain. Under his leadership, ADM has undergone a remarkable transformation, building on more than a century of heritage to create a global nutrition business, with an industry-leading array of ingredients and solutions that are opening the door to growth opportunities in key global macro trend areas. He also has overseen the Company’s operational excellence initiatives and risk management functions. Prior to joining ADM, he had a successful 25-year tenure at The Dow Chemical Company, where he last served as executive vice president and president of the Performance division. | |||
Public Boards • CURRENT: Eli Lilly and Company (Lead Director). Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: Rush University Medical Center (Director); Intersect Illinois (board member); Economic Club of Chicago (member); Commercial Club of Chicago (member); The Business Roundtable (member) • PRIOR: Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University (board member); US-China Business Council (member) | Career Highlights • ADM - Chair of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (2016-present) | |||
since January 2016; Chief Executive Officer and President from January 2015 – January 2016; President and Chief Operating Officer from February 2014 – December 2014; Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 2011 – February 2014.
Directorships of Other Publicly-Owned Companies: Lead Director of Eli Lilly and Company.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Mr. Luciano joined ADM in 2011 as executive vice president and chief operating officer, was named president in February 2014, was named Chief Executive Officer in January 2015, and was named Chairman of the Board in January 2016. Mr. Luciano has overseen the commercial and production activities of ADM’s Corn, Oilseeds, and Agricultural Services businesses, as well as its research, project management, procurement, and risk management functions. He also has overseen the company’s operational excellence initiatives, which seek to improve productivity and efficiency companywide. He has led the company’s efforts to improve its capital, cost, and cash positions. Previously, Mr. Luciano was with The Dow Chemical Company, where he last served as executive vice president and president of the performance division.
- President and Chief Operating Officer (2014) - Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (2011-2014) • The Dow Chemical Company (a multinational chemical company) - Executive Vice President and President, Performance Division (2010-2011) - Various other roles (1985-2010)
|
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 15 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Patrick J. Moore Age: 69 Director since: 2003 Board Committees: Audit; Executive; Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) Common stock owned: 85,791 (1) Percent of class: * Qualifications, Skills, and Experience CEO Leadership Finance / Accounting International Business M&A Risk Management Sustainability / Environmental / Social Project Management | With over two decades of experience in the financial sector, including in his early career at Continental Bank, as CFO at Smurfit-Stone and in his current position as founder, President and CEO of a private equity investment and advisory firm, Mr. Moore contributes to the Board his financial expertise and substantial executive leadership experience in international banking and finance, strategy development, commodity management, and operations management. Throughout his carrier, Mr. Moore developed significant experience in risk management and M&A. Mr. Moore also brings extensive experience in environmental and sustainable practices from his time at Smurfit-Stone, a producer of containerboard and corrugated packaging and one of the world’s largest paper recyclers, and his service on the board of the Sustainable Forestry Initiative, with particular focus on recycling, carbon sequestration, reduction of energy and water usage, and sustainable forestry. Mr. Moore has been recognized by the NACD Directorship 100™for his leadership, excellence, and integrity in corporate governance. | |||
 Public Boards • CURRENT: Energizer Holdings, Inc. (Chairman) Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: St. Louis Zoological Association (board member); Hoverfly Holdings (board member); Engineered Corrosion Solutions (board member) • PRIOR: North American Review Board of American Air Liquide Holdings, Inc. |
| |||
private equity firm) since July 2020; Senior Managing Director of Pt. Capital and Chairman of CNS Global Advisors (an international trade and investment consulting firm) from November 2013 – July 2020; Under Secretary for International Trade, U.S. Department of Commerce from 2010 – November 2013.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Mr. Sanchez is a Partner at Holland & Knight LLP, where he serves as Co-Lead of the firm’s International Trade Practice. In addition, Mr. Sanchez is an Advisor at Pt. Capital, a private equity firm focused on responsible investments in the Pan Arctic. From November 2013 – July 2020, Mr. Sanchez served as CEO and chairman of the board of CNS Global Advisors, a firm focused on international trade and investment. In 2009, President Obama nominated Mr. Sanchez to be the Under Secretary for International Trade at the U.S. Department of Commerce. He was later unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Mr. Sanchez served in that role until November 2013. There he was responsible for strengthening the competitiveness of U.S. industry, promoting trade and investment, enforcing trade laws and agreements, and implementing the President’s National Export Initiative. Mr. Sanchez brings to the Board of Directors substantial experience in public policy, international trade, and international investment.
Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
Director Nominees
• PJM Advisors, LLC (a private equity investment and advisory firm founded by Mr. Moore)
- President and Chief Executive Officer (2011-present)
• Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (a leader in integrated containerboard and corrugated package products and paper recycling) (5)
- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2002-2011)
- Other roles including Chief Financial Officer, Vice President-Treasurer and General Manager, Industrial Packaging division (1987-2002)
• Continental Bank
- Various roles in corporate lending, international banking, and administration (1975-1987)
|
 | ||
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Debra A. Sandler Age: Director since: 2016 Board Committees: Audit; Nominating and Corporate Governance Common stock owned: Percent of class:*
|
firm) since October 2015; Chief Health and Wellbeing Officer of Mars, Inc. from July 2014 – July 2015; President, Chocolate, North America of Mars, Inc. from April 2012 – July 2014; Chief Consumer Officer of Mars Chocolate North America from 2009 – March 2012.
Directorships of Other Publicly-Owned Companies: Director of Gannett Co., Inc., Dollar General Corporation, and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Ms. Sandler is currently President of LaGrenade Group, LLC, a marketing consultancy she founded to advise consumer packaged goods companies operating in the Health and Wellness space. She was previously Chief Health and Wellbeing Officer of Mars, Inc., a position she held from July 2014 to July 2015. Additionally, she served as President, Chocolate, North America from April 2012 to July 2014, and Chief Consumer Officer, Mars Chocolate North America from November 2009 to March 2012. Prior to joining Mars, Ms. Sandler spent 10 years with Johnson & Johnson in a variety of leadership roles. Ms. Sandler has strong marketing and operating experience and a proven record of creating, building, enhancing, andleading well-known consumer brands as a result of the leadership positions she has held with Mars, Johnson & Johnson, and PepsiCo.
|
 Qualifications, Skills, and Experience Agriculture / Food / Retail Consumer Sustainability / Environmental / Social Sales / Marketing Food Science / R&D |
| |||
consulting and advisory firm) since 2007; Chairman and Chief Strategic Officer of Millennium Digital Media Systems, L.L.C. (a broadband services company) (MDM)(8) from 2006 – 2007.
Directorships of Other Publicly-Owned Companies: Director of T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Mosaic Company; Lead Independent Trust Manager of Camden Property Trust. Director of Stifel Financial Corp. within the past five years.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Mr. Westbrook brings legal, media, and marketing expertise to the Board of Directors. He is a former partner of a national law firm, was the President, Chief Executive Officer, and co-founder of two large cable television and broadband companies, and was or is a member of the board of several high-profile companies, including T-Mobile USA, Inc. and the National Cable Satellite Corporation, better known as C-SPAN. Mr. Westbrook also previously served on the board of a multi-billion-dollar not-for-profit healthcare services company.
| a consulting firm that advises a wide range of clients on marketing innovation and overall business development. She also enhances the Board’s expertise in financial and strategic planning, research and development in the food science industry acquired in her current role as founder and CEO of Mavis Foods. The Board also benefits from Ms. Sandler’s expertise in corporate social responsibility, as demonstrated through her public speaking engagements on topics such as diversity and inclusion, multicultural business development, and health and wellbeing in the consumer packaged goods industry. |
Public Boards
|
Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: Hofstra University (board member); The Executive Leadership Council (member); Pharmavite, LLC (board member); Trewstar Corporate Board Services (Partner) | Career Highlights • LaGrenade Group, LLC (a marketing consulting firm Ms. Sandler founded to advise consumer packaged goods companies operating in the Health and Wellness space) - President (2015-present) • Mavis Foods, LLC (a startup Ms. Sandler founded that makes and sells Caribbean sauces and marinades) - Chief Executive Officer (2018-present) • Mars, Inc. - Chief Health and Wellbeing Officer (2014-2015) - President, Chocolate, North America (2012-2014) - Chief Consumer Officer of Mars Chocolate North America (2009-2012) • Johnson & Johnson - Various roles, including Worldwide President, McNeil Nutritionals division (1999-2009) • PepsiCo - Various roles, including Marketing Vice President (1985-1999) | |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 17 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Lei Z. Schlitz Age: Director since: 2019 Board Committees: Compensation and Succession; Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Common stock owned: Percent of class:*
Qualifications, Skills, and Experience International Business M&A Sustainability / Environmental / Social Sales / Marketing Project Management Food Science / R&D | Dr. Schlitz is an accomplished leader, with experience in strategy development, M&A and growth initiatives, and operational excellence at an international scale, including several global manufacturing companies. She has extensive expertise in research and development, having served in product development roles at Johnson Controls, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) and Siemens Energy and Automation. She has also built research and development expertise specifically within the food science sector, including during her tenure as executive vice president of ITW’s $22B Food Equipment segment, which services commercial food service and food retail customers around the globe. She also oversaw product portfolio growth by building strong market-driven strategy at Siemens, developing important strategic planning, sales and marketing expertise. Dr. Schlitz contributes to the Board her strong sustainability expertise, including her first-hand experience driving product innovations in energy-efficient electrical distribution products and equipment at GE Global Research and GE Industrial Systems and overseeing diversity and inclusion initiatives at ITW as an executive member of the company’s Diversity & Inclusion Council. Dr. Schlitz holds a doctorate in mechanical engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and a bachelor’s degree in engineering mechanics from Tsinghua University, China. | |||
Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: Society of Women Engineers (member) | Career Highlights • Johnson Controls (a global building products company) - Vice President and President, Global Products (2022-present) • Illinois Tool Works Inc. (a global multi- industrial manufacturer) - Executive Vice President, Automotive OEM - Executive Vice President, Food Equipment (2015-2020) - Group President, Worldwide Ware-Wash, Refrigeration, and Weigh/Wrap Businesses (2011-2015) - Vice President, Research & Development, and Head of ITW Technology Center (2008-2011) • Siemens Energy & Automation - Business Manager for Emerging Businesses, Residential Product Division (2006-2008) - Director of Engineering (2001-2006) | |||
January 2020; Executive Vice President, Food Equipment at Illinois Tool Works from September 2015 – January 2020; Group President, Worldwide Ware-Wash, Refrigeration, and Weigh/Wrap Businesses at Illinois Tool Works from 2011 –December 2015; Vice President, Research & Development, and Head of ITW Technology Center at Illinois Tool Works from 2008 –2011.
Qualifications and Career Highlights: Dr. Schlitz is currently Executive Vice President of the Automotive OEM segment at Illinois Tool Works Inc., a publicly held, global multi-industrial manufacturer. She oversees a global business involving the design and manufacture of fasteners, interior and exterior components, and powertrain and braking systems for automotive OEMs and their top-tier suppliers around the world. Previously, she has served in leadership roles at Illinois Tool Works, serving as Executive Vice President of the Food Equipment segment, a global commercial food equipment business, serving institutional, industrial, restaurant, and retail customers around the world, and thegroup president of various food equipment businesses and leading research and development efforts. Dr. Schlitz brings extensive leadership experience in strategy development, growth initiatives, and operational excellence, along with strong sustainability experience, including driving innovations in energy and water efficiency and reduction of global warming potential in the manufacturing process.
Dr. Schlitz is also an executive member of Illinois Tool Works’ Diversity & Inclusion Council, which oversees the diversity and inclusion initiatives of Illinois Tool Works.
* Less than 1% of outstanding shares
(1) Consists of stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan that are deemed to be the equivalent of outstanding shares of common stock for valuation purposes.
(2) Includes 44,545 stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan.
(3) Includes 3,307 stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan.
(4) Includes 83,453 stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan and 60,000 shares held in trust.
(5) Includes 775,561 shares held in trust, 238 shares held by a family-owned limited liability company, and 1,490,451 shares that are unissued but are subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days.
(6) Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in January 2009 and emerged in 2010.
(7) Includes 21,549 stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan.
(8) Broadstripe, LLC (formerly MDM) and certain of its affiliates filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in January 2009, approximately fifteen months after Mr. Westbrook resigned from MDM.
| 18 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Kelvin R. Westbrook Age: 68 Director since: 2003 Board Committees: Compensation and Succession (Chair); Executive; Nominating and Corporate Governance Common stock owned: 37,283 (1) Percent of class: * Qualifications, Skills, and Experience Agriculture / Food / Retail Consumer M&A Risk Management Information Technology / Cybersecurity | Mr. Westbrook brings valuable insights on consumer trends and preferences, as well as extensive information technology and cybersecurity, acquired through decades serving as President, Chief Executive Officer, and co-founder of two large cable television and broadband companies. As a former partner in the corporate law and mergers and acquisitions practice of a national law firm, he also brings significant legal expertise in M&A and risk management. His risk management and corporate governance expertise developed in this executive role is further enhanced by his service on the boards of directors and board committees of numerous public companies and not-for-profit entities, including experience in regulated industries. Mr. Westbrook has been recognized by the NACD Directorship 100™for his leadership, excellence, and integrity in corporate governance. | |||
Public Boards • CURRENT T-Mobile US, Inc.; Mosaic Company; Camden Property Trust (Lead Independent Trust Manager) Non-Public & Non-Profit Boards; Memberships • CURRENT: Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater St. Louis (board member); BioSTL (board member); University of Washington Foster School of Business (Advisory Board Chair) • PRIOR: BJC Healthcare (board member); St. Louis Internship Program (board member) | Career Highlights • KRW Advisors, LLC (a consulting and advisory firm founded by Mr. Westbrook) - President and Chief Executive Officer (2007-present) • Millennium Digital Media Systems, L.L.C. (a broadband services company) - Chairman and Chief Strategic Officer (2006-2007) - President and Chief Executive Officer (1997-2006) • LEB Communications, Inc. (an affiliate of Charter Communications) - President and Chairman (1993-1996) • Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP - Partner (1990-1993) | |||
| * | Less than 1% of outstanding shares |
| (1) | Consists of stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan that are deemed to be the equivalent of outstanding shares of common stock for valuation purposes. |
| (2) | Includes 9,385 stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan. |
| (3) | Includes 53,595 stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan. |
| (4) | Includes 1,310,288 shares held in trust, 238 shares held by a family-owned limited liability company, and 905,920 shares that are unissued but are subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days. |
| (5) | Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in January 2009 and emerged in 2010. |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 19 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term |
Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors for a One-Year Term
Director Experiences, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills; Board Diversity
DIRECTOR EXPERIENCES, QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, AND SKILLS; BOARD DIVERSITY
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director who is a sitting chief executive officer of a company may serve on the boards of no more than two other public companies in addition to our Board, while all other directors may serve on the boards of no more than four public company boards in total. In assessing an individual’s qualifications to become a member ofnominating directors for election at our annual stockholder meeting, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider various factors including education, experience, judgment, independence, integrity, availability, and other factorshave determined that the Committee deems appropriate. The Nominating andeach of our directors is currently compliant with our Corporate Governance Committee strivesGuidelines and has sufficient time, energy, and attention to recommend candidates that complement the current board members and other proposed nominees so as to further the objective of having a board that reflects a diversity of background and experience with the necessary skills to effectively perform the functions of the Board and its committees. In addition, the Committee considers personal characteristics of nominees and current board members, including race, gender, and geographic origin, in an effort to obtain a diversity of perspectivesserve on theour Board.
The specific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that qualify each of our directors to serve on the Board are described in the biographies above and in the Proxy Summary under “Director Nominee Qualifications, Skills, and Experience” on page 34 and “Director Nominee Diversity, Age, Tenure, and Independence” on page 4.5.
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FROM STOCKHOLDERS
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider nomineescandidates for director who are recommended by a stockholder. All candidates, regardless of the source of their recommendation, are evaluated using the same criteria.
If a stockholder provided thatdesires to nominate an individual to stand for election as a director at an annual stockholders’ meeting, the stockholder submitsmust submit the nominee’s name in a written notice delivered to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not less than 6090 nor more than 90120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual stockholders’ meeting. However, if the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary date, the notice must be receiveddelivered to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailedgiven or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made (whichever first occurs). Different notice delivery requirements may apply if the number of directors to be elected at an annual meeting is being increased, and we do not make a public announcement naming all of the nominees or specifying the size of the increased board at least 100 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting.
Any notice of a stockholder nomination must set forth the information required by Section 1.4(c) of our bylaws, must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, and must be accompanied by a written consent from the proposed nominee to being named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected, a written representation and agreement from the proposed nominee attesting to certain facts set forth in Section 1.4(c)(2) of our bylaws, and a written statement from the proposed nominee as to whether he or shesuch person intends, if elected, to tender the advance, contingent, irrevocable resignation that would become effective should the individual fail to receive the required vote for re-election at the next meeting of stockholders.stockholders and upon acceptance of such resignation by the Board. Stockholders may also have the opportunity to include nominees in our proxy statement by complying with the requirements set forth in Section 1.15 of our bylaws. All candidates, regardless of the source of their recommendation, are evaluated using the same criteria.
| 20 | ADM Proxy Statement |
Board Leadership and OversightCorporate Governance
BOARD CHAIR
Our company’sCompany’s Board of Directors does not have a current requirement that the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Chair be either combined or separated, because the Board believes it is in the best interest of our companyCompany to make this determination based on the position and direction of the companyCompany and the constitution of the Board and management team. The Board regularly evaluates whether the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Chair should be combined or separated. The Board’s implementation of a careful and seamless succession plan over the past years demonstrates that the Board takes seriously its responsibilities under the Corporate Governance Guidelines to determine who should serve as ChairmanBoard Chair at any point in time in light of the specific circumstances facing our company.Company. After careful consideration, the Board has determined that having Mr. Luciano, our company’sCompany’s Chief Executive Officer, continue to serve as ChairmanBoard Chair is in the best interest of our stockholders at this time. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the day-to-day management of our companyCompany and the development and implementation of our company’sCompany’s strategy, and has access to the people, information, and resources necessary to facilitate board function. Therefore, the Board believes at this time that combining the roles of Chief Executive Officer and ChairmanBoard Chair contributes to an efficient and effective board.
TheLEAD DIRECTOR AND INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT
Each year, if the Board Chair is not independent, the independent directors elect a Lead Director at the Board’s first meeting following the annual meeting.Director. Mr. Felsinger is currently servingCrews has served as Lead Director.Director since May 2023 and provides strong independent leadership and oversight. The Board believes that having an independent Lead Director provides the Board with independent leadership and facilitates the independence of the Board from management. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly evaluates the responsibilities of the Lead Director and considers current trends regarding independent board leadership.
In prior years, the Board has enhanced the Lead Director’s responsibilities, as set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, in connection with determining performance criteria for evaluating the Chief Executive Officer,Officer; evaluating the Board, committees, and individual directors,directors; and planning for management succession. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Lead Director:
(1) presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, and regularly meets with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for discussion of appropriate matters arising from these sessions;
(2) coordinates the activities of the other independent directors and serves as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors;
(3) consults with the Chairman and approves all meeting agendas, schedules, and information provided to the Board, and may, from time to time, invite corporate officers, other employees, and advisors to attend Board or committee meetings whenever deemed appropriate;
(4) interviews, along with the Chairman and the Chair and members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, all director candidates and makes recommendations to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;
(5) advises the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on the selection of members of the board committees;
(6) advises the board committees on the selection of committee chairs;
(7) works with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to propose a schedule of major discussion items for the Board;
(8) guides the Board’s governance processes;
(9) provides leadership to the Board if circumstances arise in which the role of the Chairman or Chief Executive Officer may be, or may be perceived to be, in conflict;
(10) has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;
(11) if requested by major stockholders, ensures that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication;
(12) leads the non-management directors in determining performance criteria for evaluating the Chief Executive Officer and coordinates the annual performance review of the Chief Executive Officer;
(13) works with the Chair of the Compensation and Succession Committee to guide the Board’s discussion of management succession plans;
(1) presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Board Chair is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, and regularly meets with the Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer for discussion of appropriate matters arising from these sessions; | (6) advises the board committees on the selection of committee chairs; | |||
(2) coordinates the activities of the other independent directors and serves as liaison between the Board Chair and the independent directors; | (7) works with the Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer to propose a schedule of major discussion items for the Board; | |||
(3) consults with the Board Chair and approves all meeting agendas, schedules, and information provided to the Board, and may, from time to time, invite corporate officers, other employees, and advisors to attend Board or committee meetings whenever deemed appropriate; | (8) guides the Board’s governance processes; | |||
(4) interviews, along with the Board Chair and the Chair and members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, all director candidates and makes recommendations to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; | (9) provides leadership to the Board if circumstances arise in which the role of the Board Chair or Chief Executive Officer may be, or may be perceived to be, in conflict; | |||
(5) advises the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on the selection of members of the board committees; | (10) has the authority to call, and set the agendas for, meetings of the independent directors; | |||
| ADM Proxy Statement |
Board Leadership and Oversight
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Board Role in Risk Oversight |
(11) if requested by major stockholders, ensures that the Lead Director is available for consultation and direct communication; | (14) works with the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to facilitate the evaluation of the performance of the Board, committees, and individual directors; | |||||
(12) leads the non-management directors in determining performance criteria for evaluating the Chief Executive Officer and coordinates the annual performance review of the Chief Executive Officer; | (15) works with the Chair of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee to set sustainability and corporate responsibility objectives; and | |||||
(13) works with the Chair of the Compensation and Succession Committee to guide the Board’s discussion of management succession plans; | (16) performs such other duties and responsibilities as the Board may determine. | |||||
(14) works with the Chair and members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to facilitate the evaluation of the performance of the Board, committees, and individual directors;
(15) works with the Chair and members of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee to set sustainability and corporate responsibility objectives; and
(16) performs such other duties and responsibilities as the Board may determine.
In addition to electing a Lead Director, our independent directors facilitate the Board’s independence by meeting frequently as a group, including meeting in executive session at each regular board meeting, and fostering a climate of transparent communication. The high level of contact and communication between our Lead Director and our Chairman between board meetingsBoard Chair throughout the year and the specificity contained in the Board’s delegation of authority parametersLead Director’s responsibilities also serve to foster effective board leadership.Board leadership, as demonstrated by the internal investigation led by the Audit Committee regarding certain accounting practices and procedures with respect to ADM’s Nutrition reporting segment, including as related to certain intersegment sales, which was initially disclosed in January 2024. For more details on our independent directors, see below under “Independence of Directors” on page 27.
Management is responsible for day-to-day risk assessment and mitigation activities, and our company’sCompany’s Board of Directors is responsible for risk oversight, focusing on our company’sCompany’s overall risk management strategy, our company’sCompany’s degree of tolerance for risk, and the steps management is taking to manage and mitigate our company’sCompany’s risks. While the Board as a whole maintains the ultimate oversight responsibility for risk management, the committees of the Board can be assigned responsibility for risk management oversight of specific areas. The Audit Committee currently maintains responsibility for overseeing our company’sCompany’s enterprise risk management (ERM) process and regularly discusses our company’sCompany’s major risk exposures, the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, and guidelines and policies to govern our company’sCompany’s risk assessment and risk management processes. The Audit Committee periodically reports to the Board of Directors regarding significant matters identified with respect to the foregoing.
Management has established an Enterprise Risk Management Committee consisting of a Chief Risk Officer and other personnel that represent multiple functional and regional areas within our company,Company, with broad oversight of the risk management process.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| q | q | q | q | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audit Committee
• assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to the stockholders relating to the
• oversees the
• regularly discusses the steps management has taken to monitor and control risk exposure
• regularly reports to the Board regarding significant matters identified | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
• assigns oversight of specific areas of risk to other committees
• recommends director nominees who it believes are capable to assess and monitor risk | Compensation and Succession Committee
• oversees process for assessing potential risks arising from compensation policies and practices • engages an independent outside consultant every other year to review the | Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee
• oversees the
• assesses the
• reviews sustainability-related risks quarterly through the | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Board Role in Risk Oversight
SENIOR MANAGEMENT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| q | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Enterprise Risk Management Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• ensures ongoing evaluation and implementation of processes to identify, evaluate, and prioritize risks to our
• ensures congruence of risk decisions with our
• supports the integration of risk assessment and controls into mainstream business processes, planning, and decision-making | • identifies roles and responsibilities across our
• promotes consistency and standardization in risk identification, reporting, and controls across our
• ensures sufficient information capabilities and information flow to support risk identification and controls and alignment of technology assets | • regularly evaluates the overall design and operation of the risk assessment and control process, including development of relevant metrics and indicators
• reports regularly to senior management and the Board regarding the above-described processes and the most significant risks to our |
CYBERSECURITY
Cyberattacks are an increasing risk for businesses, and ADM is actively takings steps and putting in place measures to defend itself. We have put in place security measures to prevent, detect, and mitigate cyber-based attacks, and have instituted control procedures for cybersecurity incident responses and disaster recovery plans for our critical systems. We have formed a ransomware task force and periodically run drills to enhance preparedness. In addition, we monitor this risk on an ongoing basis to detect and correct any breaches, and report metrics on the quality of our data security efforts and control environment to the highest level of management and to the Board of Directors. The Board actively overseeshas oversight of cybersecurity risk, which it manages as part of the company’s efforts to prevent, detect, and mitigate cyberattacks, both throughERM program. The Board is assisted by the Audit Committee, which has primary responsibility for this area in our Board,regularly reviews the cybersecurity program with management and throughreports to the full Board. Cybersecurity reviews by the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors through periodic cyber briefings. Thegenerally occur quarterly, or more frequently as determined to be necessary or advisable. In recent years, the Board has recently added a director, Mr. Colbert, who hashad served as Chief Information Officer for a large public company with sensitive information to assist ADMthe Board and Audit Committee in overseeing cybersecurity.cybersecurity risks.
Board Leadership and Oversight
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Our commitment to change and growth goes beyond our products and services. At ADM, sustainable practices and a focus on environmental and social responsibility are not separate from our primary business: they arefoundational to the Company’s purpose and culture, and integral to the work we dothe Company does every day to serve customers and create value for stockholders. We are committed to being a force for change in developing innovative, sustainable solutions in agriculture, food and nutrition, energy, and packaging materials while pursuing ways to continually improve our efforts in both protecting the environment and enhancing environmental and social sustainability. That is why our current strategic plan is called Sustainable Growth.
ADM has been recognized by several external parties for its efforts in sustainability:SUSTAINABILITY
| ||
|
SUSTAINABILITY
Our disclosure for sustainability topics, including climate change followand nature, are guided by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework:, and Taskforce on Nature-Related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) frameworks including Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics & KPIs.
Governance:Our sustainability efforts are overseen by our Board of Directors, in particularincluding a dedicated Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee, and led by our Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO), who is supported by regional sustainability teams.
The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee actively oversees our objectives, goals, strategies, and activities relating to sustainability and corporate responsibility matters and assists the Board in ensuring that we operate as a sustainable organization and responsible corporate citizen in order to enhance shareholder value and protect ADM’s reputation. For more on the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee, see below on page 28.
As for management, the Executive Council of ADM, our highest strategic and operational body, provides close supervision of our ESG efforts and an in-depth review of sustainability issues. Because we consider sustainability critical to our strategic planning and mergers and acquisitions efforts, the CSO reports to the Chief Strategy Officer and is an important part of the strategy team. Furthermore, regional sustainability teams, along with the corporate sustainability team, support the CSO to drive sustainability efforts in our facilities and supply chains around the world. Our sustainability efforts are also supported by the Centers of Excellence (CoE) that drive efficiency programs in their areas of focus such as the Utilities CoE, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion CoE, and Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) CoE.
ADM has set forth several key social and environmental commitments and policies that collectively outline our expectations for our colleagues, business partners and contractors, and our organization as a whole, with respect to our sourcing operations. In 2021, we updated two of these policies to more clearly define our objectives and expectations: Human Rights Policy and Policy to Protect Forests, Biodiversity and Communities. We also issued a Managing Supplier Non-Compliance procedure which lays out our approach to address non-compliances with these policies.
Strategy: In accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), we conduct and maintain a materiality assessment to identify topics that have a direct or indirect impact on the organization’s ability to create, preserve, or erode economic, environmental, and social value for itself, its stakeholders and society at large. In 2021, we engaged a reputable professional services firm to undertake an updated formal materiality assessment to guide our sustainability strategy in the coming years.
The assessment team applied its knowledge of the GRI methodology and our industry to select stakeholders for engagement based on the selection criteria of responsibility, influence, proximity, dependency, and representation. Working with ADM, the firm interviewed, surveyed, and researched publicly available information for a variety of internal and external stakeholders, including leadership, investors, employees, customers, and civil society.30.
| ADM Proxy Statement |
|
Board Leadership and Oversight
The assessment results indicate several key topics that are consistent across all stakeholder groups as critical importance: “GHG Emissions,” “Deforestation & Conversion,” “Governance,” and “Water Management.” Although these are critical to manage, other topics on the matrix are also important to ADM and our stakeholders.
Strategy: We have aligned our sustainability efforts with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, which serve as a road map to achieve a better future for all. Specifically, we are focusing our efforts toward Zero Hunger, Clean Water and Sanitation, Climate Action, and Life On Land.
Nature-based solutions (NbS) are defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)Land, as “actions to protect, sustainably manage and restore natural or modified ecosystems that address societal challenges effectively and adaptively, simultaneously providing human well-being and biodiversity benefits.” We expect this definition will underpin the forthcoming Taskforce for Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) guidance. As a company with deep agricultural roots, we are strongly positioned to leverage nature-based solutionsdescribed in our operations and our supply chain. Many of the key societal challenges identified by the IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions align with the UN SDG priorities.more detail below.
Board Leadership and Oversight
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
UN SDG | IUCN Societal Challenges | ADM Programs | ||||
Zero Hunger | Food Security | • Regenerative and sustainable agriculture projects that increase food production while promoting farm economic stability, minimizing chemical inputs, protecting water quality, and improving soil health and biodiversity
• Assessing and addressing post-harvest loss
• Food security and hunger relief | ||||
Clean Water and Sanitation | Water Security | •
• Clean water projects through ADM Cares | ||||
Climate Action | Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation |
• Permanent carbon capture and storage (CCS) via onsite injection and geological sequestration | ||||
Life on Land | Environmental Degradation and Biodiversity Loss | • No-Deforestation and |
•
•
| |||
Risk Management:Sustainability risk management, including climate change and deforestation, is integrated into the multi-disciplinary companywide enterprise risk management (ERM) process.
Each quarter, the ERM Sustainability subgroup reviews the risk matrix. Previously identified risks are discussed to ensure proper focusidentified through several processes, including TCFD Scenario Analysis, and time is spent discussingtracked and monitored in our ERM program.
In 2023, we launched our supply chain due diligence program and conducted a human rights saliency exercise. ADM has begun identifying and assessing emerging risks. The risk matrix includes quantitative review of impact, mitigation,nature-related issues using the LEAP framework from TNFD.
KPIs, Goals and residual risk as well as qualitative information about risk categories, warning periods, mitigation strategies, and effectiveness.
In 2021, ADM began the process of conducting a Scenario Analysis following the Taskforce for Climate Related Financial Disclosure’s (TCFD) guidelines. The analysis looked at the potential impact of three warming scenarios – 1.5° C (latest recommendation from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to prevent the worst effects of global warming), 2° C (aligned with the Paris Climate Accords), and 2.6° C (status quo). Various risks were included in the analysis including current and emerging regulation, technology, legal, market, reputation, and acute physical and chronic physical risks.
Key risks and opportunities for the Company include:
Transition Risks
Emerging regulation and carbon pricing mechanisms could result in increased operational costs in the short to medium term.
Changes in policy or introduction of new policies could introduce additional tax requirements at our facilities. For example, in South America, introduction of the national legislation on biomass based power generation units, which requires additional certification and taxes, could limit our ability to operate our assets and increase our operating costs.
Market demand has a direct effect on production, as well as demand for certified sustainable commodities. Changes in consumer demands could result in additional cost of implementation that may not be overcome by product sales.
ADM uses coal-fired cogeneration technology to meet a portion of its energy demand. We are working to reduce the carbon footprint of our operations, but transitions can be time intensive and costly.
Physical Risks
Increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events such as cyclones and floods could lead to increased direct costs from the disruption of supply chains and impair our ability to deliver products to customers in a timely manner.
Board Leadership and Oversight
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events such as cyclones and floods could lead to increased sourcing costs due to limited availability of agricultural commodities and impact ADM’s ability to produce goods, which would directly affect sales and revenue.
Increased calls for preserving and enhancing biodiversity by taking acres out of production—at a time when the world’s supply of raw materials is in great demand—may challenge ADM’s sourcing of raw materials. As the global population grows, and producers in many areas of the world must plant more to feed more people, a balance must be appropriately struck, or raw material shortages may result.
Opportunities
Developing enhanced transportation and warehousing scheduling, routing and tracking technologies can reduce carbon footprint and costs while improving customer delivery satisfaction.
Development and expansion of low-emission goods and services could lead to increased revenues resulting from increased demand. As various renewable fuel standards are implemented around the world, ADM has an opportunity to capitalize through the production and sale of ethanol, biodiesel, and renewable green diesel.
As more businesses and consumers look to renewable products, development of new products or services from R&D and innovation could lead to increased revenues through access to new and emerging markets.
GOALS, TARGETS, AND KPIs
Disclosure:Tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) and setting goals and targets enables us to measure and demonstrate progress toward our sustainability strategy.
In 2020,2023, we engaged a leading engineering professional services firm to conduct an in-depth carbon reduction feasibility study and help us shape our next set of goals to combat climate change. Ouradded three new environmental goals, collectively called “Strive 35” are an ambitious plan to, by 2035, reduce absolute GHG emissions by 25 percent, reduce energy intensity by 15 percent, reduce water intensity by 10 percent, and achieve a 90 percent landfill diversion rate. We also committed to develop a global strategy focused on improving community well-being in priority watersheds, including water-stressed areas, by 2025.
In 2021, we announced a goal to reduce our Scope 3 GHG emissions, which are emissions in our supply chain related to our products and operations but not in our control. We have assessed and calculated our Scope 3 footprint from 5 categories: purchased goods and services (raw material procurement), upstream transportation (delivery of raw materials and ocean shipping), downstream processing of sold goods, fuel and energy related emissions, and emissions from waste. Aligned with our Strive35 goals, we aim to achieve a 25% reduction by 2035 over 2019 baseline.
We aim to eliminate native habitat conversion by 2025 in high risk areas of South America. |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
| • | We aim to have 25% of our total energy usage derived from low-carbon sources by 2035. |
To ensure we are charting a path to achieve
| • | We aim to reduce our absolute water usage by 10% by 2035 over a 2019 baseline. |
Our Corporate Sustainability Report contains specific data and disclosures and is available on our Strive35 goals, we set 5-year targets to measure our progress against these longer-term goals.website at www.adm.com/sustainability.
ADM is fully committed to ending deforestation, preserving biodiversity, and conserving resources in our operations and supply chain. In March 2021, we released our new Policy to Protect Forests, Biodiversity and Communities and a 2030 target date to eliminate deforestation in our supply chains. Additionally, we announced we will achieve full traceability for our direct and indirect soybean supply chains in South America by the end of 2022.
We disclose key performance indicators aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Framework. Below are key metrics from calendar years 2019 and 2020.
| GRI 305-1, 305-2, 305-5 | Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
GHG Emissions, million metric tons* | 2019 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
Global Scope 1 GHG Emissions | 14.8 | 13.5 | ||||||||||||
Global Scope 2 GHG Emissions | 3.01 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
Global Scope 3 GHG Emissions** | 38.1 | 37.8 | ||||||||||||
Carbon Permanently Sequestered Onsite | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Absolute GHG Reduction over 2019 baseline | N/A | 8.9% | ||||||||||||
| GRI 303-1 | Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
Water Withdrawal (locations >100,000 m3/year) in million m3* | 2019 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
Groundwater | 43.1 | 41.1 | ||||||||||||
Municipal | 41.1 | 38.2 | ||||||||||||
Surface | 31.0 | 32.1 | ||||||||||||
| GRI 302-1 | Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
Energy consumption within the organization in million MWh* | 2019 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
Total non-renewable fuel consumption | 59.9 | 49.4 | ||||||||||||
Total renewable fuel consumption | 4.7 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||
| GRI 306-4 | Year Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
Waste diverted from disposal (%)** | 2019 | 2020 | ||||||||||||
Waste beneficially reused, recycled or otherwise diverted from landfill | 81.2 | 83.4 | ||||||||||||
* Data provided in these tables have been assessed by a third-party which has issued limited assurance statements.
** Data not included in third-party assessment.
SOCIAL IMPACT
ADM’s corporate social investment program, ADM Cares, aligns the Company’s corporate giving with its business strategies and sustainability objectives. Through the program, ADM works to sustain and strengthen its commitment to communities where ADM colleagues work live, and operatelive by directing funding to initiatives and organizations driving meaningful social, economic, and environmental progress. The ADM Cares team evaluates potential projects submitted for funding to ensure they meet eligibility criteria, such as initiatives that support education, food security, and hunger relief, or safe, responsible, and environmentally sound agricultural practices in critical growing regions around the world. Our three sustainability focus areas of giving are: sustainability, food security, and health and well-being.
| 24 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Board Role in Overseeing Political Activities |
Board Leadership and Oversight
Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility
Advancing Sustainable Agriculture – In 2021, ADM Cares helped more than 44,000 farmers by supporting sustainable agriculture projects.
Increasing Food Security – We donated the equivalent of 432 million meals globally in 2021.
Investing in Education – Last year, we supported nearly 7 million students by advancing STEM and agriculture education programs.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION
Part of ADM’s vision is to advance a diverse workplace with equitable opportunities for all its employees within an inclusive culture to make sure all colleagues globally feel they belong and make meaningful contributions to the success of each other and ADM. ADM brings together colleagues with many different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences. At ADM, we believebelieves diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) are key business priorities that will enable usADM to continue innovating, driving growth through customer focus, and delivering outstanding performance for shareholders.stockholders. Part of ADM’s vision is to foster an inclusive culture with equitable opportunities for all employees so that all members of its diverse, global workforce belong and make meaningful contributions to the success of each other and the Company.
OurThe Company’s comprehensive DE&I strategy includes four focus areas: Leadership Engagement & Communication,is focused on Recruitment, Advancement, &Development, Retention, and Networks & Sponsorships. In order to ensure that the Company’s global DE&I strategy aligns with its business strategy, ADM reinstalledCulture, and is supported by a global DE&I council, chaired by our CEO, Juan Luciano. The responsibility of this council is to establishwhich reflects the Company’s global business strategy and global priorities as well as measure and monitor progress. Each of ouracross four regions (North America, APAC, EMEA and LATAM) haveof the world. ADM’s DE&I Councils accountable for executing strategies specific to each region.
Our strategy is working. We receivedoverseen by the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee of the Board. The Senior Vice President, Chief People and Diversity Officer meets periodically with the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee to discuss ADM’s diversity progress and strategy.
In support of ADM’s commitment to a perfect 100 score onproductive, diverse, and inclusive workforce, it is a signatory to the Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s 2022 Corporate Equality Index.
ADM is committed to strengthening our gender diversity. In 2018, ADM affirmedCEO Action for Diversity & InclusionTM and a commitment throughmember of Paradigm for Parity® to achieve gender parity within. At the company’s senior leadership structure by 2030. Since making this commitment in 2018, we have improved our gender diversity from 21% to 26%. ADM is proud of its achievements to date and will continue to strengthen diversity moving forward. Starting in 2022, our commitment to making additional progress towards gender parity is included in our 2022 PSU Award as part of a two-goal ESG metric. See Changes to 2022 Compensation Programs Section of the CD&A. In 2021, ADM also launched the first of its Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) focused on women as part of the Company’s DE&I vision and strategy. ADM also held the Global Women’s Leadership Summit—a two-day virtual event aimed at inspiring and motivating the Company’s female leaders. ADM plans to publicly disclose its EEO-1 data for 2021 when the information is available.
At an industry level, ADM has been a key partnerfounded and currently participates in the establishment of Together We Grow, a consortium of agricultural industry leaders united in a shared belief that American agriculture’s best days are yet to come. Emphasizing diversity equity and inclusion, Together We Grow works to build a modern workforce with the skills, experience, and capabilities needed to keep pace with the growing world.
For additional details, please see ADM’s annual reportour Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
SAFETY
At ADM, we are committed to providing a safe working environment for all our employees and contractors. For the last several years, we havethe Company has been on a journeyworking to a goal of zero injuries – building asignificantly reduce its incident rate by strengthening its safety culture and systems so everyone will go home safely to their families and the things that are most important to them.
ADM finished 2021 with nosets high standards for the safety of our employees, contractors, and workplaces, including maintaining a goal of zero fatalities. In 2023, we did not meet our expectations for safety. The Company had two ADM colleague fatalities and a 50% reduction12 serious injuries in serious injuries. In 2021, about 80%2023. About 76% of ADM’s sites completed the year without recordable injuries and about 90% without lost workday injuries.
We’ve The Company is taking a series of actions to improve not only the occupational safety of our colleagues, but also recently set a new, ambitious goal: by 2025, we aimto improve the full process systems that support our daily operations efforts. Through the guidance of the Environmental, Health, and Safety Technology Center, the operations teams focused on the following programs to reduce our Total Recordable Incident Rate and Lost Workday Incident Rate by 50% over a 2020 baseline. We have launched or enhanced efforts to improve occupational safety, including:
“Take Control” program, which identified over 65,000 machine access and guarding opportunities globally;
Near-miss Reporting and Investigation; and
New Colleague Integration program.
Through these actions, we aim to achieve continuous improvement in 2022, which will help us on our path to achieve our five-year target.the most serious injuries:
Safe Work Permit and Last Minute Risk Assessment Standards; |
| • | Gloves Clock-to-Clock Program; |
| • | New Site Integration Process; and |
| • | Loss Prevention Principles |
Through continued application of these programs, ADM aims to continue to reduce its recordable injury rate in 2024 versus 2023. For additional details, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
Board Leadership and Oversight
Board Role in Overseeing Political Activities
Board Role in Overseeing Political Activities
The Board of Directors believes that participation in the political process is important to our business and our communities. WeADM and our political action committee (ADMPAC), funded by our employees’ voluntary contributions, (ADMPAC) therefore support candidates for political officein a bipartisan manner. These candidates and organizations that shareelected officials represent assets and/or areas with a large colleague presence and have a role in advancing our pro-growth vision,policy priorities related to our aspirations for the futurebusiness. Contributions are not an endorsement of global agriculture, and our commitment to the people who dependevery position taken by an official on it for their lives and livelihoods.every issue. Decisions by ADMPAC to support particular candidates and/or organizations are subject to fixed policiesmade consistent with the ADM PAC By-Laws and determinedguided by the company’s best interests, not the personal political preferences of our company’s executives.policies. ADMPAC submits to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) regular, detailed reports on all federal political contributions, which reportscontributions. Reports are publicly available to the public on the FEC’s website. Similarly, contributions to state candidates are disclosed to relevant state authorities and typically disclosed on individual states’ websites.
In addition to our contributions to individual candidates for public office and candidate committees, we also supporthave supported a small number of so-called “527” groups, including the Democratic Governors Association, Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, Democratic Lieutenant Governors Association, the Republican Governors Association, Ag America, and the Republican State Leadership Committee. We havedo not supportedsupport independent political expenditures or 501(c)(4) organizations. Finally, we have memberships in several industry, trade, and business associations representing the agriculture and the business community. If a trade association engages in politicalfederal lobbying activity, the amount of dues associated with this political advocacy isare reported in our quarterly LD2 filings.
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 25 |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Code of Conduct |
We engage in a centralized, deliberative process when making decisions about the company’sCompany’s political participation to ensure that it complies with all applicable laws and makes appropriate disclosures.
Contributions of greater than $1,000 typically require the approval of the board of directors of ADMPAC. The ADMPAC board of directors is chaired by the vice president of state government relations and composed of employees who represent various areasbusiness and functional segments of the company.Company. Contributions of less than $1,000 may be authorized by the company’sCompany’s vice president of government relations and vice president of state government relations. All contributions receive legal review by external counsel.
The Board of Directors provides oversight of ADMPAC’s and the company’sCompany’s political activities, political contributions, and compliance with relevant laws. At each quarterly board meeting, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, on behalf of the Board, of Directors, reviews and provides guidance on our political contributions in the previous quarter. Any member of the Board may obtain further detailed information concerning political contributions, trade associations, compliance with federal and state laws, or any other related topic.topic from the Company’s Government Relations team.
On January 11, 2021, ADM condemned the unlawful riots at the U.S. Capitol and announced that in light of the events of January 6, 2021, ADMPAC’s board would conduct a thorough review of all of its political donation policies to ensure that these policies fully reflect ADM’s values as a company. We temporarily suspended making new political donations until that review was complete. As a result of that review, the PAC board made changes to the ADMPAC bylaws to state that contribution decisions will be based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the character and integrity of a candidate, and the candidate’s commitment to our Constitution, republic, and democratic system. When ADM resumed contributions, it applied these new standards.
For more information on ADM’s political policies and activities, please see https://www.adm.com/our-company/us-political-contributions.
The Board has adoptedADM recently completed a comprehensive review and update of its Code of Conduct, thatwhich has been adopted by the Board and sets forth standards regarding matters such as honest and ethical conduct, compliance with law, and full, fair, accurate, and timely disclosure in reports and documents that we file with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in other public communications. The Code of Conduct applies to all of our directors, employees, and officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The Code of Conduct is available at our website,
https://www.adm.com/our-company/the-adm-way/code-of-conduct,and is available free of charge upon written request to ADM, Attention: Secretary, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601. Any amendments to certain provisions of the Code of Conduct or waivers of such provisions granted to certain executive officers will be disclosed promptly on our website.
Insider Trading Policy
We have adopted an insider trading policy that governs the purchase, sale, and other dispositions and transactions in our securities by our directors, officers, and employees, which is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations.
| 26 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Board, Committee, and Director Evaluations |
Board, Committee, and Director Evaluations
The Board of Directors believes that a robust annual evaluation process is a critical part of its governance practices. Accordingly, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees an annual evaluation of the performance of the Board, of Directors, each committee of the Board, and each individual director. This year, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engaged an independent outside lawyer who had served as a director and general counsel of public companies to conduct an in-depth interview of each director on the performance of the Board, committees, and individual directors. The outside lawyer provided reports on each committee to the chair of the committee, and reports on individual directors to the Chairman of the Board Chair, the Lead Director, and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Lead Director then delivered to and discussed with each individual director the evaluation of such director. Results of the performance evaluations of the committees and the Board were discussed at appropriate committee meetings and with the full Board.
The Board utilizes the results of these evaluations in making decisions on board agendas, board structure, committee responsibilities and agendas, and continued service of individual directors on the board.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires our directors and executive officers to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4, and 5 with the SEC. Based on our review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 that we have received from, or have filed on behalf of, our directors and executive officers, and on written representations from those persons that they were not required to file a Form 5, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, our directors and executive officers complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements, other than with respect to late Form 4 reports related to a grant of restricted stock units to each of Messrs. Christopher Cuddy, D. Cameron Findlay, Juan Luciano, Vince Macciocchi, Greg Morris, John Stott, Joseph Taets and Ray Young and Ms. Jennifer Weber, which reports should have been filed by February 16, 2021 but due to an administrative oversight were filed on February 19, 2021. Additionally, Mr. Taets filed a Form 5 on February 7, 2022 relating to a sale of ADM common stock which, due to an inadvertent error by the company, should have been, but was not, reported on a Form 4 by November 20, 2021.Board.
Interviews with independent outside lawyer |  | Results delivered to Board Chair, Lead Director, and Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee | | Individual evaluations are discussed with each director | | Committee and Board evaluations are discussed at committee meetings and with the full Board | ||||||
Independence of Directors
The Board of Directors has reviewed business, familial, and charitable relationships between our companyCompany and each non-employee director and director nominee to determine compliance with theapplicable NYSE independence standards and our bylaw independence standards, each described below, and to evaluate whether there are any other facts or circumstances that might impair a director’s or nominee’s independence. Based on that review, the Board has determined that eleventen of its twelveeleven current members, Messrs. Burke, Colbert, Collins, Crews, Dufour, Felsinger, Moore, Sanchez, and Westbrook, Mses. Harrison and Sandler, and Dr.Drs. de Brabander and Schlitz are independent. Mr. Luciano is not independent under the NYSE or bylaw standards because of his employment with us.
In determining that each director and nominee is independent (other than Mr. Luciano), the Board reviewed the following transactions, relationships, or arrangements.arrangements where the director is an officer of the third party. The Board of Directors determined that anythe amounts or relationships involved in alleach of the following matters fall below applicable thresholds or outside the NYSE or bylaw independence standards, that noneneither of the directors or nominee had a direct or indirect material interest in the matters described below, and that such matters do not impair the independence of any director or nominee.
Name | Matters Considered | ||
E. de Brabander | |||
Ordinary course business with
| |||
| |||
L. Z. Schlitz | Ordinary course business with | ||
| |||
| |||
IndependenceIn addition, the Board noted that the following directors are, or were during 2023, a member of Directors
Independencethe board of Directorsthe following organizations that ADM had purchases from, or sales to, during 2023: Mr. Collins, Cibus, Inc. and Pivot Bio; Mr. Crews, WestRock Company; Ms. Harrison, WestRock Company and Ashland Global Holdings; Ms. Sandler, Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. and Pharmavite; and Mr. Westbrook, Mosaic Company and T-Mobile US, Inc. Because in each case such transactions were on an arm’s length basis, the director served only as a board member of such organization, and none of the directors had a direct or indirect material interest in the matters described above, the Board determined that such matters do not impair the independence of any director.
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 27 |
The listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, require companies listed on the NYSE to have a majority of “independent” directors. Subject to certain exceptions and transition provisions, the NYSE standards generally provide that a director will qualify as “independent” if the Board affirmatively determines that he or she has no material relationship with our company other than as a director, and will not be considered independent if:
|
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Corporate Governance Guidelines |
|
|
|
|
Section 2.8 of our bylaws also provides that a majority of the Board of Directors be comprised of independent directors. Under our bylaws, an “independent director” means a director who:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independence of Directors
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that govern the structure and functioning of the Board and set forth the Board’s policies on governance issues. The guidelines, along with the written charters of each of the committees of the Board and our bylaws, are posted on our website, https://www.adm.com/investors/corporate-governance, and are available free of charge upon written request to ADM, Attention: Secretary, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601.
Independent Executive Sessions
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the non-management directors meet in executive session at least quarterly. If the non-management directors include any directors who are not independent pursuant to the Board’s determination of independence, at least one executive session each year includes only independent directors. The Lead Director, or in his or her absence, the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, presides at such meetings of independent directors. The non-management directors met in independent executive session four times during fiscal year 2021.2023.
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
Board Meetings and Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
During the last fiscal year, the Board of Directors held eightseven meetings. All incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the combined total meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served during such period. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that all directors standing for election are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All director nominees standing for election at our last annual stockholders’ meeting held on May 6, 2021, virtually4, 2023, attended that meeting.
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
The Board’s standing committees for the year ended December 31, 2021,2023, consisted of the Audit, Compensation and Succession, Nominating and Corporate Governance, Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility, and Executive Committees. Each committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, available on our website, www.adm.com.
The Audit Committee consists of Mr. Crews (Chair), Mr. Colbert, Mr. Dufour, Mr. Moore, Mr. Sanchez, and Ms. Sandler. The Audit Committee met nine times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Audit Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws, in the NYSE listing standards, and in Section 10A of the Exchange Act. No director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if such director serves on the audit committees of more than two other public companies unless the Board determines that such service would not impair such director’s ability to serve effectively on the Audit Committee.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee reviews:
The Audit Committee consists of Mr. Burke (Chair), Mr. Colbert, Dr. de Brabander, Ms. Harrison, Mr. Moore, and Ms. Sandler. The Audit Committee met nine times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Audit Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws, in the NYSE listing standards, and in Section 10A of the Exchange Act. No director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if such director serves on the audit committees of more than two other public companies unless the Board determines that such service would not impair such director’s ability to serve effectively on the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews: | ||
1.the overall plan of the annual independent audit;
2.financial statements;
3.the scope of audit procedures;
4.the performance of our independent auditors and internal auditors;
5.the auditors’ evaluation of internal controls;
6.the | 7.matters of legal and regulatory compliance;
8.the performance of our
9.business and charitable relationships and transactions between us and each non-employee director, director nominee, and executive officer to assess potential conflicts of interest and impairment of independence; and
10.the | |
For additional information with respect to the Audit Committee, see the sections of this proxy statement entitled “Board Role in Risk Oversight,” “Report of the Audit Committee,” and “Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies.” | ||
For additional information with respect to the Audit Committee, see the sections of this proxy statement entitled “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies.”
| 28 | ADM Proxy Statement |
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Information Concerning Committees and Meetings |
COMPENSATION AND SUCCESSION COMMITTEE | ||
The Compensation and Succession Committee | ||
The Compensation and Succession Committee consists of Mr. Westbrook (Chair), Mr. Burke, Ms. Harrison, and Ms. Schlitz. The Compensation and Succession Committee met four times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Compensation and Succession Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards, including the NYSE listing standards specifically applicable to compensation committee members.
The Compensation and Succession Committee: consists of Mr. Westbrook (Chair), Mr. Colbert, Mr. Collins, and Dr. Schlitz. The Compensation and Succession Committee met four times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Compensation and Succession Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards, including the NYSE listing standards specifically applicable to compensation committee members.
The Compensation and Succession Committee: | ||
1.establishes and administers a compensation policy for senior management;
2.reviews and approves the compensation policy for all of our employees and our subsidiaries other than senior management;
3.approves all compensation elements with respect to our directors, executive officers, and all employees with a base salary of $500,000 or more;
4.reviews and monitors our financial performance as it affects our compensation policies or the administration of those policies;
5.establishes and reviews a compensation policy for non-employee directors; | 6.reviews and monitors our succession plans;
7.approves awards to employees pursuant to our incentive compensation plans;
8.approves major modifications in the employee benefit plans with respect to the benefits that salaried employees receive under such plans;
9.ensures succession processes are in place to aid business 10. oversees and administers policies, plans, and agreements concerning the recoupment of incentive compensation, or “clawback policies.” | |
The Compensation and Succession Committee provides reports to the Board and, where appropriate, submits actions to the Board for ratification. Members of management attend meetings of the committee and make recommendations to the committee regarding compensation for officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. In determining the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the committee considers the evaluation prepared by the non-management directors. To the extent consistent with the General Corporation Law of Delaware, the committee may delegate the authority to grant equity awards to individuals who are not directors or executive officers. The charter for the Compensation and Succession Committee also provides that the committee may form subcommittees and delegate tasks to them. For additional information on the responsibilities and activities of the Compensation and Succession Committee, including the committee’s processes for determining executive compensation, see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” | ||
The Compensation and Succession Committee provides reports to the Board of Directors and, where appropriate, submits actions to the Board of Directors for ratification. Members of management attend meetings of the committee and make recommendations to the committee regarding compensation for officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. In determining the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the committee considers the evaluation prepared by the non-management directors.
In accordance with the General Corporation Law of Delaware, the committee may delegate to one or more officers the authority to grant stock options to other officers and employees who are not directors or executive officers, provided that the resolution authorizing this delegation specifies the total number of options that the officer or officers can award. The charter for the Compensation and Succession Committee also provides that the committee may form subcommittees and delegate tasks to them.
For additional information on the responsibilities and activities of the Compensation and Succession Committee, including the committee’s processes for determining executive compensation, see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE | ||||
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
Information Concerning Committees and Meetings
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Mr. Moore (Chair), Mr. Burke, Ms. Sandler, and Mr. Westbrook. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: consists of Mr. Moore (Chair), Mr. Burke, Ms. Sandler, and Mr. Westbrook. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: | ||
1.identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board, including evaluating individuals appropriately suggested by stockholders in accordance with our bylaws;
2.recommends individuals to the Board for nomination as members of the Board and board committees;
3.develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the | 4.assigns oversight of particular risk areas to other committees of the board;
5.leads the evaluation of the directors, the Board, and board committees; and
6.has oversight responsibility for certain of the |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 29 |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Stockholder Outreach and Engagement |
SUSTAINABILITY AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE | ||
The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee | ||
The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee consists of Ms. Harrison (Chair), Mr. Colbert, Mr. Crews, Mr. Dufour, Mr. Sanchez, and Ms. Schlitz. The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee met four times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards. For more information on the company’s sustainability and corporate responsibility efforts, see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility.”
The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee: consists of Ms. Harrison (Chair), Mr. Collins, Dr. de Brabander, and Dr. Schlitz. The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee met four times during the most recent fiscal year. All of the members of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee were determined by the Board to be independent directors, as that term is defined in our bylaws and in the NYSE listing standards.
The Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee: | ||
1. oversees objectives, goals, strategies, and activities relating to sustainability and corporate responsibility matters, including workplace safety, process safety, environmental, social
2. receives and reviews reports from management regarding strategies, activities, compliance, and regulations regarding sustainability and corporate responsibility; | 3. has authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external advisors; and
4. leads the evaluation of the | |
For more information on the Company’s sustainability and corporate responsibility efforts, see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility.” | ||
The Executive Committee consists of Mr. Luciano (Chairman), Mr. Felsinger (Lead Director), Mr. Crews (Chair of the Audit Committee), Ms. Harrison (Chair of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee), Mr. Moore (Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee), and Mr. Westbrook (Chair of the Compensation and Succession Committee). The Executive Committee did not meet during the most recent fiscal year. The Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board to determine matters which, in the judgment of the Chairman of the Board, do not warrant convening a special board meeting but should not be postponed until the next scheduled board meeting. The Executive Committee exercises all the power and authority of the Board in the management and direction of our business and affairs except for matters which are expressly delegated to another board committee and matters that cannot be delegated by the Board under applicable law, our certificate of incorporation, or our bylaws.
Stockholder Outreach and Engagement
Stockholder Outreach and Engagement
As part of our commitment to effective corporate governance practices, in 2021-22late 2023 and early 2024 we reached out to many of our largest institutional stockholders to hold formal discussions with them to help us better understand thetheir views of our investors on key topics. We intend to continue our outreach efforts following the filing of this proxy statement. Our Lead Director (who, as provided in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, ensures that he is available for consultation and direct communication with major stockholders), Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel, Chief Human ResourcesPeople Officer, Chief Sustainability Officer, and other management participated in these meetings to discuss and obtain feedback on our Board of Directors, corporate governance, enterprise risk management,ERM, executive compensation, ESG,environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, and other related issues important to our stockholders.
We share stockholder feedback with the Board and its committees to enhance our governance, compensation, and ESG practices. We also review the voting results of our most recent annual meeting of stockholders, the governance practices of similar public companies, and current trends in governance as we consider enhancements to our governance practices and disclosure. We value our dialogue with our stockholders and believe our outreach efforts, which are in addition to our other communication channels available to our stockholders and interested parties, provide transparency of our corporate governance, risk management, compensation, ESG, and other related practices and help ensure that theseour practices continue to evolve and reflect the insights and perspectives of our many stakeholders. We welcome suggestions from our stockholders on how the Board and management can enhance this dialogue in the future.
We have approved procedures for stockholders and other interested parties to send communications to individual directors or the non-employee directors as a group. You should send any such communications in writing addressed to the applicable director or directors in care of the Secretary, ADM, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All correspondence will be forwarded to the intended recipients.
| 30 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Director Compensation |
Our standard compensation for non-employee directors consists of an annual retainer of $325,000 and additional annual stipends for service as Lead Director or as a committee chair. Effective($40,000), Chair of the Audit Committee (effective as of the second quarter of fiscal year 2021, the annual retainer2023, this increased from $300,000$30,000 to $315,000, the annual stipend for our Lead Director increased to $40,000 from $30,000, the annual stipend for the Chair of the Audit Committee remained at $25,000, the annual stipend for the$35,000), Chair of the Compensation and Succession Committee remained at $20,000, the annual stipend for the($25,000), Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee increased to $20,000 from $15,000,($20,000), and the annual stipend for the Chair of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee remained at $10,000. ($20,000).
Directors may elect to receive up to $125,000 of their annual retainer in cash or stock units, and the remaining portion of the annual retainer and any stipends are paid in stock units. Each stock unit is deemed for valuation and bookkeeping purposes to be the equivalent of a share of our common stock. We do not pay fees for attendance at board and committee meetings. Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket traveling expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings. Directors may also be provided with certain perquisites from time to time.
Stock units are credited to the account of each non-employee director on a quarterly basis in an amount determined by dividing the quarterly amount of the retainer or stipend to be paid in stock units by the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the last business day of that quarter, and are fully-vested at all times. As of any date on which cash dividends are paid on our common stock, each director’s stock unit account is also credited with stock units in an amount determined by dividing the dollar value of the dividends that would have been paid on the stock units in that director’s account had those units been actual shares by the fair market value of a share of our stock on the dividend payment date. For purposes of this plan, the “fair market value” of a share of our common stock on any date is the average of the high and low reported sales prices for our stock on the NYSE on that date. Each stock unit is paid out in cash on the first business day following the earlier of (i) five years after the end of the calendar year that includes the quarter for which that stock unit was credited to the director’s account, and (ii) when the director ceases to be a member of the Board. The amount to be paid will equal the number of stock units credited to a director’s account multiplied by the fair market value of a share of our stock on the payout date. A director may elect to defer the receipt of these payments in accordance with the plan.
We do not pay fees for attendance at board and committee meetings. Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket traveling expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings. Directors may also be provided with certain perquisites from time to time.
The following table summarizes compensation provided to each non-employee director for services provided during fiscal year 2021.2023.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | Stock Unit Awards ($)(2) | All Other ($)(3) | Total ($) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Unit Awards ($)(2) | Stock Unit Awards ($)(2) | All Other Compensation | All Other Compensation | Total ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||
M. S. BURKE | 125,000 | 186,250 | 18,485 | 329,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. S. BURKE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. S. BURKE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. S. BURKE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. S. BURKE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. COLBERT | — | 205,962 | 1,076 | 207,038 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. COLBERT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. COLBERT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. COLBERT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. COLBERT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. C. COLLINS, JR. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. C. COLLINS, JR. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. C. COLLINS, JR. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. C. COLLINS, JR. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. C. COLLINS, JR. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. K. CREWS | 125,000 | 211,250 | 61,523 | 397,773 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. K. CREWS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. K. CREWS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. K. CREWS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. K. CREWS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. DUFOUR | 125,000 | 186,250 | 36,488 | 347,738 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E. DE BRABANDER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E. DE BRABANDER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E. DE BRABANDER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E. DE BRABANDER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E. DE BRABANDER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. E. FELSINGER | — | 348,750 | 115,954 | 464,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. E. FELSINGER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. E. FELSINGER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. E. FELSINGER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. E. FELSINGER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. E. FELSINGER(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. F. HARRISON | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. F. HARRISON | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. F. HARRISON | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. F. HARRISON | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. F. HARRISON | 125,000 | 196,250 | 24,745 | 345,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. J. MOORE | 125,000 | 205,000 | 111,798 | 441,798 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. J. MOORE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. J. MOORE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. J. MOORE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. J. MOORE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. J. SANCHEZ | 125,000 | 186,250 | 35,102 | 346,352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. J. SANCHEZ(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. J. SANCHEZ(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. J. SANCHEZ(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. J. SANCHEZ(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F. J. SANCHEZ(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. A. SANDLER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. A. SANDLER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. A. SANDLER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. A. SANDLER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. A. SANDLER | 125,000 | 186,250 | 30,444 | 341,694 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
L. Z. SCHLITZ | 125,000 | 186,250 | 12,789 | 324,039 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
L. Z. SCHLITZ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L. Z. SCHLITZ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L. Z. SCHLITZ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
L. Z. SCHLITZ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
K. R. WESTBROOK | 125,000 | 206,250 | 73,822 | 405,072 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
K. R. WESTBROOK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
K. R. WESTBROOK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
K. R. WESTBROOK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
K. R. WESTBROOK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | As described above, up to $125,000 of the annual retainer may be paid in cash or in stock units, or a combination of both, at the director’s election. The remainder of the retainer and any stipends are paid in stock units. All compensation paid in stock units is reported in the “Stock Awards” column. |
| ADM Proxy Statement |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE — Director Compensation |
Director Compensation
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
(1) As described above, up to $125,000 of the annual retainer may be paid in cash or in stock units, or a combination of both, at the director’s election. The remainder of the retainer and any stipends are paid in stock units. All compensation paid in stock units is reported in the “Stock Awards” column. For fiscal year 2021, Messrs. Colbert and Felsinger elected to receive their entire annual retainer in the form of stock units.
(2) The amounts set forth in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock units paid to each of the listed directors computed in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. Each of the listed directors is a non-employee director and the fair value of services provided by each director has been used to calculate the number of stock units credited to each director by dividing the quarterly fair value of the services provided by the fair market value of a share of our company’s common stock on the last business day of the quarter. For purposes of this plan, the “fair market value” of a share of our common stock on any date is the average of the high and low reported sales prices for our stock on the NYSE on that date. The aggregate number of stock units credited to the account of each non-employee director as of December 31, 2021 (including mandatory stock unit grants, voluntary elections to receive stock units, and the deemed reinvestment of dividends) was as follows:
| (2) | The amounts set forth in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock units paid to each of the listed directors computed in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. Each of the listed directors is a non-employee director and the fair value of services provided by each director has been used to calculate the number of stock units credited to each director by dividing the quarterly fair value of the services provided by the fair market value of a share of our Company’s common stock on the last business day of the quarter. For purposes of this plan, the “fair market value” of a share of our common stock on any date is the average of the high and low reported sales prices for our stock on the NYSE on that date. The aggregate number of stock units credited to the account of each non-employee director (or in the cases of Mr. Felsinger and Mr. Sanchez, former directors) as of December 31, 2023 (including mandatory stock unit grants, voluntary elections to receive stock units, and the deemed reinvestment of dividends) was as follows: |
Name | Number of Stock Units at 12/31/ | |||
M. S. Burke | 19,804 | |||
T. Colbert | 7,818 | |||
J. C. Collins, Jr. | 2,938 | |||
T. K. Crews | 51,322 | |||
| 1,095 | |||
D. E. Felsinger | 67,752 | |||
S. F. Harrison | 22,851 | |||
P. J. Moore | 83,367 | |||
F. J. Sanchez | — | |||
D. A. Sandler | 25,515 | |||
L. Z. Schlitz | 15,496 | |||
K. R. Westbrook | 45,127 | |||
(3) The amounts in this column consist of: (i) for all directors, the dividend equivalent amounts paid in stock units in 2021 on stock awards; and (ii) for Mr. Moore, $5,000 in charitable gifts pursuant to the company’s matching charitable gift program which is available to substantially all employees and non-employee directors.
| (3) | The amounts in this column consist of: (i) for all directors, the dividend equivalent amounts paid in stock units in 2023 on stock awards; and (ii) for Messrs. Felsinger and Moore, $5,000 in charitable gifts pursuant to the Company’s matching charitable gift program which is available to substantially all employees and non-employee directors. |
| (4) | Dr. de Brabander joined the Board upon her election at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders on May 4, 2023. Mr. Felsinger and Mr. Sanchez were directors of the Company until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. |
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our companyCompany has guidelines regarding ownership of shares of our common stock by our non-employee directors. These guidelines call for non-employee directors to own shares of common stock (including stock units issued pursuant to the Stock Unit Plan for Non-Employee Directors) over time with a fair market value of not less than five times the amount of the maximum cash portion of the annual retainer. Application of these guidelines will consider the time each director has served on the Board of Directors, as well as stock price fluctuations that may impact the achievement of the five times cash retainer ownership guidelines.
We prohibit directors from hedging or pledging companyCompany securities.
| 32 | ADM Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL NO. 2
Proposal No. 2—Advisory Vote on Executive Stock OwnershipCompensation
Executive Officer Stock Ownership
ThePursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the following table showsproposal provides our stockholders with an opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the number of sharescompensation of our common stock beneficially ownednamed executive officers, as of March 14, 2022, directly or indirectly, by each ofdisclosed in this proxy statement. In considering your vote, you may wish to review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” discussion herein, which provides details as to our compensation policies, procedures, and decisions regarding the named executive officers.
Executive | Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1) | Options Exercisable Within 60 Days | Percent of Class | |||
J. R. LUCIANO | 2,921,820 (2) | 1,490,451 | * | |||
R. G. YOUNG | 1,273,808 (3) | 746,375 | * | |||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | 234,832 | 0 | * | |||
G. A. MORRIS | 369,942 (4) | 117,839 | * | |||
J. D. TAETS | 336,496 (5) | 35,126 | * | |||
* Less than 1%officers, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables, notes, and narrative disclosures in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific element of outstanding shares
(1) Includesour executive compensation program, but rather the overall compensation program for eachour named executive officer stock options exercisable within 60 daysofficers.
The Compensation and Succession Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, and the following:Board of Directors believe that the executive compensation policies, procedures, and decisions made with respect to our named executive officers are competitive, are based on our pay-for-performance philosophy, and are focused on achieving our Company’s goals and enhancing stockholder value.
Unvested RSUs | RSUs that vest within 60 days | |||
J. R. Luciano | 412,842 | 0 | ||
R. G. Young | 133,001 | 0 | ||
V. F. Macciocchi | 92,551 | 0 | ||
G. A. Morris | 92,551 | 0 | ||
J. D. Taets | 85,410 | 0 | ||
(2) Includes 775,561 shares held in trust, 238 shares held by a family-owned limited liability company.
(3) Includes 4,530 shares held in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
(4) Includes 649 shares heldAccordingly, for the reasons discussed above and in the 401(k)“Compensation Discussion and ESOP.Analysis” section of this proxy statement, the Board asks our stockholders to vote FOR the adoption of the following resolution to be presented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2024:
(5) Includes 983 shares held inRESOLVED, that the 401(k) and ESOP.
Common stock beneficially owned asstockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of March 14, 2022, by all directors, director nominees, andthe Company’s named executive officers as a group, numbering 20 persons including those listed above,disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.
Although this advisory vote is 6,651,985 shares representing 1.2%not binding on the Board of Directors, the Board and the Compensation and Succession Committee will review and expect to take into account the outcome of the outstanding shares, of which 362,563 shares represent stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan for Nonemployee Directors, 4,762 shares are held in the 401(k) and ESOP, 4,530 shares are held in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan, 2,827,524 shares are unissued but are subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days, and no shares are subject to pledge.vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
| The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the advisory resolution on the compensation of our Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice. | |||||||
| ADM Proxy Statement |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Table of Contents
Section | Page | |||
| 34 | ||||
| 35 | ||||
| 40 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 42 | ||||
| 53 | ||||
| 54 | ||||
| 55 | ||||
Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits | 56 | |||
Our NEOs
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation of the following named executive officers, or NEOs:
Juan R. Luciano
Board Chair, Chief Executive Officer
and President
Years with ADM: 12
Vikram Luthar
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(on administrative leave)*
Years with ADM: 19
Regina Bynote Jones
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary**
Years with ADM: 1
Greg A. Morris
Senior Vice President and President,
Agricultural Services and Oilseeds
Years with ADM: 29
Christopher M. Cuddy
Senior Vice President and President, Carbohydrate Solutions
Years with ADM: 25
Vincent F. Macciocchi
Former Senior Vice President and President, Nutrition, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer***
Years with ADM: 11
| * | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
* Mr. Young transitioned from the role of Executive Vice President to Vice Chairman in February 2022.
** Includes tenure at a predecessor company that ADM acquired in 2014.
*** Mr. Taets previously served as President, Global Business Readiness and Procurement until June 2021.
Table of Contents
| ||
|
| ** | Ms. Jones joined the Company on September 5, 2023. |
| *** | Mr. Macciocchi was no longer an executive officer of the Company as of November 13, 2023, but remained employed by the Company in a transition support role to his successor until Mr. Macciocchi’s retirement from the Company on December 31, 2023. Mr. Macciocchi’s tenure included tenure at a predecessor company that ADM acquired in 2014. |
| 34 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Executive Summary |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
OUR COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
ADM unlocks the power of nature to enrich the quality of life and provide access to nutrition worldwide. ADM is a global leader in human and animal nutrition and one of the world’s premier agricultural origination and processing companies. In order to achieve this, we must attract, engage, and retain highly talented individuals who are committed to our core values of integrity, excellence, teamwork, resourcefulness, responsibility, and respect for others. Our compensation programs are designed to help us achieve our annual priorities while balancing the and long-term interests of our stockholders.priorities. Our compensation and benefit programs are based on the following objectives:
| • | Reinforce a high-performance culture—linking short- and long-term compensation with individual and Company performance; |
| • | Emphasize the long-term—structuring executive compensation to include a significant percentage of long-term equity awards; |
| • | Focus on results—rewarding executives for long-term stockholder value creation, excellence in leadership, and implementing our business strategy; |
| • | Remain market competitive—providing compensation that is consistent with the scope of responsibilities of the role with other comparable organizations to attract and retain high quality executive talent; and |
| • | Maintain internal equity—structuring compensation and benefit programs with consistent features for employees and executives across the organization. |
When designing our executive compensation programs, management and the Compensation and Succession Committee consider stockholder feedback received during our annual say-on-pay vote and regular engagement process.
20212023 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS1
In 2023, ADM achieved strong performance, overcoming multiple market and geopolitical challenges, including high cost inflation, supply chain bottlenecks, and the logistical and human challenges caused by the war in Ukraine. In the face of extraordinarythese challenges, during 2021. Despite the external environment, we kept our focus on strong execution, continuous improvement efforts, and delivering winning solutions for our customers.
Here are some highlights ADM achieved in 2021.2023.
Operating Profit $6.2B Achieved second best financial performance in company history, achieving $6.98 in adjusted earnings per share and $6.2 billion of adjusted segment operating profit. | Soybean and Renewable Fuels Advanced strategic initiatives, including completing the construction and commissioning of our new joint venture soybean processing complex in Spiritwood, North Dakota, which is providing feedstock to help meet the increasing demand for renewable fuels. | Dividend Increase +11% Delivered strong cash flows and balance sheet, which supported an 11% dividend increase, marking the 51st consecutive year of increases and 91 years of uninterrupted dividends. | Repurchases and Dividends $3.7B Maintained disciplined and balanced capital allocation, with $3.7 billion of cash returned to shareholders via repurchases and dividends. | |||||||||
KEY EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ACTIONS FOR 2023:
| • | Modest base salary changes—NEO salaries were increased 2% to 4% for most NEOs, reflecting appropriate competitive adjustments and a continued focus on |
We delivered an all-time record in adjusted earnings per share in 2021, significantly higher than 2020’s record earnings. We also delivered adjusted return on invested capital (adjusted ROIC) over our annual weighted average cost of capital (WACC) by almost 500 basis points and generated positive economic value added. Highlights of our 2021 financial performance include:
| • | Earned incentives on strong company performance—Earned annual incentive for 2023 was between 95.9% and 120.9% of target for NEOs, reflecting strong performance versus preestablished company-wide goals for EBITDA, ROIC, and several strategic objectives including 1ADM related milestones and innovation goals; and |
Earned LTI for long-term results—Earned performance share units (PSUs) for 2021-2023 were based on results versus preestablished goals for ROIC (50%), CAGR Nutrition operating profit growth (50%) and a relative TSR modifier; the above maximum performance on the ROIC metric was averaged with no payout on the Nutrition metric, resulting in an earned number of PSUs at 100% of target. While relative TSR performance results would have produced a positive modifier to the award, the Compensation and Succession Committee exercised negative discretion and did not adjust the number of PSUs earned for such modifier. |
| 1 | Adjusted Earnings Per Share (earnings per share, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items), Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items), and adjusted segment operating profit (segment operating profit excluding certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Annex A to this Proxy Statement offers more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures. |
| ADM Proxy Statement |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Executive Summary |
OVERVIEW OF OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Total direct compensation for ADM executives is delivered through a mix of cash and equity awards that emphasizes multiple performance factors tied to stockholder value creation over short and long-term time horizons. The three key elements of our compensation program are base salary, annual cash incentive awards, and long-term equity incentive (LTI) awards.
We believe our salaries and performance-based annual cash incentive awards encourage and reward annual business results, while maintaining a focus on companyCompany specific strategic goals. In contrast, ourOur LTI program rewards for sustained performance against critical performance metrics. Our executive stock ownership guidelines (discussed under “Compensation Policies and Governance — Governance—Executive Stock Ownership”), which require executives to own meaningful amounts of ADM common stock, align our executives’ interests in delivering sustainable stockholder returns.
SIGNIFICANT 20212023 COMPENSATION ACTIONS
In 2021, we granted2023, our CEO received a mixbase salary increase of performance share units (PSUs) and time-based restricted stock units (RSUs) to the NEOs. The PSUs will vest
based on ADM’s performance against specific goals over a three-year performance period that will end on December 31, 2023. The RSUs generally will vest on the same day as the vesting4%. One of the PSUs ifother NEOs received a base salary increase of 2% and another NEO received a base salary increase of 3.3%. The base salaries of the recipient remains employed by ADM.remaining NEOs were unchanged in 2023. For details, see “2021“2023 Executive Compensation Decisions — Equity-Based Long-Term Incentives.Decisions—Individual Compensation Decisions.” In 2023, the NEOs received, on average, 59% of their total target direct compensation in performance-based pay, and 74% of their total target direct compensation in equity awards. For these purposes, we consider the base salary paid in 2023, the target annual cash incentive for 2023, and the target award value of equity (the dollar amount of such awards as approved by the Compensation and Succession Committee) granted in 2023 for the 2023-2025 performance period.
Similar toAs in recent years, for the 20212023 annual cash incentive plan, the Compensation and Succession Committee retained adjusted EBITDA and adjusted ROIC as two of the performance metrics, and also selected fourthree specific and relevant strategic goals in order to drive accountability for important 20212023 annual priorities. For details on the fourthree strategic goals prescribed for the 20212023 annual bonuses, see “2021“2023 Executive Compensation Decisions — 2021Decisions—2023 Annual Cash Incentives.”
In 2021, two of the NEOs received a base salary increase of 3.7%. The base salaries of the other NEOs were unchanged in 2021. For details, see “2021 Executive Compensation Decisions — Individual Compensation Decisions.” In 2021, the NEOs received, on average, 58% of their total direct compensation in performance-based pay, and 64% of their total direct compensation in equity awards. For these purposes, we consider the base salary paid in 2021, the annual cash incentive earned in 2021 (paid in early 2022), and the target award value of equity (the dollar amount of such awards as approved by2023, the Compensation and Succession Committee)Committee granted earlyannual equity awards in 2021 for the 2021-2023form of 60% performance share units (PSUs) and 40% time-based restricted stock units (RSUs) to the NEOs. The PSUs will vest based on ADM’s performance against specific goals over a three-year performance period that will end on December 31, 2025. The RSUs will vest one-third each year over a three-year period. For details, see “2023 Executive Compensation Decisions—Equity-Based Long-Term Incentives.”
The charts below present the mix of total target direct compensation awarded to the NEOs in 2021.2023. For Ms. Jones, the “Average Other NEOs Pay Mix” chart reflects her 2023 base salary and target annual incentive bonus on an annualized basis, and excludes her one-time make-whole replacement cash incentive and equity award.
 |  |
| 36 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Executive Summary |
EXECUTIVE OFFICER TRANSITIONS IN 2023
1 Revenue on a constant currency basis (revenue adjusted for the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates), adjusted earnings per share (earnings per share, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items), Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) and Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordanceIn connection with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Annex A to this Proxy Statement offers more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures. In 2019,Ms. Jones’ appointment, the Compensation and Succession Committee chose to recognize $27 million in Adjusted EBITDA due to our anticipated collectionapproved the following elements of reimbursement for our losses caused by a third party shipping accident at our Reserve, Louisiana facility. We did not collect this reimbursement in 2020 and therefore it was not deducted from the calculation performed in connection with our 2020 annual cash incentive. In 2021, this reimbursement was collected and, as such, the $27 million was deducted from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA in connection with our 2021 annual cash incentive awards so as not to double-count the effects of such adjustment.Ms. Jones’ compensation:
| • | an initial annual base salary of $725,004, |
| • | one-time make-whole awards, intended to replace the cash incentives and unvested equity awards that Ms. Jones forfeited from her prior employer to join the Company: |
| • | cash incentive: $630,000 payable in March 2024 (to replace the portion of annual bonus forfeited upon departure), |
| • | equity award: approximate grant date value of $3,320,000 granted in the form of RSUs, vesting 50% each year on the first and second anniversaries of the September 5, 2023 grant date (to replace the value of unvested equity awards forfeited upon departure), |
| • | participation in the Company’s 2023 annual cash incentive plan at a target opportunity of 100% of her base salary, prorated based upon her start date with the Company, |
| • | an annual equity award with an approximate grant date value of $2,300,000, granted in the form of 60% PSUs with the same terms as the Company’s annual 2023 PSU awards for the other executive officers, and 40% RSUs, vesting one-third each year over a three-year period following the September 5, 2023 grant date, and |
| • | a $200,000 relocation assistance lump sum payment. |
On November 10, 2023, we announced that Vincent F. Macciocchi, our Senior Vice President, President, Nutrition, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer of the Company, would be retiring, effective December 31, 2023. Effective as of November 13, 2023, Mr. Macciocchi was no longer an executive officer, but he remained employed by the Company until December 31, 2023. There were no changes to Mr. Macciocchi’s compensation between November 13, 2023 and December 31, 2023. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable award agreements, upon his retirement on December 31, 2023, Mr. Macciocchi’s outstanding equity awards (other than the retention performance-based RSUs (the PRSUs) granted to him in 2022 which were forfeited upon his retirement) continue to vest in accordance with their original vesting schedule.
| ADM Proxy Statement |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Executive Summary |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES
We annually evaluate all elements of NEO pay to ensure alignment with performance objectives, market best practices, and stockholder interests. In addition, ADM’s lead director,Lead Director, our CEO, and other members of managementour Chief People Officer (CPO) annually engage with the company’sCompany’s largest institutional stockholders to receive their feedback on the structure and performance focus of our executive compensation programs. The following table summarizes our current practices.
What We Do | What We Don’t Do | |
✓ Pay-for-performance:We tie compensation to performance by setting clear and challenging | X No guaranteed base salary increases:Base salary levels | |
✓ Multipleperformance metrics: Payouts of our annual cash incentives and long-term incentives are determined based on the weighted results for several financial performance measures and structured to balance accountability for driving annual results with sustainable long-term performance. | X No prohibit executives from engaging in hedging | |
✓ Aggressivestock ownership and retention requirements: Our NEOs and directors must comply with rigorous stock ownership requirements, and they may not sell any | X No taxes owed as a result of their compensation. | |
✓ Compensation-relatedrisk review: The Compensation and Succession Committee regularly reviews compensation-related risks, with the assistance of independent consultants, to confirm that any such risks are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. | X No Company chartered aircraft. | |
✓ Clawbackpolicy: The restatement. | X No pledging: We prohibit executives from pledging ADM | |
✓ Regularreview of proxy advisor policies, stockholder feedback and corporate governance best practices: The Compensation and Succession Committee regularly considers the perspectives of outside authorities as they relate to our executive compensation programs. | X No do not have an employment | |
✓ Performance-basedequity awards: |
| |
✓ Double-trigger requirement: Equity awards do not automatically vest in the event of a change in control. Instead, we impose a “double-trigger” requirement to accelerate vesting. | ||
| ||
| 38 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Executive Summary |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
How Executive Compensation is Determined
ADVISORY “SAY ON PAY” VOTE
At the 20212023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 86%94% of the shares voted in the advisory vote on executive compensation voted to approve our executive compensation. The Compensation and Succession Committee believes that this strong level of support, and the strong levels of support shown in prior years, affirms broad stockholder agreement with our pay-for-performance approach to executive compensation.
We routinely conduct extensive proactive outreach to our largest institutional stockholders to understand and address issues of interest and to foster long-term cooperative relationships. The Compensation and Succession Committee will continue to consider stockholder feedback and the results from advisory votes on executive compensation when approving compensation programs. For more information, see “Stockholder Outreach and Engagement.”
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 39 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — How Executive Compensation is Determined |
How Executive Compensation is Determined
THE ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION AND SUCCESSION COMMITTEE
The Compensation and Succession Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors, is responsible for establishing ADM’s compensation philosophy and developing and administering compensation policies and programs consistent with this philosophy. When making compensation decisions, the Compensation and Succession Committee considers the company’s executive compensation objectives described below.
Align executive and stockholder interests. We believe that a substantial portion of total compensation should be delivered in the form of equity in order to align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our stockholders. Our RSU awards typically vest three years from the date of grant. Our PSU awards typically have a three-year performance period and vest only if certain performance goals are achieved.
We also protect our stockholders’ interest by including a clawback provision in agreements for long-term incentive awards to enable the company to recover awards if the recipient engages in any of a broad range of prohibited conduct, including violation of post-vesting non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions.
Enable the company to attract and retain top executive talent. Stockholders benefit when we attract, retain, and motivate talented executives with compensation packages that are competitive and fair. As a large, global company engaged in multiple lines of business, our competition for talent — like our competition for business and investment — is broad. The company’s compensation program for NEOs delivers a mix of salary, annual cash incentives, and long-term incentives targeted to be market-competitive.
Reflect the company’s results. Our executive compensation program emphasizes variable, performance-based pay. The Compensation and Succession Committee assesses executive compensation packages in the aggregate, and considers each individual component as well. Base salary is reviewed annually. Annual cash incentives are paid if, and to the extent that, specified corporate goals and individual goals are attained. Performance-based equity compensation is assessed in a similar manner and is designed to reward measurable long-term results.
Internal equity. The Compensation and Succession Committee takes into account internal equity when determining the pay of the CEO and other NEOs. We provide the Committee with data on the compensation of other ADM non-executive employees in other pay grades and/or salary ranges, and the Committee reviews such data when setting CEO and NEO pay.
THE ROLE OF THE BOARD
The Board approves the company’s business plan, which is one of the factors used to set financial and business objectives for incentive compensation. The independent directors establish and approve all performance criteria for evaluating the Chairman and CEO, annually evaluate the performance of the Chairman and CEO based on these criteria, and ratify his compensation. The board also may provide input and ratification on any additional compensation-related issues at the Compensation and Succession Committee’s request. The Board conducts an annual review of the company’s performance, which informs the calculation of performance-based incentives and decisions regarding compensation packages generally.
| THE ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION AND SUCCESSION COMMITTEE | |
The Compensation and Succession Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors, is responsible for establishing ADM’s compensation philosophy and developing and administering compensation policies and programs consistent with this philosophy. When making compensation decisions, the Compensation and Succession Committee considers the Company’s executive compensation objectives described below. Align executive and stockholder interests. We believe that a substantial portion of total compensation should be delivered in the form of equity in order to align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our stockholders. Our PSU awards have a three-year performance period and vest only if certain performance goals are achieved. We protect our stockholders’ interest by including clawback provisions in long-term incentive award agreements. The current provisions provide for forfeiture of awards or the ability of the Company to recover shares received in respect of awards (or their value) if the recipient breaches certain non-competition, non-solicitation or confidentiality restrictions, engages in certain prohibited conduct, and in the case of certain types of terminations of employment. We have a separate clawback policy that provides for the recovery of all erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation, which is any compensation that is granted, earned, or vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a financial reporting measure, received by our executive officers during the applicable lookback period, in the case of an accounting restatement. Attract and retain top executive talent. Stockholders benefit when we attract, retain, and motivate talented executives with compensation packages that are competitive and fair. As a large, global company engaged in multiple lines of business, our competition for talent—like our competition for business and investment—is broad. The Company’s compensation program for NEOs delivers a mix of salary, annual cash incentives, and long-term incentives targeted to be market-competitive. Pay-for-performance. Our executive compensation program emphasizes variable, performance-based pay. The Compensation and Succession Committee assesses executive compensation packages in the aggregate, and considers each individual component as well. Base salary is reviewed annually. Annual cash incentives are paid if, and to the extent that, specified corporate goals and individual goals are attained. Performance-based equity compensation is assessed in a similar manner and is designed to reward measurable long-term results. Internal equity. The Compensation and Succession Committee takes into account internal equity when determining the pay of the CEO and other NEOs. We provide the Committee with data on the compensation of other ADM non-executive employees in other pay grades and/or salary ranges, and the Committee reviews such data when setting CEO and other NEO pay. | |
q | |
| THE ROLE OF THE BOARD | |
The Board reviews and approves the Company’s annual and long-term business plans, which include some of the factors used to set financial and business objectives for incentive compensation. The independent directors establish and approve all performance criteria for evaluating the Board Chair and CEO, annually evaluate the performance of the Board Chair and CEO based on these criteria, and ratify his compensation. The Board also may provide input and ratification on any additional compensation-related issues at the Compensation and Succession Committee’s request. The Board conducts an annual review of the Company’s performance, which informs the calculation of performance-based incentives and decisions regarding compensation packages generally. | |
q | |
| THE ROLE OF THE INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT | |
For 2023, the Compensation and Succession Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian) as its independent executive compensation consultant. Meridian reports directly to the Compensation and Succession Committee, and provides objective and expert analyses and independent advice on executive and director compensation, and other matters in support of the Committee’s responsibilities. Each Compensation and Succession Committee meeting includes an executive session where the Committee meets privately with the independent consultant, without Company management. Outside of these sessions, the independent consultant interacts with management solely on behalf of the Compensation and Succession Committee. The Compensation and Succession Committee only retains consultants that it believes will provide independent advice. The Committee has assessed the independence of Meridian pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules, and concluded that the work Meridian has performed and is expected to perform in the future does not raise any conflict of interest. | |
q | |
| THE ROLE OF EXECUTIVES | |
Our Board Chair and CEO assists the Compensation and Succession Committee in determining compensation for the NEOs other than himself. To that end, the Board Chair and CEO assesses the performance of each of the other NEOs, both in terms of individual execution and with respect to the functions or business units they oversee. The Board Chair and CEO also recommends to the Compensation and Succession Committee, but does not vote on, annual base salary adjustments, individual and group performance factors, and short- and long-term incentive award target levels for the other NEOs. The Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer (CPO) oversees all employee compensation with the oversight and direction of the Compensation and Succession Committee. The CPO prepares most of the materials for the Compensation and Succession Committee meetings and provides analyses that assist the Committee with its decisions, such as summaries of competitive market practices, summaries of the Company’s succession management, and reports regarding the Company’s performance. In addition, throughout the year, the CPO facilitates meetings with management to help the Compensation and Succession Committee gain a better understanding of Company performance, and ensures that the Committee receives a rigorous assessment of year-to-date performance at each of its meetings. The Company’s executives, including the Board Chair and CEO, leave meetings during discussions of individual compensation actions affecting them personally and during all executive sessions, unless requested to remain by the Compensation and Succession Committee. |
| 40 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Components of Executive Compensation |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Components of Executive Compensation
THE ROLE OF THE INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
In determining 2021 executive compensation, the Compensation and Succession Committee received information and reports initially from Pay Governance, LLC, an independent compensation consultant retained by the Committee in 2010. In mid-2021, the Compensation and Succession Committee initiated a search for a new compensation consultant. After a thorough process which included a review of multiple firms, the Compensation and Succession Committee ultimately engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian) as its new independent compensation consultant. References in this section and elsewhere in the compensation disclosures to the Compensation and Succession Committee’s compensation consultant refer to the consultant engaged during the relevant period, with Pay Governance serving as the consultant for approximately the first three quarters of 2021 and Meridian serving as the consultant for the remainder of 2021.
Each of the compensation consultants provided data, analyses, and advice to the Compensation and Succession Committee, including market information that the Committee used when determining whether our executive compensation is competitive, commensurate with the executive’s responsibilities and consistent with market trends in executive compensation practices for companies in our industry. Neither consultant provided services to us other than consulting services related to the compensation and benefits of our directors, officers, and employees. The Compensation Committee has considered the adviser independence factors pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules as they relate to Pay Governance and Meridian, and does not believe either’s work in 2021 raised a conflict of interest.
THE ROLE OF EXECUTIVES
Our Chairman and CEO assists the Compensation and Succession Committee in determining compensation for the NEOs other than himself. To that end, the Chairman and CEO assesses the performance of each of the other NEOs, both in terms of individual execution and with respect to the functions or business units they oversee. The Chairman and CEO also recommends to the Compensation and Succession Committee, but does not vote on, annual base salary adjustments, individual and group performance factors, and short- and long-term incentive award target levels for the other NEOs.
The company’s Senior Vice President of Human Resources oversees all employee compensation with the oversight and direction of the Compensation and Succession Committee. The individual in that role prepares most of the materials for the Compensation and Succession Committee meetings and provides analyses that assist the committee with its decisions, such as summaries of competitive market practices, summaries of the company’s succession-planning actions, and reports regarding the company’s performance. In addition, throughout the year, the Senior Vice President of Human Resources facilitates meetings with management to help the Compensation and Succession Committee gain a better understanding of company performance, and ensures that the committee receives a rigorous assessment of year-to-date performance at each of its meetings. The company’s executives leave meetings during discussions of individual compensation actions affecting them personally and during all executive sessions, unless requested to remain by the Compensation and Succession Committee.
Components of Executive Compensation
The company’sCompany’s executive compensation program is built on a structure that emphasizes both short- and long-term performance. We believe our salaries and performance-based annual cash incentive awards encourage and reward annual business results, while our LTI awards reward sustained performance, particularly when coupled with our stock ownership requirements.
When setting compensation levels, the Compensation and Succession Committee refers to data regarding compensation for comparable executives at large public companies with which ADM competes for executive talent. As described in greater detail below under the heading “Peer Group,” the Compensation and Succession Committee chose a broad external market peer group inof the S&P 100 Index in
order to capture a wide spectrum of compensation levels. In addition, the Compensation and Succession Committee considers company-wideCompany-wide internal equity when determining pay packages for the NEOs.
The following chart summarizes the direct compensation components and associated objectives of our fixed and performance-based pay for executives in 2021.2023. Although the Compensation and Succession Committee has not adopted a policy for allocating the various elements of total direct compensation, the companyCompany places greater emphasis on variable pay for executives with more significant responsibilities because they have a greater capacity to affect the company’sCompany’s performance and results.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Components of 2023 Executive Compensation
Components of Executive Compensation
| Element and Form | Link to Stockholder Value | Key Characteristics | ||||||||
FIXED | Annual | |||||||||
Base Salary | Recognize an individual’s role and responsibilities | Reviewed annually and set based on competitiveness versus the external market, individual performance, and internal equity | ||||||||
| ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARDS | Annual | Annual Cash Incentive | Achieve annual goals measured in terms of financial, strategic, and individual performance linked to creation of stockholder value | Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted ROIC, Strategic Goals focused on Productivity, 1ADM, and Innovation, and Individual Performance Factor | ||||||
| LONG-TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS | Long-Term | Performance Share Units (PSUs)
|
|
Align long-term performance with interests of stockholders and retain executive talent | Achievement of key drivers of Company performance and stockholder value as evidenced by average Adjusted ROIC, cumulative Adjusted Earnings per Share, and an ESG modifier that is based on results in two ESG areas | |||||
| Long-Term | Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) 40% | Align NEOs’ interests with stockholders’ interests, retain executive talent, and promote stock ownership | RSUs are granted pursuant to the | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
SALARY
The Compensation and Succession Committee sets base salaries based on an executive’s position, skills, performance, experience, tenure, and responsibilities. The Compensation and Succession Committee annually assesses the competitiveness of base salary levels relative to salaries within the marketplace for similar executive positions, typically using a range around the market median as a starting point. When assessing any salary adjustments for executives, the Compensation and Succession Committee also considers factors such as changes in responsibilities and corresponding changes in competitive marketplace levels. In 2021, each of2023, Mr. Macciocchi and Mr. MorrisLuciano received a base salary increase of 3.7% based on4%, Mr. Luthar received a base salary increase of 3.3%, and Mr. Cuddy received a base salary increase of 2%, in each case to strengthen market competitiveness. None of the other NEOs received a base salary increase in 2021.2023.
ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE
We pay an annual cash incentive only if ADM meets specified performance goals. The annual cash incentive program emphasizes company-widecompany- wide performance objectives to encourage executives to focus on overall companyCompany success and leadership to generate the most value across the organization. Our assessment of company
performance ismetrics are directly tied to driving stockholder expectations:value creation: we require meaningful results for forward-lookingannual metrics before any awards may be earned.
The 20212023 annual cash incentive program was based on two key measures of financial performance — performance—adjusted EBITDA and adjusted ROIC —ROIC— with final awards also reflecting the Compensation and Succession Committee’s approval of performance results related to the fourthree strategic companyCompany goals set forth in the table above, as well as individual performance. Cash incentive awards for 20212023 were paid in the first quarter of 2022.2024.
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 41 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — 2023 Executive Compensation Decisions |
LTI AWARDS
Our 2023 long-term equity awards are based on companyCompany and market factors, including relative total stockholder return and achievement of financial milestones.milestones and a two-goal ESG modifier. The LTI awards granted in 20212023 are part performance-based and part time-based, with an equala mix of 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs, to ensure that NEOs’ interests are aligned with the interests of our stockholders. LTI awards were granted to the NEOs in February 2021.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
20212023 Executive Compensation Decisions
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
INDIVIDUAL COMPENSATION DECISIONS
The following tables summarize compensation decisions made by the Compensation and Succession Committee with respect to each of the NEOs for 2021.2023. Details regarding the specific compensation elements and related payouts follow the individual summaries.
The award values shown below for LTI grants represent the dollar amount of such awards, at target, as approved by the Compensation and Succession Committee. These amounts differ from the grant date fair values of such awards as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and the Summary Compensation Table due to the valuation methodology the Compensation and Succession Committee uses in making its decisions differing from the valuation methodology required by the SEC for thethose compensation tables.
MR. LUCIANO
| ||||
 |
Target annual cash incentive Actual annual cash incentive Long-term incentives |
| ||||
| 200% of base salary, or $3,609,611, or approximately 242% of base salary $17,700,000, granted in the form of 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs |
Significant accomplishments:
| • | Delivered second highest financial results, including adjusted earnings per share of $6.98; adjusted segment operating profit of $6.2 billion; and 12.2% adjusted ROIC.2 |
| • | Maintained strong balance sheet while returning $3.7 billion in cash to stockholders and increased dividend payout by 11%. |
| • | Advanced strategic initiatives that are serving our customers’ evolving needs, from launching regenerative agriculture in South America and Europe, to commissioning our joint venture oilseed facility in North Dakota, to expanding our starch capacity to serve customer needs across food and industrial products. |
| • | Achieved important milestones in corporate responsibility and sustainability, including advancing our decarbonization strategy with projects such as the Tallgrass CCS pipeline and Broadwing Energy, which will help bolster ADM’s ability to serve growing demand for low-carbon solutions. |
| 2 | Adjusted earnings per share (earnings per share, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items), Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) and Adjusted segment operating profit (segment operating profit excluding certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with GAAP. Annex A to this Proxy Statement offers more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures. |
| 42 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — 2023 Executive Compensation Decisions |
MR. LUTHAR Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (on administrative leave) |
 | Base salary Target annual cash incentive Actual annual cash incentive Long-term incentives | Increased from $750,000 to $775,008 100% of base salary, | ||
| or $775,000
| As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation and Succession Committee had not made a determination on Mr. Luthar’s annual cash incentive since he remained on administrative leave $ |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
 | Base salary
Actual annual cash incentive Replacement cash incentive Long-term incentives | Hired at $725,004 100% of $292,237, or approximately 121% of prorated base salary One-time sign-on replacement cash incentive payment of $630,000, paid in March 2024 $2,300,000, granted in the form of 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs; one-time sign-on replacement award of $3,320,000 granted in the form of RSUs |
Significant accomplishments:
| • | Appointed Chief Integrity Officer with |
| • | Refreshed and enhanced Code of Conduct to |
| • | Strengthened Regional and Business Unit Legal alignment to mitigate risk and fortify enterprise resilience. |
| • | Actively engaged in outreach conversations with investors and other stakeholders on
|
2 Adjusted earnings per share (earnings per share, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items), Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) and Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with GAAP. Annex A to this Proxy Statement offers more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures. In 2019, the Compensation and Succession Committee chose to recognize $27 million in Adjusted EBITDA due to our anticipated collection of reimbursement for our losses caused by a third party shipping accident at our Reserve, Louisiana facility. We did not collect this reimbursement in 2020 and therefore it was not deducted from the calculation performed in connection with our 2020 annual cash incentive. In 2021, this reimbursement was collected and, as such, the $27 million was deducted from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA in connection with our 2021 annual cash incentive awards so as not to double-count the effects of such adjustment.
| ADM Proxy Statement |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — 2023 Executive Compensation Decisions |
| ||||
|
| |||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
Senior Vice President and President, Agricultural Services and Oilseeds
| ||||
 | Base salary Target annual cash incentive Actual annual cash incentive Long-term incentives | Unchanged at $714,000 100% of base salary, or $714,000 $863,405, or approximately 121% of base salary $3,200,000, granted in the form of 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs |
Significant accomplishments:
| • | Led Agricultural Services and Oilseeds to the second best year in terms of operating profit and ROIC. |
| • | Delivered exceptional risk management in a year of significant market volatility. |
| • | Completed the construction and commissioning of the crushing complex in Spiritwood, North Dakota, which is operated as Green Bison Soy Processors, a JV between ADM and Marathon Petroleum. |
| • | Scaled-up ADM’s Regenerative Agriculture program globally with a significant year-over-year increase in total acres enrolled. |
MR. CUDDY Senior Vice President and President, Carbohydrate Solutions |
 | Base salary Target annual cash incentive Actual annual cash incentive Long-term incentives | Increased from $650,004 to $663,000 100% of base salary, or $663,000 $801,733, or approximately 121% of base salary $3,100,000, granted in the form of 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs |
Significant accomplishments:
| • | Achieved third best performance year with record earnings in North America Starch and Corn Syrups, and Global Wheat Milling. |
| • | Grew our BioSolutions platform by $268M in year-over-year revenue growth and 20% in year-over-year contribution margin growth. |
| • | Announced strategic partnership with Solugen to meet increasing demand for sustainable products with a new production facility adjacent to ADM’s Marshall, Minnesota corn complex. |
| • | Advanced key decarbonization initiatives by finalizing agreements with Tallgrass to enable carbon dioxide transportation by pipeline in Columbus, Nebraska and with Broadwing to provide a new heat and energy source in Decatur, Illinois. |
| 44 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — 2023 Executive Compensation Decisions |
MR. MACCIOCCHI Former Senior Vice President, President, Nutrition, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer (Retired as of December 31, 2023) |
 | Base salary
Actual annual cash incentive Long-term incentives |
| ||||
| 100% of base salary, or | |||||
| $714,000
| $ | |||||
| $ | |||||
| ||||||
| ||||
|
| |||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
3 Revenue on a constant currency basis is a financial measure that has not been calculated in accordance with GAAP). Annex A to this Proxy Statement offers a more detailed definition of this term, a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosure about the use of this non-GAAP financial measure.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
| ||||
 |
| |||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
20212023 ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVESINCENTIVE
The annual cash incentive program aligns rewards with business results measured against specific strategic goals. At the start of each fiscal year, the Compensation and Succession Committee approves target annual cash incentive levels, expressed as a percentage of salary, for each NEO. Actual awards paid are based on both companyCompany performance (75% weight) and individual performance (25% weight). Payouts can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% depending on both companyCompany and individual performance.
COMPANY PERFORMANCE COMPONENTSCompany Performance Components
Company performance payout is determined by ADM’s adjusted EBITDA, our results on a set of strategic goals, and our adjusted return on invested capital (ROIC).43
Adjusted EBITDA
As a threshold matter, adjusted EBITDA must exceed $2.0 billion for payout to occur. If adjusted EBITDA for 2021 had been less than $2.0 billion, ADM would not have paid any annual incentives to the NEOs. If adjusted EBITDA for 2021 had been between $2.0 billion and $3.22 billion, the Compensation and Succession Committee would have had discretion to determine whether any payouts under the annual incentive plan would occur, and if so, the amounts of such payouts.
4Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted to excludehas an aggregate weighting of 50% under our 2023 annual cash incentive program. The Company sets the impact of certain items) and Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to excludeEBITDA target based upon the impact of certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with GAAP, and are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures. Annex A to this Proxy Statement provides more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each toCompany plan for the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures aboutyear, which also considers the use of these non-GAAP financial measures.external environment.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
If adjusted EBITDA for 2021 was above $3.22 billion, then an initial payout opportunity amount would be determined based on actual adjusted EBITDA results. The adjusted EBITDA goals and associated payout opportunity levels are shown below. Payout opportunity levels are interpolated for results that fall between specific goal amounts.
Adjusted EBITDA Achieved | Payout Opportunity | ||||
$7.1B & Above | 200% | ||||
$6.8B | 150% | ||||
$6.6B | 125% | ||||
$5.85B (Plan Adjusted EBITDA) | 100% | ||||
$5.333B | 75% | ||||
$4.917B | 50% | ||||
$4.5B | 25% | ||||
$4.49B & Below | 0% | ||||
| 3 | Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) and Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with GAAP, and are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures. Annex A to this Proxy Statement provides more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures. |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 45 |
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
Strategic Goals
Under the company performance componentOur strategic goals have an aggregate weighting of 25% under our 20212023 annual cash incentive program the initial payout amount determined by actual adjusted EBITDA results as described above could be adjusted upward based onfollows:
Productivity. This metric relates to optimization of throughput at our North America facilities, measured as the company’s achievements of four equally-weighted strategic goals, each adding 5% to the initial payout amount if achieved:
Nutrition Adjusted Operating Profit Growth. ADM must realize an increase of 15% in year-over-year adjusted operating profit of the Nutrition reporting segment.
Safety. ADM must achieve a 10% year-over-year reduction in unscheduled downtime, while reducing serious injuries and fatalities (SIFs)., with a threshold of 5% reduction, a target of 20% reduction, and a maximum of 30% reduction. (7.5% weight)
1ADM. ADM mustThis metric relates to the achievement of critical go-lives and related milestones for SuccessFactors and SAP related initiatives, with a threshold of achieving either the SuccessFactors 4.3B or SAP 5.2 Flavors EMEA go-live on time, a target of achieving both go-lives on time, and a maximum of achieving both go-lives and exiting hyper care on time. (7.5% weight)
Innovation. This metric has two separate sub-goals, each weighted at 5%: (1) deliver first pilottotal global regenerative agriculture acres, with a threshold of 1ADM Core SAP solution1.5 million acres, a target of 1.75 million acres, and a maximum of 2.0 million acres, and (2) deliver on decarbonization goal for our Decatur complex by signing imperative agreements to first 3 Flavors locationsadvance strategy, with a threshold of signing agreement with Broadwing for a new heat and energy source in Europe.Decatur, IL, a target of signing agreements with both Broadwing and Tallgrass, and a maximum of signing agreements with Broadwing and Tallgrass and submitting EPA well permit applications. (10% weight)
Readiness. Readiness, which isIn each case, threshold performance would result in a program50% payout, target performance would result in a 100% payout, and maximum performance would result in a 200% payout for that helps drive continuous improvement in our company particularly in execution, must achieve its bankable plan of $550 million of gross run-rate benefits.metric.
Adjusted ROIC MultiplierModifier
ROIC measures how effectively we are usinggenerate returns on invested capital.
As the last step in the companyCompany performance payout component of our 20212023 annual cash incentive program, actual adjusted ROIC for 20212023 is compared against the 7.0%10.0% adjusted ROIC target that was set for 2021, which represents the Company’s long term weighted average cost of capital.2023. The result of that comparison leads to a multipliermodifier of +/- 10%. In essence, the multiplierThe modifier boosts the payout potential in years that our adjusted ROIC exceeds our target, and reduces the payout potential if adjusted ROIC falls below target expectations.
The adjusted ROIC multipliermodifier is determined as follows:
Adjusted ROIC Achieved | |||||||||||||
| Effect of modifier on payout | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| 1.1 | ||||||||||||
| 10% increase | |||||||||||||
| 1.0 | No change | |||||||||||
8.0% or less | 0.9 | 10% decrease | |||||||||||
* For Adjusted ROIC results between specific goals, the multiplier will be determined by linear interpolation.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
20212023 Company Performance Payout Component Calculation
For 2021,2023, ADM attained the results shown below, leading to a companyan overall Company performance portion payout of 200.0%95.9% of target.
Our 2021 Adjusted2023 adjusted EBITDA of $4.88$6.207 billion represented 200.0%111.9% of our goal. Applying the weighting of adjusted EBITDA of 50% of the total annual cash incentive payout, this factor achieved a payout of 55.9%.
| 46 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Individual Performance Components |
In addition, 20%31.25% was added to the companyCompany performance portion of the payout as a result of the achievement of the strategic goals at the following levels:
Further, adjusted |
|
|
|
Further, Adjusted ROIC for 20212023 was 10.0%12.2%, resulting in a multiplier of 1.1.
Individual Performance Components
|
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMPONENTS
Individual performance determines 25% of the annual cash bonus.
Our leaders are responsible for driving performance company-wide; their respective individual performance ratings are a result of their performance against goals for the year, including goals for the business units they run. The target individual performance percentage is 25%. of the overall cash incentive program. For anyeach NEO, however, the Compensation and Succession Committee has discretion to adjust thispayout from 0% to 200% of the 25% target percentage by +/- 5% increments based on the committee’sCommittee’s assessment of the NEO’s performance and contribution to the company’sCompany’s success. As a result, individual payouts can range from a total payout of 0% to 50% (in 5 percentage point increments).
With the exception of Mr. Luthar and Mr. Macciocchi, the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
BasedSuccession Committee approved the 2023 individual performance percentages for the other NEOs at 25%, which reflects an overall reduction of 10% (relative to the level that would have been determined based on business results in 2021,2023 and the individual achievements summarized above under “Individual“2023 Executive Compensation Decisions—Individual Compensation Decisions,” which was 35%) due to, among other factors, the material weakness identified and 2023 safety performance. Mr. Macciocchi received no payout for his individual performance component due to the underperformance of the Nutrition business unit in 2023.
As a result, the Compensation and Succession Committee electeddetermined to award the following individual performance percentages to the NEOs:
| Individual Performance Percentages | ||||||
|
| % | ||||
V. Luthar | * | |||||
R. B. Jones | 25 | % | ||||
|
| % | ||||
C. M. Cuddy | 25 | % | ||||
| ||||||
|
| |||||
| 0 | ||||||
|
| |||||
The* As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation and Succession Committee considered the full board’s assessmenthad not made a determination regarding any payment to Mr. Luthar related to his 2023 annual cash incentive award since he remained on administrative leave.
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 47 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Individual Performance Components |
Calculation of the Chairman and CEO’s performance and full company performance when approving Mr. Luciano’s individual performance percentage.Award Amounts
CALCULATIONOF AWARD AMOUNTS
The formula used to calculate an annual cash incentive payout for the NEOs can be expressed as follows:
THE RESULTING ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVEFOR EACH NEOThe Resulting Annual Cash Incentive for Each NEO
Based on the determination of the companyCompany and individual performance factors as described above, the NEOs received the payouts set forth below.
Executive | Target Cash Incentive Opportunity (% of Salary) | Target Cash Incentive Opportunity ($) | Cash Bonus Payout Percentage | Actual FY2021 Cash Award | Target Cash Incentive Opportunity (% of Salary) | Target Cash Incentive Opportunity (% of Salary) | Target Cash Incentive Opportunity | Target Cash Incentive Opportunity | Cash Bonus Payout as a Percentage of target | Cash Bonus Payout as a Percentage of target | Actual FY2023 Cash Award | Actual FY2023 Cash Award | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 200% | $2,800,000 | 190% | $5,320,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. G. Young | 132% | $1,125,000 | 190% | $2,137,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones | 100 | % | $ | 241,668 | 120.9 | % | $ | 292,237 | ** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | 100% | $700,000 | 185% | $1,295,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | 100% | $700,000 | 190% | $1,330,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. D. Taets | 100% | $700,000 | 185% | $1,295,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * | As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation and Succession Committee had not made a determination regarding any payment to Mr. Luthar related to his 2023 annual cash incentive award since he remained on administrative leave. |
| ** | Ms. Jones received a prorated cash incentive award based on her start date of September 5, 2023. Her cash bonus payout percentage was applied to her prorated base salary for 2023. |
One-Time Bonus Approval
In addition, as described above, in connection with Ms. Jones’ appointment, the Compensation and Succession Committee approved a one-time sign-on bonus of $630,000, payable in March 2024, intended to replace the prorated annual cash incentive that Ms. Jones forfeited from her prior employer to join the Company.
| 48 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Equity-Based Long-Term Incentives |
EQUITY-BASED LONG-TERM INCENTIVES
ADM’s LTI program aligns the interests of executives with those of our stockholders by rewarding the creation of long-term stockholder value, supporting stock ownership, and motivating retention of our senior executives. Our performance-based LTI awards are based on the results of forward-looking metrics measured over a three-year performance period.
In 2021,2023, we dividedgranted our annual LTI awards equally betweenin February (or for Ms. Jones, in September) in the form of 60% performance share units (PSUs) with a three-year performance period, which PSUs will vest at the end of the three-year period only if certain performance goals are achieved, and 40% restricted stock units (RSUs) with three-year cliff vesting.a one-third ratable vesting schedule on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. We believe this forward-looking LTI program aligns our equity compensation with market practice and strengthens our executives’ focus on growth and future value creation for stockholders.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
The February 20212023 grants, including the sign-on equity award to Ms. Jones, in the target amounts approved by the Compensation and Succession Committee are shown below.
The listed values represent the dollar amount of such awards, at target, as approved by the Compensation and Succession Committee. These amounts differ from the grant date fair values of such awards as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and the Summary Compensation Table due to the valuation methodology the Compensation and Succession Committee uses in making its decisions differing from the valuation methodology required by the SEC for the compensation tables.
Executive | Target Equity Award | ||||
J. R. Luciano | $ | 17,700,000 | |||
V. Luthar | $ | 3,450,000 | |||
R. B. Jones | $ | 5,620,000 | (1) | ||
G. A. Morris | $ | 3,200,000 | |||
C. M. Cuddy | $ | 3,100,000 | |||
V. F. Macciocchi | $ | 3,200,000 | |||
| (1) | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
The terms of these equity awards are described below.
PSU VESTINGVesting
Except in cases that trigger accelerated vesting (described below), the 20212023 PSUs will vest in three years upon the Compensation and Succession Committee’s determination of the company’sCompany’s achievements, if any, against certain performance goals over a three-year performance period (2021–2023)(2023–2025). Payouts can range from 0% to 200%, and the value of those payouts will depend upon the price of ADM’s common stock at the end of the performance period. During the performance period, dividend equivalents will be accrued and settled in cash at the end of the three-year performance period on the basis of number of PSUs actually earned. Vested PSUs will be settled in shares of ADM common stock.
PSU PERFORMANCE METRICSPerformance Metrics
The performance metrics for the 20212023 PSU awards are:
| • | Average adjusted ROIC over the three-year performance period |
CAGR of Nutrition adjusted operating profit (OP) over the three-year performance period, and
| • | Cumulative adjusted earnings per share (“adjusted EPS”) performance over the three-year performance period5 (50% weight), and |
| 4 | Average adjusted ROIC for the performance period means the average of the annual percentage obtained by dividing the Adjusted ROIC earnings for each fiscal year during the performance period by Adjusted Invested Capital for the same fiscal year. For this purpose, Adjusted Invested Capital is the average of quarter-end amounts for the trailing four quarters, with each such quarter-end amount being equal to the sum of ADM’s stockholders’ equity (excluding non-controlling interests), interest-bearing liabilities, the after-tax effect of the LIFO reserve, and other specified adjustments as determined by the Compensation and Succession Committee to be appropriate. |
Relative TSR as compared to a defined peer group over the three-year performance period.
| 5 | Cumulative adjusted EPS for the performance period means the diluted earnings per share of the Company over the three-year performance period, as adjusted for losses/gains on sales of assets and businesses, impairment, restructuring and settlement charges, expenses related to acquisitions, gains/losses on debt extinguishment, losses/ gains on debt conversion option, tax adjustments, and such other adjustments determined by the Compensation and Succession Committee, in its sole discretion, to be appropriate in order to reflect the impact of significant unusual or nonrecurring events, including but not limited to material portfolio adjustments. |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 49 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Equity-Based Long-Term Incentives |
| • | A two-goal ESG modifier that reflects (1) progress toward gender diversity in leadership, and (2) absolute reduction in greenhouse gas emissions over the three-year performance period (+/-15%). |
ROIC appears as a metric in both our short- and long-term incentive compensation plans, but it serves different purposes and has different weights in the two plans. One-year adjusted ROIC in our annual cash incentive plan demonstrates our short-term performance, while three-yearthree- year average adjusted ROIC in the PSU award better reflects long-term, sustainable results with an emphasis on growth and driving consistent returnreturns of our capital investments over time.
The defined peer group against which TSR is compared is more focusedCommittee selected adjusted EPS as a performance metric for the 20212023 PSU awards than it was in prior years. This more focused peer group includes: Symrise AG, International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., Olam International Limited, Bunge Limited, Ingredion Incorporated, The Andersons, Inc., and Green Plains Inc.
5 “Adjusted ROIC”because adjusted EPS is one of the primary bases on which we set performance expectations for the performance period means the average of the annual percentage obtained by dividing the Adjusted ROIC Earnings for each fiscal year, during the Performance Period by Adjusted Invested Capital for the same fiscal year. For this purpose, Adjusted Invested Capitalit is the average of quarter-end amounts for the trailing four quarters,consistent with each such quarter-end amount being equalhow we report our operating results to the suminvestment community, it is a widely-used measure of ADM’s stockholders’ equity (excluding non-controlling interests), interest-bearing liabilities,overall Company performance, and the after-tax effect of the LIFO reserve, and other specified adjustments as determined by the Compensation and Succession Committee believes it is highly correlated to be appropriate.stockholder return.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
The goals and associated payouts for these metrics are shown below. If results for average adjusted ROIC and CAGR of Nutrition adjusted OPEPS fall between specific goals, the associated payout will be determined by linear interpolation.
Performance metric
| Weighting
| No payout
| 50% payout
| 100% payout
| 150% payout
| 175% payout
| 200% payout
| Weighting | No payout | 50% payout | 100% payout | 150% payout | 200% payout | |||||||||||||||
Average Adjusted ROIC | 50% | Below 5.75% | 6.5% | 7.0% | 7.5% | 8.0% | 9.0% or above | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average Adjusted ROIC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Adjusted ROIC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Adjusted ROIC | 50% | Below 7.0% | 8.5% | 10.0% | 11.0% | 12.0% or above | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CAGR of Nutrition Adjusted OP | 50% | Below 6% Growth | 8% Growth | 12% Growth | 15% Growth | n/a | 20% Growth | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Adjusted EPS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Adjusted EPS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Adjusted EPS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Adjusted EPS | 50% | Below $12.00 | $15.00 | $18.00 | $20.00 | $22.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Relative TSR Modifier | +/- 10% | Based on ranking that compares ADM’s 3-year TSR against defined peer group
1st Rank – 1.1 Modifier 2nd Rank – 1.067 Modifier 3rd Rank – 1.033 Modifier 4th & 5th Rank – 1.0 Modifier 6th Rank – 0.967 Modifier 7th Rank – 0.933 Modifier 8th Rank – 0.9 Modifier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESG Modifier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESG Modifier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESG Modifier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESG Modifier | +/-15% | +/- 7.5% modifier based on percent of women in leadership roles (“gender diversity percentage”) at 12/31/25 (with linear interpolation applied) -7.5% if gender diversity percentage is 23% or less 0% if gender diversity percentage is 26% +7.5% if gender diversity percentage is 29% or more
+/- 7.5% modifier based on level of achievement as it relates to a goal of 2.0% absolute reduction in greenhouse gas emissions during 2025 against 2019 Adjustment factor will be made based on Committee discretion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In establishing and measuring achievements against the goals shown above, the Compensation and Succession Committee retains discretion to make changes to reflect “material portfolio adjustments,” which are events that are unusual and infrequent, like significant acquisitions and divestitures. Absolute negative stock price will cap the modifier at 1.0, which equates to no change in payout.
RSU VESTINGVesting
Except in cases that trigger accelerated vesting (described below), RSUs vest three years afterone-third each year over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date so long as the recipient is still employed by the company.Company on each such vesting date. During the vesting period, participants are paid dividend equivalents on their unvested RSUs. Vested RSUs will be settled in shares of ADM common stock.
CONDITIONS LEADINGTO ACCELERATED VESTING
RSUs and PSUs will continue to vest as scheduled if an executive leaves the companyCompany because of disability or retirement (at age 55 or older with 10 or more years of service, or 65 years of age).
Conditions Leading to Accelerated Vesting
Upon the death of an executive, the executive’s RSUs will vest immediately and the executive’s PSUs will vest immediately at the target level. A detailed description of double-trigger change in control provisions that may lead to accelerated vesting appears under the header “Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits” below.Benefits.”
EQUITY AWARDS GRANTEDIN 2019WITHA PERFORMANCE PERIODTHAT ENDEDIN
| 50 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Equity-Based Long-Term Incentives |
Equity Awards Granted in 2021 with a Performance Period that Ended in 2023
In 2019,2021, ADM granted PSUs to our then-NEOs with a three-year performance period (2019-2021)(2021-2023). The 2019 PSUs provided that if our cumulative adjusted EBITDA for the performance period was less than $7.0 billion, no PSUs would be earned or vest. ADM’s cumulative adjusted EBITDA for 2019-2021 was $12.049 billion, and therefore, the threshold requirement was met.
The performance metrics for the 20192021 PSU awards were:
Relative TSR performance as compared to the companies in the S&P 100 Index over the three-year performance period,
Average adjusted ROIC over the three-year performance period, and
Cumulative adjusted EBITDA over the three-year performance period.
Average adjusted ROIC6 over the three-year performance period, |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
| • | Compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of Nutrition operating profit (“OP”) growth7 over the three-year performance period, and |
| • | Relative TSR as compared to a defined peer group over the three-year performance period. |
The defined peer group includes: Symrise AG, International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., Olam International Limited, Bunge Limited, Ingredion Incorporated, The Andersons, Inc., and Green Plains, Inc.
The weighting, goals, and associated payout factors for these metrics are shown below. For average adjusted ROIC and cumulative adjusted EBITDA,CAGR of Nutrition OP growth, if results were to fall between specific goals, the associated payout would be determined by linear interpolation.
Performance metric
| Weighting
| No payout
| 50%
| 75%
| 100%
| 150%
| 175%
| 200%
| ||||||||
| Relative TSR | 25% | Below 30th percentile | 30th percentile | Between 30th percentile and median | Median | Between median and top quartile | n/a | Top quartile | ||||||||
| Adjusted ROIC | 25% | Below 6.5% | 6.5% | n/a | 7.0% | 7.5% | 8.0% | 8.5% and above | ||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | 50% | Below $9.0 billion | $9.0 billion | n/a | $10.0 billion | $10.75 billion | n/a | $11.25 billion | ||||||||
Performance metric | Weighting | No payout | 50% payout | 100% payout | 150% payout | 175% payout | 200% payout | |||||||||
Average Adjusted ROIC | 50% | Below 5.75% | 6.5% | 7.0% | 7.5% | 8.0% | 9.0% or above | |||||||||
CAGR Nutrition OP Growth | 50% | Below 6% Growth | 8% Growth | 12% Growth | 15% Growth | n/a | 20% Growth | |||||||||
Relative TSR Modifier | +/-10% | Based on ranking that compares ADM’s 3-year TSR against defined peer group
1st Rank – 1.1 Modifier 2nd Rank – 1.067 Modifier 3rd Rank – 1.033 Modifier 4th & 5th Rank – 1.0 Modifier 6th Rank – 0.967 Modifier 7th Rank – 0.933 Modifier 8th Rank – 0.9 Modifier | ||||||||||||||
On February 2, 2022,March 18, 2024, the Compensation and Succession Committee determined the degree to which the performance metrics under the 20192021 PSUs were attained, and the resulting payout level relative to the target amount for each metric. For the performance period of 2019-2021:2021-2023:
| • |
|
Average adjusted ROIC was 8.4%, and therefore the resulting payout factor was 195%, and
| • |
|
| • | Relative TSR modifier was at a 3rd rank, yielding a 1.033 multiple. |
After thorough discussion and deliberation by the Compensation and Succession Committee, it approved an earned number of PSUs for each participant (other than Mr. Luthar) at 100% of target, which was based on the weighted performance results of the average adjusted ROIC metric and the CAGR of Nutrition operating profit growth metric. The Compensation and Succession Committee chose to exercise negative discretion and exclude the impact of the relative TSR modifier (noted above as 1.033) on the actual number of PSUs earned.
| 6 | Average adjusted ROIC for the performance period means the average of the annual percentage obtained by dividing the Adjusted ROIC earnings for each fiscal year during the performance period by Adjusted Invested Capital for the same fiscal year. For this purpose, Adjusted Invested Capital is the average of quarter-end amounts for the trailing four quarters, with each such quarter-end amount being equal to the |
The weightings applicable to each of the metrics were then applied to the percentage payout level for each metric, resulting in a weighted payout percentage of 167.5% of the target number of PSUs.
| 7 | CAGR of Nutrition OP growth for the performance period means the difference between (x) the Company’s annual Nutrition adjusted segment operating profit, as reflected in the Company’s earnings disclosures in its fourth quarter press release for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 and (y) the Company’s Nutrition adjusted segment 2020 operating profit. Average Compound Annual Growth Rate means dividing the value of the Company’s Nutrition adjusted segment operating profit at the end of the Performance Period (December 31, 2023) by the Company’s Nutrition adjusted segment 2020 operating profit, raising the result to an exponent of one divided by the number of years in the Performance Period, and subtracting one from the subsequent result. Average Compound Annual Growth Rate shall be approved by the Committee after the end of the Performance Period, at which time the Committee may, in its discretion, provided that one or more Material Portfolio Adjustments may be made to the same. |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 51 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Equity-Based Long-Term Incentives |
Based on these determinations, the Compensation and Succession Committee approved the following number of PSUs earned for each NEO pursuant to the 20192021 PSUs:
Executive | Target Number of 2019 PSUs | Actual Number of 2019 PSUs Earned | Target Number of 2021 PSUs | Target Number of 2021 PSUs | Actual Number of 2021 PSUs Earned | Actual Number of 2021 PSUs Earned | ||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 162,908 | 272,871 | ||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||
R. G. Young | 56,391 | 94,455 | ||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | ||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones** | ||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones** | ||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones** | ||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones** | ||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones** | ||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | ||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | ||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | 35,088 | 58,773 | ||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | 35,088 | 58,773 | ||||||||||||
J. D. Taets | 35,088 | 58,773 | ||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | ||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | ||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | ||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | ||||||||||||||
| * | As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation and Succession Committee had not made a determination related to the 2021 PSUs for Mr. Luthar since he remained on administrative leave. |
| ** | Ms. Jones was hired in 2023 and, therefore, did not receive a 2021 PSU award. |
All of the earned PSUs shown in the table above vested on February 14, 2022.March 18, 2024.
FEATURES OF 2024 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
6 Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) and Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) are financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with GAAP, and are referred to as non-GAAP financial measures. Annex A to this Proxy Statement provides more detailed definitions of these terms, a reconciliation of each to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of these non-GAAP financial measures.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2021 Executive Compensation Decisions
CHANGESTO 2022 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
The Compensation and Succession Committee made changes to the short-term and long-term incentive compensation plans for performance periods beginning in 2022.2024. These changes were designed to better align with the strategic direction of the company.Company, to simplify certain design features and to strengthen market competitiveness.
Changes to the 2022 annual cash incentive bonus included: lowering the weightingFeatures of the adjusted EBITDA performance factor from 100% of company performance to 50%; maintaining strategic goals with an aggregate weighting of 25% instead of them being additive to the total payout; and maintaining the +/- 10% ROIC modifier for continued focus on returns.
Changes to the 2022 PSU awards included: changing the weightings from 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs to 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs; introducing a new 50% metric of earnings per share; maintaining the adjusted ROIC metric at 50%; and increasing the impact of the modifier from +/- 10% to +/-15% and replacing the relative TSR metric for the modifier with a two-goal ESG metric: (1) progress toward gender parity, and (2) absolute reduction in greenhouse gas emissions over the three-year performance period.
The Committee may consider the effects of a global pandemic and other economic and environmental pressures negatively impacting results.
In addition, in February 2022, the Compensation and Succession Committee increased our stock ownership guidelines for our CEO from 6x to 10x and for all other Executive Council members from 3x to 4x, as described further below in the section titled “Compensation Policies and Governance – Executive Stock Ownership.”2024 Annual Cash Incentive Bonus
| • | Removed strategic goals from the plan and increased the weight for the adjusted EBITDA metric from 50% to 75%. |
| • | Retained the +/- 10% ROIC modifier for continued focus on returns. |
Features of the 2024 PSU Awards
| • | Retained the weightings of the average ROIC metric at 50% and the cumulative adjusted EPS metric at 50%. |
| • | Updated the +/- 15% ESG modifier with a two-goal +/- 10% Strive 35 metric: (1) completion of projects related to water use and reclamation, and (2) absolute reduction in greenhouse gas emissions over the three-year performance period. |
| 52 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Peer Group |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Peer Group
The Compensation and Succession Committee utilizes the S&P 100 Index as a peer group to evaluate whether executive officer pay levels are aligned with performance on a relative basis and to assess relative total stockholder return for the PSUs granted prior to 2021.basis. We believe the large peer group is relevant for ADM because we compete for talent and investments across a wide range of industries. Moreover, our diverse business encompasses aspects of several industries; we do not have a direct competitor — competitor—in terms of size, focus or business mix — mix—in the public markets. As a result, the Compensation and Succession Committee believes it is appropriate to consider a broad spectrum of compensation levels and investment returns to arrive at our NEO compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American International Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Bank of America Corporation |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. |
Best Buy Co., Inc. |
|
|
Bunge Global SA |
Cardinal Health, Inc. |
|
|
Centene Corporation |
Charter Communications, Inc. |
Chevron Corporation |
Chubb Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deere & Company |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
Dollar General Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exxon Mobil Corporation |
FedEx Corporation |
Ford Motor Company |
General Dynamics Corporation |
General Electric Company |
General Motors Company |
HCA Healthcare, Inc. |
Honeywell International Inc. |
HP Inc. |
Humana Inc. |
Intel Corporation |
International Business Machines Corporation |
Johnson & Johnson |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
Lockheed Martin Corporation |
Lowe’s Companies, Inc. |
LyondellBasell Industries N.V. |
Marathon Petroleum Corporation |
McKesson Corporation |
Merck & Co., Inc. |
Meta Platforms, Inc. |
MetLife, Inc. |
|
|
Morgan Stanley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prudential Financial, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
The Home Depot, Inc. |
The Kroger Co. |
The Procter & Gamble Company |
The Progressive Corporation |
The TJX Companies, Inc. |
The Travelers Companies, Inc. |
The Walt Disney Company |
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. |
T-Mobile US, Inc. |
Tyson Foods, Inc. |
Uber Technologies, Inc. |
United Airlines Holdings, Inc. |
United Parcel Service, Inc. |
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated |
Valero Energy Corporation |
Verizon Communications Inc. |
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. |
|
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. |
Wells Fargo & Company |
| ADM Proxy Statement |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Benefits |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Benefits
Benefits
In addition to the direct elements of pay described above, ADM offers benefits to our NEOs to provide for basic health, welfare, and income security needs and to ensure that our compensation packages are competitive. With few exceptions, such as supplemental benefits provided to employees whose benefits under broad-based plans are limited under applicable tax laws, our policy is to offer the same benefits to all U.S. salaried employees as are offered to the NEOs.
| Eligibility | Description | ||
401(k) and ESOP | All salaried employees |
Qualified defined contribution plan where employees may defer up to 75% of eligible pay, or up to 2023. | ||
ADM Retirement Plan | All salaried employees |
| ||
Deferred Compensation Plan | Employees with salaries above $175,000 |
Eligible participants may defer up to 75% of their annual base salary and up to 100% of their annual cash incentive until designated future dates. Earning credits are added to the deferred compensation account balances based upon hypothetical investment elections available under these plans and chosen by the participant. These hypothetical investment options correspond with the investment options (other than | ||
Supplemental Retirement Plan | Employees whose retirement benefit is limited by applicable IRS limits |
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan that ensures participants in the Retirement Plan receive the same retirement benefit they would have received if not for certain limitations under applicable tax law. | ||
Healthcare and Other Benefits.NEOs receive the same healthcare benefits as other employees, except that we provide executive physicals and related services to our senior executives who serve on the Executive Council. We provide a benefits package for employees (including NEOs) and their eligible dependents, portions of which may be paid for by the employee. Benefits include life, accidental death and dismemberment, health (including prescription drug), dental, vision, and disability insurance; dependent and healthcare reimbursement accounts; tuition reimbursement; paid time off; holidays; and a matching gifts program for charitable contributions.
Perquisites.Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, we limit executive perquisites. Any NEO who receives a perquisite is individually responsible for any associated taxes.
The Compensation and Succession Committee allows our ChairmanBoard Chair and CEO to have access to Company charteredcompany-chartered aircraft for personal use for security and efficiency reasons. In addition, in 2023, after review of market practice, the Compensation and Succession Committee approved financial planning services through Fidelity to be provided to each NEO.
See the notes to the Summary Compensation Table for a description of other perquisites provided to the NEOs.
| 54 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Compensation Policies and Governance |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Policies and Governance
Compensation Policies and Governance
EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP
The Board of Directors believes it is important for each member of senior management to maintain a significant ownership position in shares of ADM’s common stock to further align their interests with the interests of our stockholders. Accordingly, we require each member of senior management to own shares of common stock with a value at least equal to a specified multiple of his or her annual base salary. In February 2022, the Compensation and Succession Committee increased the stock ownership guidelines for our CEO from 6x to 10x and for all other Executive Council members from 3x to 4x. Shares that count toward the ownership levels include shares owned outright, shares owned by immediate family members or a related trust if previously owned by the executive, shares held through the 401(k) plan, and unvested time-based RSUs. Stock options, whether exercisable or not, and unvested PSUs do not count toward determining whether the ownership level is met. Executives may not sell any companyCompany securities until the applicable guideline is met. As shown below, each of our NEOs who is a current employee exceeds the applicable ownership guideline by a significant margin.
Executive | Ownership Guideline
| Actual Ownership as of | ||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 10.0x | |||||||||
| 4.0x | |||||||||
| 4.0x | |||||||||
G. A. Morris | 4.0x | |||||||||
| 4.0x | |||||||||
TIMING OF GRANTS
The Compensation and Succession Committee approves all annual equity awards to NEOs at a meeting during the first quarter of each fiscal year, and awards are issued promptly thereafter. There is no attempt to time these grants in relation to the release of material, non-public information. Under the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, fair market value is the closing market price of ADM’s common stock on the last trading day prior to the date of grant. In addition to annual awards, NEOs may receive awards when they join the companyCompany or change their job status, including promotions.
CLAWBACK POLICY AND PROVISIONS
In 2023, our Board of Directors adopted a new Compensation Recovery Policy (the “Clawback Policy”) in accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Clawback Policy applies to all incentive-based compensation, which is any compensation that is granted, earned, or vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a financial reporting measure, received by our covered current and former executive officers, including our NEOs, during the applicable lookback period beginning October 2, 2023.
The Clawback Policy applies in the case of an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, including any required accounting restatement to correct an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements, or that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. The Clawback Policy provides that promptly following such an accounting restatement, the Compensation and Succession Committee will determine the amount of the erroneously awarded compensation, which is the excess of the amount of incentive-based compensation received by current and former executive officers during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the required restatement date over the amount of incentive-based compensation that otherwise would have been received had it been determined based on the restated amounts. The Company will provide each such executive officer with a written notice of such amount and a demand for repayment or return. If such repayment or return is not made within a reasonable time, the Clawback Policy provides that the Company will recover the erroneously awarded compensation in a reasonable and prompt manner using any lawful method, subject to limited exceptions as permitted by New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
We also include forfeiture and clawback provisions in the company’sCompany’s long-term incentive award agreements that provide us with the ability to recover this compensation for a broad range of reasons. Specifically, this policy providesthe agreements provide for the recoupment or forfeiture of any cash or equity incentive awards made to NEOs and certain other members of senior management if the individual is terminated for cause (which includes engaging in a periodbroad range of three years fromprohibited conduct), and, beginning with awards granted in 2024, if the vesting dateindividual engages in the event of a financial restatementany such prohibited conduct, even if his or ethical misconduct.her employment is not terminated. In addition, our equity awardsaward agreements incorporate post-vesting non-competition, non-solicitation and non-solicitationconfidentiality restrictions. Any violation of these provisions could be cause for the companyawards to be forfeited or the Company to initiate a clawback proceeding.proceeding post-vesting. Our aggressive approach to recoupment of long-term incentive compensation reflects the company’sCompany’s commitment to protecting stockholder value.
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 55 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits |
PROHIBITION ON INSIDER TRADING AND HEDGING
Pursuant to ADM’s Insider Trading Policy, employees and directors may not engage in short selling, speculative trading, or hedging transactions involving the company’sCompany’s stock including(including writing or trading in options, warrants, puts and calls, prepaid variable forward contracts, or equity swaps or collars;collars), or enter into other transactions that are designed to hedge or offset decreases in the price of the company’sCompany’s securities. In addition, directors and those officers and employees who have been notified by the LawCompany’s Legal Department that they are subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act are prohibited from pledging companyCompany securities as collateral, and any other employee wishing to enter into such an arrangement must first consult with, and comply with the directions of, the LawLegal Department.
Our Insider Trading Policy also provides that all transactions in ADM securities by directors, NEOs, and certain other officers and employees must be pre-cleared by the LawCompany’s Legal Department.
SECTION 162(M) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE EFFECTS ON THE COMPANY
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code precludes the companyCompany from taking a federal income tax deduction for compensation paid in excess of $1 million to our “covered employees” as defined under Section 162(m).
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits
Although a previous exception to this limit for “performance-based” compensation has since been eliminated, the Compensation and Succession Committee continues to believe that a significant portion of our executives’ compensation should be tied to the company’sCompany’s performance and that stockholder interests are best served if its discretion and flexibility in structuring and awarding compensation is not restricted. The Compensation and Succession Committee also believes that the amount of any expected loss of a tax deduction under Section 162(m) will be insignificant to the company’sCompany’s overall tax position. Therefore, the changes to Section 162(m) have not significantly impacted the design of our executive compensation program.
EVALUATION OF RISK IN OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
On an ongoing basis, the Compensation and Succession Committee, with input from management, assesses potential risks associated with compensation decisions and discusses them with our boardBoard of directorsDirectors if warranted. To date, we have not identified any incentive compensation features that encourage inappropriate risk-taking. To ensure we are considering all possibilities objectively, we engage an outside consultant every other year to review the company’sCompany’s programs and independently assess the risk in them.
In 2021,2023, the companyCompany engaged an outside consultant, The Korn Ferry Hay Group (KFHG),Meridian to assist the Compensation and Succession Committee in evaluating the risk in our compensation programs. As part of its independent assessment, KFHGMeridian reviewed all of the
company’s Company’s incentive compensation programs and determined that none encouragesencourage inappropriate risk-taking or the manipulation of earnings. The detailed findings of this review were discussed with management and presented to the Compensation and Succession Committee in November 2021.2023.
Another independent review of the company’s incentive programs will be conducted during 2023 and reported to the Compensation and Succession Committee.
LIABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH RETIREMENT PROGRAMS
The Compensation and Succession Committee is mindful that our non-qualified deferred compensation and supplemental retirement plans create financial statement liabilities. We generally do not set amounts aside in a “rabbi” trust for the benefit of participants in these plans. However, the deferred compensation plans have “rabbi” trust funding triggers in the event of a change in control of the company. These triggers provide some measure of assurance to employees that amounts they have chosen to defer from their current compensation will be held for their benefit, although still subject to creditor claims as required under the applicable tax law.
The company is required to fund its qualified pension plans in a manner consistent with the minimum funding requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Historically, the company has made contributions in excess of the minimum to maintain plans at or near a full funding level relative to the accrued benefit obligation.
Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits
NO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS
None of our NEOs has an employment contract or separation agreement. Consistent with our approach of rewarding performance, employment is not guaranteed, and either ADM or any NEO may terminate the employment relationship at any time.
ADM maintains a severance program that serves as a guideline for severance benefits that may be provided to various levels of employees, including the NEOs, upon termination of their employment without cause, but the program does not give anyone a contractual right to receive any severance benefits. The Compensation and Succession Committee generally requires a terminated employee to enter into a non-competition and/or non-solicitation agreement in exchange for receiving severance.
| 56 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS — Compensation and Succession Committee Report |
CHANGE IN CONTROL PROVISIONS
Upon a change in control of the company,Company, NEOs may receive certain protections related to their LTI awards (as described below), and other compensation detailed in the sections titled “Pension Benefits,” “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” and “Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements.” NEOs are not eligible to receive any other cash severance, continued health and welfare benefits, tax gross ups, or other change in control benefits.
Our incentive compensation plans provide non-employee directors and all employees, including executive officers, certain change in control protections for their LTI awards. For awards granted in 2017 and later, ifIf a change in control occurs with respect to the company,Company and equity awards are not assumed or replaced, the RSUs held by executive officers generally will vest immediately, and the number of PSUs that will vest immediately will be equal to the greater of the target number of PSUs and the number of PSUs earned based on a modified pro rata basis, ifactual performance during the equity award is not assumed or replaced.truncated performance period. The same accelerated vesting provisions will
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Employment Agreements, Severance, and Change in Control Benefits
apply if an award is assumed or replaced, but the executive officer’s employment is terminated for reasons other than for cause or good reason within 24 months of the change in control (referred to as “double-trigger” vesting). We adopted double-trigger accelerated vesting to provide our executives with some assurance that they will not be disadvantaged with respect to their equity awards in the event
of a change in control of the company.Company. This assurance increases the value of these awards to the executives (which in turn enhances retention) and makes it easier for our executives to focus on the potential benefits of a change in control for our stockholders without conflicting concerns about their own financial situations.
COMPENSATION AND SUCCESSION COMMITTEE REPORTCompensation and Succession Committee Report
The Compensation and Succession Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation and Succession Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
K. R. Westbrook, Chair
M. S. BurkeT. Colbert
S. F. HarrisonJ. C. Collins
L. Z. Schlitz
COMPENSATION AND SUCCESSION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Compensation and Succession Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of the Compensation and Succession Committee is or has been an employee of the companyCompany or any of the company’sCompany’s subsidiaries. There are no interlocking relationships between the companyCompany and other entities that might affect the determination of the compensation of the company’sCompany’s executive officers.
| ADM Proxy Statement |
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation for the fiscal years noted in the table of our named executive officers.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Option Awards ($)(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(4) | All Other Compensation ($)(5) | Total ($) | |||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO Chairman, CEO and | 2021 | 1,400,004 | — | 15,939,571 | — | 5,320,000 | 59,843 | 789,423 | 23,508,841 | |||||||||
| 2020 | 1,400,004 | — | 15,940,148 | — | 4,507,300 | 112,853 | 789,323 | 22,749,628 | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 1,383,338 | — | 13,641,916 | — | 2,898,000 | 93,298 | 757,710 | 18,774,263 | ||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG Vice Chairman and CFO | 2021 | 850,008 | — | 4,781,915 | — | 2,137,500 | 35,050 | 290,501 | 8,094,974 | |||||||||
| 2020 | 850,008 | — | 5,844,739 | — | 1,754,719 | 74,554 | 289,174 | 8,813,194 | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 845,848 | 4,722,182 | — | 1,164,375 | 61,783 | 247,521 | 7,041,709 | |||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI Senior Vice President, | 2021 2020 | 695,840 675,000 | — — | 3,187,979 4,250,761 | — — | 1,295,000 1,086,581 | 24,191 43,181 | 206,514 250,554 | 5,409,524 6,306,077 | |||||||||
President, Nutrition, and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer | 2019 | 669,168 | — | 2,938,269 | — | 664,875 | 29,335 | 146,870 | 4,448,517 | |||||||||
G. A. MORRIS Senior Vice President and President, Ag Services and Oilseeds | 2021 | 695,840 | — | 3,187,979 | — | 1,330,000 | — | 203,404 | 5,417,223 | |||||||||
| 2020 | 675,000 | — | 4,250,761 | — | 1,086,581 | 730,151 | 200,153 | 6,942,646 | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 670,834 | — | 2,938,269 | — | 664,875 | 818,206 | 161,865 | 5,254,049 | ||||||||||
J. D. TAETS Senior Vice President and President, Asia Pacific | 2021 | 700,008 | — | 2,975,476 | — | 1,295,000 | — | 420,610 | 5,391,094 | |||||||||
| 2020 | 700,008 | — | 3,878,766 | — | 1,091,825 | 746,347 | 198,279 | 6,615,225 | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 700,008 | — | 2,938,269 | — | 794,500 | 857,911 | 171,029 | 5,461,717 |
(1) Stock awards in 2021 consisted of RSU awards and PSU awards. The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards for fiscal years 2021, 2020, and 2019 and of the target level of the PSU awards for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019. We calculated these amounts in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 utilizing the assumptions discussed in Note 11 to our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019. The grant date fair value of the 2021 RSUs and the grant date fair value of the 2021 PSUs if target performance and maximum performance is achieved are as follows:
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($)(1) | Stock ($)(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)(4) | All Other ($)(5) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO Board Chair, CEO and | 2023 | 1,482,918 | — | 17,919,686 | 3,609,611 | 117,551 | 1,284,902 | 24,414,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 1,429,174 | — | 17,727,259 | 4,712,540 | — | 880,205 | 24,749,178 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 1,400,004 | — | 15,939,571 | 5,320,000 | 59,843 | 789,423 | 23,508,841 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR(6) Senior Vice President | 2023 | 770,840 | — | 3,492,888 | — | 93,909 | 158,604 | 4,516,241 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 704,798 | — | 2,411,505 | 1,231,500 | — | 90,624 | 4,438,428 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES(7) Senior Vice President, | 2023 | 236,091 | 630,000 | 5,620,122 | 292,237 | 7,047 | 248,340 | 7,033,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS Senior Vice President | 2023 | 714,000 | — | 3,239,765 | 863,405 | 214,426 | 241,841 | 5,273,437 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 711,668 | — | 3,223,194 | 1,172,388 | — | 204,083 | 5,311,334 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 695,840 | — | 3,187,979 | 1,330,000 | — | 203,404 | 5,417,223 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY(8) Senior Vice President | 2023 | 660,834 | — | 3,138,499 | 801,733 | 171,259 | 237,598 | 5,009,923 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 650,004 | — | 3,223,194 | 1,067,300 | — | 177,288 | 5,117,787 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI(9) Former Senior Vice President, Chief Sales and Marketing | 2023 | 714,000 | — | 3,239,765 | 684,905 | 51,734 | 218,435 | 4,908,839 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 711,668 | — | 5,245,225 | 1,100,988 | — | 196,351 | 7,254,232 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 695,840 | — | 3,187,979 | 1,295,000 | 24,191 | 206,514 | 5,409,524 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PSUs | ||||||
Name | RSUs | Target | Maximum | |||
J. R. Luciano | $7,969,785 | $7,969,785 | $15,939,571 | |||
R. G. Young | $2,390,957 | $2,390,957 | $4,781,915 | |||
V. F. Macciocchi | $1,593,990 | $1,593,990 | $3,187,979 | |||
G. A. Morris | $1,593,990 | $1,593,990 | $3,187,979 | |||
J. D. Taets | $1,487,738 | $1,487,738 | $2,975,477 | |||
| (1) | The amount reported in this column represents a one-time sign-on bonus for Ms. Jones, intended to replace the prorated 2023 annual cash incentive that she forfeited from her prior employer to join the Company, which amount was paid in early 2024. |
(2) No options were issued in 2019, 2020 or
| (2) | Stock awards in 2023 consisted of RSU awards and PSU awards. The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSU awards for fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021 and of the target level of the PSU awards for fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021. We calculated these amounts in accordance with the provisions of |
| 58 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Summary Compensation Table |
(3) The amounts reported in this column represent amounts earned under our annual incentive plan during each of the respective fiscal periods shown. In each case, the amounts were paid shortly after the close of the applicable fiscal period.
(4) The amounts reported in this column for 2021 represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of each named executive officer’s (NEO’s) accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021, using the same assumptions used for financial reporting purposes except that retirement age is assumed to be the normal retirement age (65) specified in the plans. For 2021, Messrs. Morris and Taets’ aggregate change in actuarial present value was negative, and therefore in accordance with SEC rules, the value shown in the table is zero. The aggregate change in actuarial present value was negative $8,539 for Mr. Morris and negative $111,753 for Mr. Taets. No NEO received above market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. To derive the change in pension value for financial reporting purposes, the assumptions used to value pension liabilities on December 31, 2021 were an interest rate of 3.15% for the ADM Retirement Plan, an interest rate of 2.82% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, and mortality was determined using the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using Scale MP-2021. The assumptions used to value pension liabilities on December 31, 2020 were an interest rate of 2.84% for the ADM Retirement Plan, an interest rate of 2.47% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, and mortality was determined using the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using Scale MP-2020.
(5) The amounts reported in this column for 2021 include costs for use of company-leased aircraft, relocation expenses, value of company-provided life insurance, imputed value of company-provided life insurance, costs for executive healthcare services, dividend equivalents paid on unvested RSUs, company contributions under the 401(k) and ESOP, charitable gifts
| FASB ASC Topic 718 utilizing the assumptions discussed in Note 11 to our financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. The grant date fair value of the 2023 RSUs and the grant date fair value of the 2023 PSUs if target performance and maximum performance is achieved are as follows: |
| PSUs | |||||||||||||||
Name | RSUs | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | $ | 7,167,907 | $ | 10,751,779 | $ | 21,503,558 | |||||||||
V. Luthar | $ | 1,397,155 | $ | 2,095,733 | $ | 4,191,466 | |||||||||
R. B. Jones | $ | 4,240,116 | $ | 1,380,006 | $ | 2,760,012 | |||||||||
G. A. Morris | $ | 1,295,890 | $ | 1,943,875 | $ | 3,887,750 | |||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | $ | 1,255,416 | $ | 1,883,083 | $ | 3,766,166 | |||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | $ | 1,295,890 | $ | 1,943,875 | $ | 3,887,750 | |||||||||
| (3) | ||
The amounts reported in this column represent amounts earned under our annual incentive plan during each of the respective fiscal periods shown. In each case, the amounts were paid after the close of the applicable fiscal period. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, |
Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2021
pursuant to the company’s matching charitable gift program which is available to substantially all full-time employees and non-employee directors and, for Mr. Taets, expenses related to certain expatriate tax services and tax gross ups related thereto. Specific perquisites and other items applicable to each NEO listed are identified below by an “X”. Where a perquisite or benefit exceeded $10,000 for an individual, the dollar amount is given. Amounts reported in this column for 2020 and 2019 have been updated to include the dividend equivalent amounts paid on unvested RSUs in each of those years.
| (4) | The amounts reported in this column for 2023 represent the aggregate change in actuarial present value of each named executive officer’s accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial pension plans from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2023, using the same assumptions used for financial reporting purposes except that retirement age is assumed to be the normal retirement age (65) specified in the plans. No NEO received above market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. To derive the change in pension value for financial reporting purposes, the assumptions used to value pension liabilities on December 31, 2023 were an interest rate of 4.96% for the ADM Retirement Plan, an interest rate of 4.84% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, and mortality was determined using the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using Scale MP-2021. The assumptions used to value pension liabilities on December 31, 2022 were an interest rate of 5.14% for the ADM Retirement Plan, an interest rate of 5.02% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, and mortality was determined using the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using Scale MP-2021. |
Name | Personal Aircraft Use | Relocation Expenses | Expatriate Tax & Gross-Up Expenses | Imputed Income | Health | Executive Services | Dividend Equivalents Paid on Unvested RSUs | Matching Charitable Gifts | 401(k) Company Contributions | |||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 29,113 | X | 12,869 | X | 718,567 | X | $14,500 | |||||||||||
R. G. Young | X | 18,857 | X | 246,055 | X | $14,500 | ||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | X | 18,833 | X | 165,606 | X | $14,500 | ||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | X | 19,133 | X | 166,546 | X | $14,500 | ||||||||||||
J. D. Taets | 26,399 | 205,554 | X | 10,303 | X | 158,345 | X | $14,500 | ||||||||||
| (5) | The amounts reported in this column for 2023 include costs for use of company-leased aircraft and spousal travel, relocation stipend, value of company-provided life insurance, imputed value of company-provided life insurance, the value of health insurance company-paid premiums, costs for executive healthcare services, dividend equivalents paid on unvested RSUs, accrued dividends for unvested 2023 PSUs (dividends were credited starting with the 2023 PSUs), company contributions under the 401(k) and ESOP, and charitable gifts pursuant to the Company’s matching charitable gift program. In 2023, we began making personal financial planning services available to our executive officers, but because such services are provided by the provider of other services to the Company, and such provider does not charge any additional amounts for the individual financial planning services to our executive officers, there is no incremental cost to the Company for such services. Specific perquisites and other items applicable to each NEO listed are identified below by an “X”. Where a perquisite exceeded $10,000 for an individual, the dollar amount is given. |
Name | Personal Aircraft Use and Spousal Travel ($) | Relocation Stipend ($) | Imputed Income | Health Insurance Company Paid Premiums & Company- Provided Life Insurance ($) | Executive Healthcare Services | Dividend Equivalents Paid on Unvested RSUs and Accrued on Unvested 2023 PSUs ($) | Matching Charitable Gifts | 401(k) Company Contributions ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 340,716 | — | X | 15,714 | X | 902,498 | X | 16,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | — | — | X | 21,595 | X | 114,847 | X | 16,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones | — | 200,000 | X | X | — | 32,062 | — | 8,633 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | — | — | X | 21,510 | X | 175,149 | 25,000 | 16,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | — | — | X | 13,801 | X | 167,672 | 36,116 | 16,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | — | — | X | 21,510 | X | 175,149 | — | 16,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate incremental cost to our companyCompany of perquisites and personal benefits is determined as follows. In the case of payment of expenses related to items such as executive healthcare services, and relocation expenses, incremental cost is determined by the amounts paid to third-party providers. In the case of personal use of company-leased aircraft, incremental cost is based solely on variable costs under the agreements with the lessor of the aircraft, and does not include fixed or other costs.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS DURING FISCAL YEAR 2021
| (6) | Mr. Luthar was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on April 7, 2022. As permitted by SEC rules, because 2022 was Mr. Luthar’s first year as an NEO, the compensation paid to him prior to 2022 is not included in this table. |
| (7) | Ms. Jones joined the Company as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary on September 5, 2023. |
| (8) | Mr. Cuddy was not an NEO in 2021. |
| (9) | Mr. Macciocchi was no longer an executive officer of the Company as of November 13, 2023, but remained employed by the Company in a transition support role until his retirement from the Company on December 31, 2023. |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 59 |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2023 |
Grants of Plan-based Awards During Fiscal Year 2023
The following table summarizes the grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.2023.
Estimated Future Payouts Under |
Estimated Future Payouts Under |
All Other Stock or | Grant Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Date of Committee Action | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award | 0 | 2,800,000 | 5,600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 0 | 146,342 | 292,684 | 7,969,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 146,342 | 7,969,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award | 0 | 1,125,000 | 2,250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 0 | 43,903 | 87,806 | 2,390,957 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 43,903 | 2,390,957 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award | 0 | 700,000 | 1,400,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 0 | 29,269 | 58,538 | 1,593,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 29,269 | 1,593,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award | 0 | 700,000 | 1,400,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 0 | 29,269 | 58,538 | 1,593,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 29,269 | 1,593,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award | 0 | 700,000 | 1,400,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 0 | 27,318 | 54,636 | 1,487,738 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/11/21 | 2/3/21 | 27,318 | 1,487,738 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The grant date fair value is generally the amount the company would expense in its financial statements over the award’s service period under FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to the PSUs the value represents the probable outcome of the performance condition using target payout levels. See Footnote 1 to the Summary Compensation Table for additional detail.
| Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Shares of | Grant Date Option | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Date of Committee Action | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
|
|
|
|
|
| 746,250 | 2,985,000 | 5,970,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | 131,762 | 263,524 |
|
|
| 10,751,779 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 87,842 | 7,167,907 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
|
|
|
|
|
| 193,750 | 775,000 | 1,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | 25,683 | 51,366 |
|
|
| 2,095,733 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17,122 | 1,397,155 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
|
|
|
|
|
| 60,417 | 241,668 | 483,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 09/05/23 | 8/09/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | 17,495 | 34,990 |
|
|
| 1,380,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 09/05/23 | 8/09/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 53,754 | 4,240,116 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
|
|
|
|
|
| 178,500 | 714,000 | 1,428,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | 23,822 | 47,644 |
|
|
| 1,943,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,881 | 1,295,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
|
|
|
|
|
| 165,750 | 663,000 | 1,326,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | 23,077 | 46,154 |
|
|
| 1,883,083 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,385 | 1,255,416 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Plan Award |
|
|
|
|
|
| 178,500 | 714,000 | 1,428,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Share Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — | 23,822 | 47,644 |
|
|
| 1,943,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Unit Award | 2/09/23 | 1/25/23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,881 | 1,295,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | The grant date fair value is generally the amount the Company would expense in its financial statements over the award’s service period under FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to the PSUs, the value represents the probable outcome of the performance condition using target payout levels. See footnote (2) to the Summary Compensation Table for additional detail. |
| 60 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Grants of Plan-based Awards During Fiscal Year 2023 |
Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During Fiscal Year 2021
All of the equity awards in the table above were granted under our 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan. The awards shown in the columns designated “Estimated FuturePossible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” were made pursuant to our annual cash incentive plan. The amounts actually paid with respect to these awards are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2021Analysis—2023 Executive Compensation Decisions — 2021Decisions—2023 Annual Cash Incentives” for more information about our annual cash incentive plan.
The PSU awards shown in the column designated “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” in the table above are PSU awards and vest in three years if the companyCompany achieves certain performance goals over a three-year performance period (2021 – 2023)(2023—2025). The 20212023 PSU metrics are: (i) the degree to which the companyCompany achieves specified average Adjustedadjusted ROIC goals over the 2021 – 20232023—2025 performance period (50% weighting), and (ii) the degree to which the company’s Nutrition segmentCompany achieves cumulative adjusted operating profit compound annual growth rate goalsEPS over the 2021 – 20232023—2025 performance period (50% weighting). The number of 20212023 PSUs that may be earned following the application of such performance goals against actual performance will be subject to a relative TSRtwo-goal ESG modifier of up to +/- 10%+/-15%. See “Compensation Discussion During the performance period, dividend equivalents will be accrued and Analysis — 2021 Executive Compensation Decisions — Equity-Based Long-Term Incentives” for more information aboutsettled in cash at the 2021 PSUs.end of the three-year performance period on the basis of number of PSUs actually earned. Dividend equivalents on PSUs are paid at the same rate as dividends to our stockholders generally.
All of the awards shown in the “All Other Stock Awards” column in the table above are RSUs awards and vest in fullthirds on each of the first three years afteranniversaries of the date of grant, other than 42,090 of the RSUs for Ms. Jones, which vest 50% on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant. Under the terms of the RSU award agreements, the recipient of the award may receive cash dividend equivalents on RSUs prior to their vesting date, but may not transfer or pledge the units in any manner prior to vesting. Dividend equivalents on RSUs are paid at the same rate as dividends to our stockholders generally.
The 20212023 RSU and PSU awards are subject to double-trigger accelerated vesting and payout upon a change in control only if the award recipient’s employment is terminated without cause or if the award recipient resigns for good reason, in each case, within 24 months after the change in control, or if the surviving entity in the change in control transaction refuses to continue, assume, or replace the awards. In such instance the 20212023 RSU awards will vest in full immediately, and the number of 20212023 PSU awards that vest will be equal to the greater of the target number of PSUs and the number of PSUs earned based on actual performance during the truncated performance period. Upon the death of an award recipient, vesting of the RSU awards will accelerate in full, and the PSU awards will vest at target. If an award recipient’s employment ends as a result of disability, orthe RSU and PSU awards will continue to vest in accordance with the original vesting schedule. If an award recipient’s employment ends as a result of retirement, both the RSU and PSU awards will continue to vest in accordance with the original vesting schedule. If an award recipient’s employment ends for any other reason, unvested RSU and PSU awards will be forfeited. With respect to each of the RSU and PSU awards described above, if an award recipient’s employment is terminated for cause, or if the recipient breaches a non-competition, non-solicitation or confidentiality restriction, or participates in an activity deemed by us to be detrimental to our company, the recipient’s unvested units will be forfeited, and any shares issued in settlement of units that have already vested must be returned to us or the recipient must pay us the amount of the shares’ fair market value as of the date they were issued.
The impact of a termination of employment or change in control of our companyCompany on RSU, PSU and PSUPRSU awards held by our named executive officers is quantified in the “Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements” section below.
| ADM Proxy Statement |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2023 Year-End |
Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2021 2023 Year-End
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR 2021 YEAR-END
The following table summarizes information regarding unexercised stock options, unvested RSUs, and unvested restricted stock awardsunearned PSUs and PRSUs for the named executive officers as of December 31, 2021.2023.
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(1) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($)(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | 2-11-2016 | 931,099 | — | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-12-2015 | 324,821 | — | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-13-2014 | 234,531 | — | 40.65 | 2-13-2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-21-2013 | 51,664 | — | 32.50 | 2-21-2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8-16-2012 | 216,585 | — | 26.25 | 8-16-2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 483,994 | 32,713,155 | 321,086 | 21,702,203 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG | 2-11-2016 | 346,908 | — | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-12-2015 | 214,836 | — | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-13-2014 | 184,631 | — | 40.65 | 2-13-2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-21-2013 | 31,503 | — | 32.50 | 2-21-2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8-16-2012 | 123,763 | — | 26.25 | 8-16-2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 164,367 | 11,109,566 | 107,976 | 7,298,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | 2-11-2016 | 93,110 | — | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | 110,956 | 7,499,516 | 75,868 | 5,127,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | 2-11-2016 | 89,793 | — | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-12-2015 | 28,046 | — | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 110,956 | 7,499,516 | 75,868 | 5,127,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS | 2-11-2016 | 115,126 | — | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-12-2015 | 75,743 | — | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-13-2014 | 70,285 | — | 40.65 | 2-13-2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 104,927 | 7,092,016 | 69,839 | 4,720,418 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Stock option awards vest at a rate of 20% of the subject shares per year on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date.
(2) The RSUs reported in this column vest on the dates and in the amounts set forth below.
| OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable(1) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) | Market Value Stock that | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) | Equity That Have Not | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | 2-11-2016 | 581,099 | — | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2-12-2015 | 324,821 | — | 46.92 | 2-12-2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 325,940 | 23,539,387 | 269,396 | 19,455,779 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | 2-11-2016 | 28,366 | — | 33.18 | 2-11-2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35,354 | 2,553,266 | 49,372 | 3,565,646 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
| 53,754 | 3,882,114 | 17,495 | 1,263,489 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G.A. MORRIS | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
| 61,833 | 4,465,579 | 48,847 | 3,527,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
| 61,337 | 4,429,758 | 48,102 | 3,473,926 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|
| 61,833 | 4,465,579 | 75,012 | 5,417,367 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted Stock Units Vesting On: | |||||||||||||||
Name | 2/14/22 | 2/13/23 | 2/11/24 | ||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 162,908 | 174,744 | 146,342 | ||||||||||||
R. G. Young | 56,391 | 64,073 | 43,903 | ||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | 35,088 | 46,599 | 29,269 | ||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | 35,088 | 46,599 | 29,269 | ||||||||||||
J. D. Taets | 35,088 | 42,521 | 27,318 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Stock option awards vest at a rate of 20% of the subject shares per year on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date. |
(3) Based on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2021, which was $67.59.
| (2) | The RSUs reported in this column vest on the dates and in the amounts set forth below. |
| Restricted Stock Units Vesting On: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | 2/9/24 | 2/11/24 | 9/5/24 | 2/9/25 | 2/10/25 | 4/11/25 | 9/5/25 | 2/9/26 | 9/5/26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 29,867 | 146,342 | — | 28,988 | 91,756 | — | — | 28,987 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | 5,822 | 7,318 | — | 5,650 | 4,171 | 6,743 | — | 5,650 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones | — | — | 25,011 | — | — | — | 24,894 | — | 3,849 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | 5,400 | 29,269 | — | 5,241 | 16,683 | — | — | 5,240 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | 5,231 | 29,269 | — | 5,077 | 16,683 | — | — | 5,077 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | 5,400 | 29,269 | — | 5,241 | 16,683 | — | — | 5,240 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 62 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2023 |
(4) The PSUs reported in this column represent 2020 PSU and 2021 PSU awards that each will vest at the end of the three-year performance period. The number of PSUs that the executive officer will receive is dependent upon the achievement of certain financial metrics approved by the Compensation and Succession Committee measuring, in the case of the 2020 PSUs, Adjusted ROIC, Nutrition segment adjusted operating profit growth and a relative TSR modifier, and in the case of the 2021 PSUs, Adjusted ROIC, Nutrition segment adjusted operating profit compound annual growth and a relative TSR modifier. The amount of PSU units shown is the target number of units that could be earned and paid out in shares.
| (3) | Based on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of 2023, which was $72.22. |
| (4) | The awards reported in this column represent 2022 PSU, 2022 PRSU and 2023 PSU awards that each will vest at the end of the three-year performance period. The number of PSUs that the executive officer will receive is dependent upon the achievement of certain financial metrics approved by the Compensation and Succession Committee measuring: in the case of the 2022 PSUs and the 2023 PSUs, Adjusted ROIC, Adjusted EPS and a two-goal ESG modifier; and in the case of the PRSUs, metrics related to the Company’s Nutrition segment. The amount of PSUs and PRSUs shown is the target number of units that could be earned and paid out in shares. |
Other than for Mr. Luthar, this table does not include the 2021 PSU awards that were earned for the 2021-2023 performance period, because those earned PSUs were not subject to an additional service-based vesting period and instead vested upon the Compensation and Succession Committee’s determination of the number of PSUs earned. The earned 2021 PSUs are reported in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2023” table. For Mr. Luthar, this table does include the number of 2021 PSUs at target, since as of the date of this Proxy Statement, |
The PSUs and PRSUs reported in this column have the following performance periods in the following amounts, and also include the 7,318 target number of 2021 PSUs for Mr. Luthar with a 1/1/21 to 12/31/23 performance period, which have not been determined to be earned or vested as described above. |
| Performance Share Units/PRSUs: | ||||||||||
Name | Performance Period 1/1/22 to 12/31/24 | Performance Period 1/1/23 to 12/31/25 | ||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 137,634 | 131,762 | ||||||||
V. Luthar | 16,371 | 25,683 | ||||||||
R. B. Jones | — | 17,495 | ||||||||
G. A. Morris | 25,025 | 23,822 | ||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | 25,025 | 23,077 | ||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | 51,190 | (a) | 23,822 | |||||||
Executive Compensation
| (a) | Of this amount, 26,165 represent PRSUs that Mr. Macciocchi forfeited upon his retirement from the Company on December 31, 2023. All other equity awards held by Mr. Macciocchi as of December 31, 2023 continue to vest in accordance with their original vesting schedule. |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 20212023
The company did not assign a threshold unit amount to the 2020 or 2021 PSU awards. This table does not include the 2019 PSU awards that were earned for the 2019-2021 performance period, because those earned PSUs were not subject to an additional service-based vesting period and instead vested upon the Compensation and Succession Committee’s determination of the number of PSUs earned. The earned 2019 PSUs are reported in the “—Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Fiscal Year 2021” table.
| Performance Stock Units: | ||||||||||
Name | Performance Period 1/1/20 to 12/31/22 | Performance Period 1/1/21 to 12/31/23 | ||||||||
J. R. Luciano | 174,744 | 146,342 | ||||||||
R. G. Young | 64,073 | 43,903 | ||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | 46,599 | 29,269 | ||||||||
G. A. Morris | 46,599 | 29,269 | ||||||||
J. D. Taets | 42,521 | 27,318 | ||||||||
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2021
The following table summarizes information regarding stock options exercised by the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20212023 and RSU and PSU awards to the named executive officers that vested during that same period.
| OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | |||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired On Vesting (#)(2) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(3) | ||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | — | — | 425,311 | 29,360,402 | ||||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG | — | — | 145,904 | 10,089,712 | ||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | — | — | 91,802 | 6,334,747 | ||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | — | — | 94,343 | 6,476,332 | ||||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS(4) | 43,711 | 996,508 | 94,343 | 6,476,332 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) Represents the difference between the market value of the shares acquired upon exercise (calculated using the sale price of the shares on the NYSE on the date preceding the exercise date) and the aggregate exercise price of the shares acquired.
(2) Reflects vesting of the 2018 RSUs during 2021, and the number of 2019 PSUs that were earned for the 2019-2021 performance period and vested upon the Compensation and Succession Committee’s determination of the number of PSUs earned.
(3) Represents the market value of the shares issued in settlement of 2018 RSU and 2019 PSU awards on the date the awards vested, calculated using the closing sale price reported on the NYSE on the trading date immediately prior to the vesting date, before shares were withheld for taxes.
(4) Mr. Taets exercised: (a) 24,539 options at a strike price of $33.18 on February 12, 2021; (b) 13,861 options at a strike price of $32.50 on February 12, 2021; and (c) 5,311 options at a strike price of $26.25 on February 12, 2021.
| OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired On Vesting (#)(2) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | — | — |
|
|
| 321,086 | 23,024,279 | ||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | — | — |
|
|
| 11,068 | 908,572 | ||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | — | — |
|
|
| — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | — | — |
|
|
| 75,868 | 5,561,256 | ||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | — | — |
|
|
| 64,218 | 4,604,907 | ||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | — | — |
|
|
| 75,868 | 5,561,256 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents the difference between the market value of the shares acquired upon exercise (calculated using the closing sale price of the shares on the NYSE on the date preceding the exercise date) and the aggregate exercise price of the shares acquired. |
| (2) | Reflects vesting of the 2020 RSUs during 2023, and the number of 2021 PSUs that were earned for the 2021-2023 performance period and vested upon the Compensation and Succession Committee’s determination of the number of PSUs earned. For Mr. Luthar, does not include any amounts related to his 2021 PSUs, since as of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation and Succession Committee had not made a determination related to his 2021 PSUs since he remained on administrative leave. |
| (3) | Represents the market value of the shares issued in settlement of 2020 RSU and 2021 PSU awards on the date the awards vested, calculated using the closing sale price reported on the NYSE on the trading date immediately prior to the vesting date, before shares were withheld for taxes. |
| ADM Proxy Statement |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Pension Benefits |
Executive Compensation
Pension Benefits
PENSION BENEFITSPension Benefits
The following table summarizes information regarding the participation of each of the named executive officers in our defined benefit retirement plans as of the pension plan measurement date for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.2023.
Name | Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#)(1) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(2) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#)(1) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(2) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | |||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | ADM Retirement Plan | 11 | 126,224 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 11 | 443,723 | 0 | J. R. LUCIANO | ADM Retirement Plan | 13 | 145,350 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 13 | 502,590 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG | ADM Retirement Plan | 11 | 130,814 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 11 | 268,691 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | ADM Retirement Plan | 19 | 285,033 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 19 | 235,270 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | ADM Retirement Plan | 1 | 7,047 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 1 | 0 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | ADM Retirement Plan | 29 | 799,176 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 29 | 1,321,435 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | ADM Retirement Planı | 26 | 639,375 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 26 | 949,162 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | ADM Retirement Plan | 10 | 70,096 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 10 | 98,941 | 0 | V. F. MACCIOCCHI | ADM Retirement Plan | 12 | 91,951 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 12 | 123,426 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | ADM Retirement Plan | 27 | 1,059,322 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 27 | 1,926,475 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS | ADM Retirement Plan | 34 | 1,508,646 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan | 34 | 2,849,696 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The number of years of credited service was calculated as of the pension plan measurement date used for financial statement reporting purposes, which was December 31, 2021. For each of the named executive officers, the number of years of credited service is equal to the number of actual years of service with our company.
| (1) | The number of years of credited service was calculated as of the pension plan measurement date used for financial statement reporting purposes, which was December 31, 2023. For each of the named executive officers, the number of years of credited service is equal to the number of actual years of service with our Company. |
(2) The assumptions used to value pension liabilities as of December 31, 2021 were an interest rate of 3.15%
| (2) | The assumptions used to value pension liabilities as of December 31, 2023 were an interest rate of 4.96% for the ADM Retirement Plan and 4.84% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan and mortality was determined under the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using scale MP-2021. Messrs. Luthar, Morris and Cuddy had previously participated in the final average pay formula under the ADM Retirement Plan and the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, while Messrs. Luciano and Macciocchi had always participated in the cash balance formula under those plans. Effective 1/1/2022, all participants now earn benefits under the cash balance formula in those plans, including Ms. Jones who joined the Company in 2023. The amounts reported for Mr. Luciano, Mr. Macciocchi and Ms. Jones are the present value of their respective projected normal retirement benefit under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans at December 31, 2023. The amounts reported are calculated by projecting the balance in the accounts forward to age 65 by applying a 4.94% interest rate, converting to a single-life annuity as of age 65, and then discounting back to December 31, 2023 using the assumptions specified above. The total account balance for Mr. Luciano at December 31, 2023 under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $647,940, the total account balance for Mr. Luthar under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $520,303, and the total account balance for Mr. Macciocchi at December 31, 2023 under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $215,377, which are the amounts that would have been distributable if such individuals had terminated employment on that date. |
Qualified Retirement Plan and 2.82% for the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan and mortality was determined under the PRI-2012 mortality table, with a white collar adjustment, projected generationally using scale MP-2021. Mr. Morris and Mr. Taets participate in the final average pay formula under the ADM Retirement Plan and the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan, while Mr. Luciano, Mr. Young and Mr. Macciocchi participate in the cash balance formula under those plans. The amounts reported for Mr. Luciano, Mr. Young and Mr. Macciocchi are the present value of their respective projected normal retirement benefit under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans at December 31, 2021. The amounts reported are calculated by projecting the balance in the accounts forward to age 65 by applying a 2.06% interest rate, converting to a single-life annuity as of age 65, and then discounting back to December 31, 2021 using the assumptions specified above. The total account balance for Mr. Luciano at December 31, 2021 under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $409,347.58, the total account balance for Mr. Young at December 31, 2021 under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $289,492.25 and the total account balance for Mr. Macciocchi at December 31, 2021 under the Retirement and Supplemental Plans was $127,516.51, which are the amounts that would have been distributable if such individuals had terminated employment on that date.
We sponsor the ADM Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”), which is a qualified defined benefit plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Retirement Plan covers eligible salaried employees of our companyCompany and its participating affiliates.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Retirement Plan was amended to provide benefits determined under a cash balance formula. The cash balance formula appliesinitially applied to any participant entering or re-entering the plan on or after January 1, 2009 and to any participant who had less than five years of service prior to January 1, 2009. For a participant with an accrued benefit and less than five years of service or more prior to January 1, 2009, an account was established on January 1, 2009 with an opening balance equal to the present value of his or her accrued benefit determined under the Retirement Plan’s prior final average pay formula. TheFrom January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2021, the accrued benefits of all other participants to whom the cash balance formula doesdid not apply continuecontinued to be determined under the traditional final average pay formula.
In December 2017, the Retirement Plan was amended to freeze the traditional final average pay formula benefit accruals as of December 31, 2021 for all active final average pay formula participants in the Retirement Plan on that date. Final average pay accrued benefits are calculated as if the participant terminated employment on the earlier of their actual termination date or December 31, 2021. The final average pay benefit was not converted to a cash balance benefit, but remains subject to the final average pay benefit rules. As of January 1, 2022, all Retirement Plan participants accrue future benefits under the cash balance formula, based on their age and total years of service.
| 64 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Qualified Retirement Plan |
Messrs. Luciano Young, and Macciocchi and Ms. Jones participate only in the cash balance formula, while Messrs. Luthar, Morris and TaetsCuddy participate in the cash balance formula and have a frozen final average pay formula.formula benefit as well.
A participant whose accrued benefit is determined underCash Balance Formula: Under the cash balance formula, a participant has an individual hypothetical account established
under the Retirement Plan. Pay and interest credits are madecredited on an annual basis to the participant’s account. Pay credits are equal to a percentage of the participant’s earnings for the year based on the sum of the participant’s age and years of service at the end of the year under the schedule to the right.below.
AGE + SERVICE | PAY | ||||||
Less than 40 | % | ||||||
at least 40 but less than 50 | % | ||||||
at least 50 but less than 60 | % | ||||||
at least 60 but less than 70 | % | ||||||
at least 70 but less than 80 | % | ||||||
80 or more | % | ||||||
Interest credits are made at the end of the year and are calculated on the balance of the participant’s account as of the first day of the plan year, using an interest rate based upon the yield on 30-year Treasury bonds, subject to a minimum annual interest rate of 1.95%. The participant’s pension benefit will be the amount of the balance in the participant’s account at the time that the pension becomes payable under the Retirement Plan. The pension payable to a participant
Executive Compensation
Supplemental Retirement Plan
whose accrued benefit under the final average pay formula was converted to the cash balance formula at January 1, 2009, if paid in annuity form, will be increased to reflect any additional benefit which the participant would have received in that form under the traditional formula, but only with respect to the benefit accrued by the participant prior to January 1, 2009. A participant under the cash balance formula becomes vested in a benefit under the Retirement Plan after three years of service. There are no special early retirement benefits under the cash balance formula.
Final Average Pay Formula: For any participant who accrued a participant whose accrued benefit is determined under the final average pay formula prior to January 1, 2022, the formula calculatescalculated a life annuity payable at a normal retirement age of 65 based upon a participant’s highest average earnings over 60 consecutive months during the last 15 years of employment.employment (or the last 15 years prior to December 31, 2021, for those employed on that date). The final average pay formula provides a benefit of 36.0% of a participant’s final average earnings, plus 16.5% of the participant’s final average earnings in excess of Social Security “covered compensation.” This benefit accrues ratably over 30 years of service. A participant accrues an additional benefit of 0.5% of final average earnings for years of service in excess of 30. Early retirement is available at age 55 with 10 years of service. Final average pay formula normal retirement age benefits were frozen as of the earlier of a participant’s termination of employment or December 31, 2021, and will not increase in the future. The life annuity payable at early retirement is subsidized relative to the normal retirement benefit. The payment amount in life annuity form is 97% of the full benefit amount at age 64, and 50% at age 55, with adjustments between those two ages. All participants underwith the final average pay formula benefit are vested in their final average pay formula benefits under the Retirement Plan, based on five years of service.
Earnings for purposes of the cash balance and the final average pay formulas generally include amounts reflected as pay on Form W-2, increased by 401(k) Plan pre-tax deferrals and elective “cafeteria plan” contributions, and decreased by bonuses, expense allowances/reimbursements, severance pay, income from stock option and restricted stock awards or cash payments in lieu thereof, merchandise or service discounts, amounts paid in a form other than cash, and other fringe benefits. Annual earnings are limited as required under Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code.
When a participant is eligible for a pension, the participant has a choice of a life annuity, a joint and 50% survivor annuity, a joint and 75% survivor annuity, or a joint and 100% survivor annuity. Each joint and survivor annuity form is the actuarial equivalent of the life annuity payable at the same age, with actuarial equivalence determined using
the IRS prescribed mortality table under Section 417(e) of the Internal Revenue Code and an interest rate assumption of 6%. CashIndividuals with a cash balance participantsformula benefit may also elect a lump-sum payment option.
In December 2017, the Retirement Plan was amended to freeze final average pay formula benefit accruals as of December 31, 2021 for all active final average pay formula participants in the Retirement Plan on that date. Final average pay accrued benefits would be calculated as if the participant terminated employment on the earlier of their actual termination date or December 31, 2021. The final average pay benefit will not be converted to a cash balance benefit, but will remain subject to the final average pay benefit rules. As of January 1, 2022, all Retirement Plan participants will accrue future benefits under the cash balance formula based on their age and total years of service.benefit a lump-sum payment.
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 65 |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Supplemental Retirement Plan |
Supplemental Retirement Plan
We also sponsor the ADM Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”), which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Supplemental Plan covers participants in the Retirement Plan whose benefit under such plan is limited by the benefit limits of Section 415 or the compensation limit of Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Supplemental Plan also covers any employee whose Retirement Plan benefit is reduced by participation in the ADM Deferred Compensation Plan. Participation by those employees who otherwise qualify for coverage is at the discretion of the Board, the Compensation and Succession Committee or, in the case of employees other than executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer. The Supplemental Plan provides the additional benefit that would have been provided under the Retirement Plan but for the limits of Section 415 or 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code, and but for the fact that elective contributions made by the participant under the ADM Deferred Compensation Plan are not included in the compensation base for the Retirement Plan. A participant is not vested in a benefit under the Supplemental Plan unless and until the participant is vested in a benefit under the Retirement Plan, which requires three years of service for a cash balance formula participant and five years of service for a final average pay formula participant for vesting. A separate payment form election is required with respect to the Supplemental Plan benefit from among the same options available under the Retirement Plan, subject to the limitations of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Executive Compensation
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes information with respect to the participation of the named executive officers in the ADM Deferred Compensation Plan for Selected Management Employees I and II, which are is a non-qualified deferred compensation plans,plan, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.2023.
Name | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)(1) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last | Aggregate Balance at 12/31/21 ($) | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Balance at 12/31/23 ($) | Aggregate Balance at 12/31/23 ($) | ||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. G. YOUNG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. JONES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. D. TAETS | 0 | (204) | 45,241 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The amount reported in this column reflects a net loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
We sponsor two nonqualified deferred compensation plans — plans—the ADM Deferred Compensation Plan for Selected Management Employees I and II (referred to as “Deferred Comp Plan I” and “Deferred Comp Plan II”, respectively). Deferred Comp Plan I was frozen as to new participants and new deferrals effective January 1, 2005, and is maintained as a separate “grandfathered” plan under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Deferred Comp Plan II is structured to comply with Section 409A. Deferred Comp Plan II covers salaried employees of our companyCompany and its affiliates whose annualized base salary is $175,000 or more. Participation by those employees who otherwise qualify for coverage is at the discretion of the Board, the Compensation and Succession Committee or, in the case of employees other than executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer.
A participant in Deferred Comp Plan II can defer up to 75% of his or her base salary and up to 100% of his or her bonus. Earnings credits are added based upon hypothetical investment elections made by participants. A participant can elect each year when to be paid the base salary or bonus amounts deferred for that year, by electing to be paid upon a specified future date prior to separation from service or following retirement, in the form of a lump sum or in installments over a period of two to twenty years. If a participant separates from service prior to the elected payment date (or prior to qualifying for retirement), the payment will be made in a lump sum after separation from service, subject to the six month “specified employee” payment delay required by Section 409A. Withdrawals are allowed upon a showing of “hardship” by the participant in accordance with Section 409A. Small account balances of $10,000 or less are paid in a lump sum only.
Deferred Comp Plan II provides for “make-whole” company credits to the extent that a participant’s election to defer under the Deferred Comp Plan II causes a loss of company contributions under the 401(k) and ESOP. No “make-whole” company credits were made on behalf of the named executive officers for fiscal year 2021.2023.
A participant with an account balance remaining under Deferred Comp Plan I continues to receive earnings credits on such account based upon hypothetical investment elections made by the participant. A participant can establish up to two “scheduled distribution accounts” that are payable upon dates specified by the participant in either a lump sum or installments over a period of two to four years. A participant also can take unscheduled withdrawals of up to 25% of the balance of his or her accounts, subject to a withdrawal penalty of 10% of the withdrawn
| 66 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Nonqualified Deferred Compensation |
amount. Only one such unscheduled withdrawal is allowed in any year. Withdrawals also are allowed upon a showing of “hardship” by the participant. A participant’s account under Deferred Comp Plan I is paid following termination of employment. Payment following termination of employment is in a lump sum, except that a participant can elect to have installments paid over a period of two to 20 years if termination of employment occurs after retirement eligibility or due to disability.
Deferred Comp Plan I balances are fully-vested. A participant becomes vested in his or her company credits to Deferred Comp Plan II after two years of service. Unpaid amounts at death are paid to designated beneficiaries.
The hypothetical investment options available under Deferred Comp Plans I and II are determined by usthe Company and correspond with the investment options (other than our company’sCompany’s common stock) that are made available to participants in the qualified 401(k) and ESOP. These investment options are listed below, and the plan earnings credited to each participant’s account in these plans correspond to the earnings performance of the investment selected. Participants in the Deferred Comp Plans I and II may reallocate the amount of new deferrals and existing account balances among these investment options at any time. We do not set assets aside for the benefit of plan participants, but the Deferred Comp Plans I and II provide for full funding of all benefits upon a change in control or potential change in control, as defined in the plans.
Executive Compensation
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements
In fiscal year 2021,2023, the investment options available under Deferred Comp Plans I and II and their respective notional rates of return were as follows:
Deemed Investment Option | Fiscal Year (1/1/ | |||||
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | 6.30 | % | ||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
Vanguard Institutional 500 Index Trust | % | |||||
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund I Class | 46.21 | % | ||||
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund Class I | 17.48 | % | ||||
T. Rowe Price Institutional Mid-Cap Equity Growth Fund | 20.62 | % | ||||
Aristotle Small Cap Equity CIT Class B | 6.89 | % | ||||
Vanguard International | % | |||||
ADM 401(K) Plans Stable Value Fund | 2.52 | % | ||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2020 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2025 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2040 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Trust | % | |||||
Vanguard Target Retirement 2070 Trust Plus | 20.28 | % | ||||
Vanguard Target Retirement Income & Growth Trust Plus | 13.99 | % | ||||
Vanguard Target Retirement Income Trust | % | |||||
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 67 |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements |
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements
We have entered into certain agreements and maintain certain plans that will require us to provide compensation to our named executive officers in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control of our company.Company. See the tabular disclosure and narrative description under the “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” sections above for detail regarding payments that would result from a termination of employment or change in control of our companyCompany under our pension and nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Under the terms of our stock option agreements, vesting and exercisability accelerate upon the death of the recipient or change in control of our company,Company, and continue in accordance with the original vesting schedule if employment ends as a result of disability or retirement. If employment ends for reasons other than death, disability, retirement, or cause, a recipient forfeits any interest in the unvested portion of any option but retains the right to exercise the previously vested portion of any option for a period of three months. In addition, if an award recipient’s employment is terminated for
cause, or if the recipient breaches a non-competition or confidentiality restriction or participates in an activity deemed by us to be detrimental to our company,Company, the recipient’s right to exercise any unexercised options will terminate, the recipient’s right to receive option shares will terminate, and any shares already issued upon exercise of the option must be returned to us in exchange for the lesser of the shares’ then-current fair market value or the price paid for the shares, or the recipient must pay us cash in the amount of the gain realized by the recipient from the exercise of the option.
Under the terms of our 2019, 2020,2021, 2022, and 20212023 RSU award agreements, vesting accelerates uponin connection with a change in control of the companyCompany only if the award recipient’s employment is terminated without cause or if the award recipient resigns for good reason, in each case, within 24 months after the change in control, or if the surviving entity in the change in control transaction refuses to continue, assume, or replace the awards. Under all of our RSU award agreements, vesting accelerates upon death and continues in accordance with the original vesting schedule if employment ends as a result of disability or retirement. If employment ends for other reasons, the unvested portion of each award is forfeited. In addition, if an award recipient’s
Executive Compensation
Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements
employment is terminated for cause, or if the recipient breaches a non-competition, non-solicitation or confidentiality restriction, or participates in an activity deemed by us to be detrimental to our company, the recipient’s unvested awards will be forfeited, and any award shares that have already been issued in settlement must be returned to us or the recipient must pay us the amount of the shares’ fair market value as of the date the award vested.
Under the terms of our PSUthe award agreements for the 2021 PSUs, the 2022 PSUs and the 2023 PSUs, vesting accelerates upon the death of the award recipient, and the number of the 2019 PSU awards that vest would be based on actual performance during the truncated performance period and on a pro rata basis based on a target number of units for the performance period year(s) following the truncated performance period, if any, and the number of the 2020 and 2021 PSU awards that vest would be the target number of units.vest. Further, vesting of PSU awards accelerates uponin connection with a change in control of our companyCompany only if the award recipient’s employment is terminated without cause or if the award recipient resigns for good reason, in each case, within 24 months after the change in control, or if the surviving
entity in the change in control transaction refuses to continue, assume, or replace the awards. In such cases, (i) the 2019 PSU awards will vest based on actual performance during the truncated performance period and on a pro rata basis based on a target number of units for the performance period year(s) following the truncated performance period, if any, and (ii) the number of 20202021, 2022 and 20212023 PSU awards that vest will be equal to the greater of the target number of units or the number of PSUs earned based on actual performance during the truncated performance period. If employment ends as a result of disability or retirement, vesting will continue in accordance with the original vesting schedule. If employment ends for other reasons, the unvested portion of each award is forfeited. In addition, if an award recipient’s employment is terminated for cause, or if the recipient breaches a non-competition, non-solicitation or confidentiality restriction, or participates in an activity deemed by us to be detrimental to our company, the recipient’s unvested awards will be forfeited, and any award shares that have already been issued in settlement must be returned to us or the recipient must pay us the amount of the shares’ fair market value as of the date the award vested.
| 68 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements |
The
Other than for Mr. Macciocchi, the amount of compensation payable to each named executive officer in various termination and change in control scenarios is listed in the table below. These payments and benefits are provided under the terms of agreements involving equity compensation awards. Unless otherwise indicated, the amounts listed are calculated based on the assumption that the named executive officer’s employment was terminated or that a change in control occurred on December 31, 2021.2023. None of the named executive officers held any nonvested stock options as of such date.
As described above, Mr. Macciocchi retired from ADM on December 31, 2023. As provided by SEC rules, the table below sets forth information for Mr. Macciocchi for only the scenario that actually occurred for him, his retirement.
Name | Voluntary Termination ($) | Involuntary Termination without Cause ($) | Termination for Cause ($) | Death ($)(1) | Disability ($) | Change in Control ($)(3) | Change in Control (Non- Assumption of | Retirement ($) | Voluntary Termination ($) | Voluntary Termination ($) | Involuntary Termination without Cause ($) | Involuntary Termination without Cause ($) | Termination ($) | Termination ($) | Death ($)(1) | Death ($)(1) | Disability ($) | Disability ($) | Change in Control ($)(3) | Change in Control ($)(3) | Change in Control (Non- Assumption of Awards or Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Termination for Good Reason) ($)(4) | Change in Control (Non- Assumption of Awards or Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Termination for Good Reason) ($)(4) | Retirement ($) | Retirement ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. R. Luciano | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | (6) | (6) | 0 | 32,713,155 | (2) | 0 | 32,713,155 | (6) | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | (6) | (6) | — | 23,539,387 | (2) | — | 23,539,387 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | (6) | (6) | 0 | 40,145,554 | (2) | 0 | 40,145,554 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. G. Young | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | (6) | (6) | 0 | 11,109,566 | (2) | 0 | 11,109,566 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | (6) | (6) | — | 30,024,598 | (2) | — | 30,024,598 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. Luthar | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | (6) | (6) | — | 2,553,266 | (2) | — | 2,553,266 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | (6) | (6) | — | 3,565,646 | (2) | — | 3,565,646 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R. B. Jones | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | — | — | — | 3,882,114 | (2) | — | 3,882,114 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | — | — | — | 1,263,489 | (2) | — | 1,263,489 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | — | — | — | 4,465,579 | (2) | — | 4,465,579 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | — | — | — | 5,641,538 | (2) | — | 5,641,538 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. M. Cuddy | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | — | — | — | 4,429,758 | (2) | — | 4,429,758 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | — | — | — | 5,587,734 | (2) | — | 5,587,734 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | (6) | (6) | 0 | 13,682,311 | (2) | 0 | 13,682,311 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V. F. Macciocchi | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7,499,516 | (2) | 0 | 7,499,516 | (5) | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9,100,385 | (2) | 0 | 9,100,385 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G. A. Morris | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7,499,516 | (2) | 0 | 7,499,516 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9,100,385 | (2) | 0 | 9,100,385 | (5) | Vesting of nonvested PSU/PRSU awards | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. D. Taets | Vesting of nonvested RSU awards | (6) | (6) | 0 | 7,092,016 | (2) | 0 | 7,092,016 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of nonvested PSU awards | (6) | (6) | 0 | 8,692,885 | (2) | 0 | 8,692,885 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | ||
Executive Compensation
CEO Pay Ratio
(1)
Pursuant to the terms of the RSU awards issued under the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, vesting and exercisability of these equity awards are accelerated in full upon death. The amount shown with respect to RSU awards was calculated by multiplying the number of units as to which accelerated vesting and settlement occurs by $72.22, the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of 2023.
Due to the fact that the performance period for the 2021 PSUs ended on December 31, 2023, the amounts in this column related to the 2021 PSUs consist of the number of units as2021 PSUs that actually were earned and vested for the applicable named executive officer (except for Mr. Luthar since the determination has not be made regarding his 2021 PSUs due to which accelerated vestinghis administrative leave and, settlement occurstherefore, his 2021 PSUs are shown at target), multiplied by $67.59,$72.22, the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2021.
Due to the fact that the performance period for the 2019 PSUs ended on December 31, 2021, the amounts in this column related to the 2019 PSUs consist of the number of 2019 PSUs that actually were earned and vested for the applicable named executive officer, multiplied by $67.59, the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2021.29, 2023. The PSUs granted in 20202022 and 20212023 provide that vesting of those PSU awards will accelerate upon death in an amount equal to the target number of PSUs. Therefore, the amount shown in this column with respect to the 20202022 and 20212023 PSU awards is the target number of such PSU awards, in each case multiplied by $67.59,$72.22, the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2021.
(2) Pursuant to the terms of the stock option, RSU award and PSU award agreements issued under the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, vesting of these equity awards generally continues on the same schedule after retirement or termination of employment due to disability.
(3) All currently outstanding RSUs and PSUs are subject to a double-
trigger vesting and payout mechanism upon a change in control, meaning that only if (i) within 24 months after the change in control, one of our executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause or he or she resigns for good reason or (ii) the surviving entity in the change of control does not continue, assume, or replace the awards, the RSU awards will accelerate in full and the PSU awards will accelerate as described in footnote 4 below. Therefore, this column excludes all outstanding RSUs and PSUs.29, 2023.
| (2) | Pursuant to the terms of the award agreements issued under the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, vesting of these equity awards generally continues on the same schedule after termination of employment due to disability. |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 69 |
(4) All currently-outstanding RSUs and PSUs are subject to a double-trigger vesting and payout mechanism upon a change in control, meaning that only if (i) within 24 months after the change in control, one of our executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause or he or she resigns for good reason or (ii) the surviving entity in the change of control does not continue, assume, or replace the awards, the RSU awards will accelerate in full and the PSU awards will accelerate as follows: (a) the 2019 PSU awards will vest based on actual performance during the truncated performance period and on a pro rata basis based on a target number of units for the performance period year(s) following the truncated performance period, if any, and (b) the number of 2020 and 2021 PSU awards that vest will be equal to the greater of the target number of units or the number of PSUs earned based on actual performance during the truncated performance period. This column includes (i) all unvested RSU awards, and (ii) a portion of the unvested PSU awards (calculated in the manner set forth in footnote (1)). The amounts shown with respect to RSU and PSU awards was calculated by multiplying the number of units as to which accelerated vesting and settlement occurs by $67.59, the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2021.
(5) Because this named executive officer is not yet eligible for retirement under the terms of the ADM Retirement Plan, no current termination of employment would be considered “retirement” under any of the applicable equity-based compensation plans.
(6) Because this named executive officer is eligible for retirement, pursuant to the terms of the RSU award and PSU award agreements issued under the 2009 Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, vesting of these equity awards generally continues on the same schedule after retirement, voluntary termination or involuntary termination without cause.
| EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — CEO Pay Ratio |
| (3) | All outstanding RSUs and PSUs are subject to a double-trigger vesting and payout mechanism upon a change in control, meaning that only if (i) within 24 months after the change in control, one of our executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause or he or she resigns for good reason or (ii) the surviving entity in the change of control does not continue, assume, or replace the awards, the RSU awards will accelerate in full and the PSU awards will accelerate as described in footnote (4) below. Therefore, this column excludes all outstanding RSUs and PSUs. |
| (4) | All outstanding RSUs and PSUs are subject to a double-trigger vesting and payout mechanism upon a change in control, meaning that only if (i) within 24 months after the change in control, one of our executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause or he or she resigns for good reason or (ii) the surviving entity in the change of control does not continue, assume, or replace the awards, the RSU awards will accelerate in full and the number of 2021, 2022 and 2023 PSU awards that vest will be equal to the greater of the target number of units or the number of PSUs earned based on actual performance during the truncated performance period. This column includes (i) all unvested RSU awards, and (ii) a portion of the unvested PSU awards (calculated in the manner set forth in footnote (1)). The amounts shown with respect to the awards was calculated by multiplying the number of units as to which accelerated vesting and settlement occurs by $72.22, the closing sale price of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023. |
| (5) | Because this named executive officer is not yet eligible for retirement under the terms of the ADM Retirement Plan, no current termination of employment would be considered “retirement” under any of the applicable equity-based compensation plans. |
| (6) | Because this named executive officer is eligible for retirement (and, in the case of Mr. Macciocchi, actually retired on December 31, 2023), pursuant to the terms of the RSU award and PSU award agreements issued under the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, vesting of these equity awards generally continues on the same schedule after retirement, voluntary termination or involuntary termination without cause other than the PRSUs granted to Mr. Macciocchi, which were forfeited upon his retirement. |
CEO PAY RATIOPay Ratio
For our fiscal year 20212023 pay ratio analysis, we determined that there has been no change in either our employee population or our employee compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact our fiscal year 20212023 pay ratio disclosure. However, becauseSimilarly, there were changeshas been no change in the circumstances of the median employee who we identified for our fiscal year 20192022 pay ratio analysis that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change to our fiscal year 2023 pay ratio disclosure. Because there were no such changes, we are using another employee whose compensation is substantially similar to the originalsame median employee based on the compensation measure used to select the original median employee, as permitted by SEC rules.identified for our fiscal year 2022 pay ratio analysis.
Our median employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal year 20212023 was $81,320.$81,467. The annual total compensation of our ChairmanBoard Chair and CEO for fiscal year 20212023 was $23,511,265.$24,414,668. The ratio between the ChairmanBoard Chair and CEO’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee is 290:300:1.
With respect to our median employee, we identified and calculated the elements of the employee’s annual total compensation for 20212023 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K and also included $13,037$19,929 as the estimated value of the median employee’s 20212023 employer-paid health care and short-term disabilitybasic life insurance premiums. With respect to the annual total compensation of our ChairmanBoard Chair and CEO, we used the amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table and also included $2,424$15,714 as the estimated value of our ChairmanBoard Chair and CEO’s 20212023 employer-paid health care and basic life insurance and short-term disability insurance premiums.
Supplemental Pay RatioSUPPLEMENTAL PAY RATIO
Our global footprint drives the median pay level at ADM. Sixty percentApproximately 60% of our workforce is employed outside the United States. We aim to provide competitive pay and benefits for each employee’s role in every business segment and geography. To be consistent with our compensation philosophy, all global colleagues are paid based upon their local market as reviewed on an annual basis to ensure they are paid competitively. We believe this information is useful to put the SEC-required pay ratio provided above into context.
In addition, as in prior years, we are also providing a supplemental pay ratio that includes our domestic employees only. We identified the median employee for purposes of the 2022 supplemental pay ratio analysis using the same methodology as the 2022 required pay ratio.ratio analysis. However, because the median employee who we identified for our 2022 supplemental pay ratio analysis is no longer employed by the Company, we are using another employee whose compensation is substantially similar to that median employee based on the compensation measure used to select the median employee for our 2022 supplemental pay ratio analysis. Applying this methodology to our employees located in the United States only (other than our ChairmanBoard Chair and CEO), we determined that our median employee in fiscal year 20212023 had annual total compensation in the amount of $91,980.$116,265.
As a result, the fiscal year 20212023 ratio of the total annual compensation of our ChairmanBoard Chair and CEO to the total annual compensation of our median employee in the United States, each as calculated above to include 20212023 employer-paid health care and basic life and short-term disability insurance premiums, is 256:210:1. This supplemental pay ratio is not a substitute for the required CEO pay ratio, but we believe it is helpful in fully evaluating the ratio of our ChairmanBoard Chair and CEO’s annual total compensation to that of our median employee.
| 70 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE |
Fiscal Year | Summary Compensation Table (SCT) Total For PEO 1 ($) | Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) to PEO 2 ($) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs 1 ($) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs 2 ($) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | Net Income ($) | Company Selected Measure: Adjusted ROIC 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shareholder Return (TSR) 3 ($) | Peer Group TSR 3 ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 24,414,668 | (271,382 | ) | 5,348,455 | 1,932,743 | 72.00 | 65.40 | 3,483,000,000 | 12.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 24,749,178 | 65,662,660 | 5,891,112 | 14,567,967 | 116.10 | 24.40 | 4,340,000,000 | 13.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 23,508,841 | 60,063,855 | 6,078,204 | 15,161,710 | 54.40 | 57.20 | 2,709,000,000 | 10.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 22,749,628 | 33,167,553 | 7,169,286 | 9,758,997 | 12.50 | 21.50 | 1,772,000,000 | 7.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | For each of 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020, our PEO was J uan Luciano . For each of 2021 and 2020, the Non-PEO NEOs were Ray Young, Vincent Macciocchi, Gregory Morris, and Joseph Taets. For 2022, the Non-PEO NEOs included the same NEOs as in 2021 and 2020, as well as Vikram Luthar and Christopher Cuddy. For 2023, the Non-PEO NEOs were Vikram Luthar, Regina Jones, Gregory Morris, Christopher Cuddy and Vincent Macciocchi. |
| (2) | The dollar amounts reported represent the Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”) to Mr. Luciano and the Non-PEO NEOs in accordance with, and using the adjustments set forth in, Item 402(v) of RegulationS-K. The following adjustments related to pension plans and equity awards were made to their total compensation each year as reported in the SCT to determine the CAP: |
Reconciliation of PEO Summary Compensation Table Total to Compensation Actually Paid |
Fiscal Year | Reported SCT Total ($) | Reported Value of Equity Awards ($) | Equity Award Adjustments ($) | Dividends Paid or Accrued on Unvested Shares and Stock Options ($) | Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits ($) | Pension Benefit Adjustments ($) | Compensation Actually Paid ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 24,414,668 | (17,919,686 | ) | (7,597,412 | ) | 902,498 | (117,551 | ) | 46,100 | (271,382 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 24,749,178 | (17,727,259 | ) | 57,902,844 | 689,008 | — | 48,889 | 65,662,660 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 23,508,841 | (15,939,571 | ) | 51,787,958 | 718,567 | (59,843 | ) | 47,903 | 60,063,855 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 22,749,628 | (15,940,148 | ) | 25,738,557 | 692,287 | (112,853 | ) | 40,082 | 33,167,553 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 71 |
| PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE |
Reconciliation of Non-PEO NEOs Summary Compensation Table Total to Compensation Actually Paid |
Fiscal Year | Reported SCT Total ($) | Reported Value of Equity Awards ($) | Equity Award Adjustments ($) | Dividends Paid or Accrued on Unvested Shares and Stock Options ($) | Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits ($) | Pension Benefit Adjustments ($) | Compensation Actually Paid ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 5,348,455 | (3,746,208 | ) | 288,332 | 132,976 | (107,675 | ) | 16,864 | 1,932,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 5,891,112 | (3,657,711 | ) | 12,165,647 | 143,963 | — | 24,956 | 14,567,967 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 6,078,204 | (3,533,337 | ) | 12,401,366 | 184,138 | (14,810 | ) | 46,149 | 15,161,710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 7,169,286 | (4,556,257 | ) | 7,322,254 | 179,588 | (398,558 | ) | 42,685 | 9,758,997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (3) | Our peer group for the calculation of TSR is the S&P 100, which is the industry index used to show our performance in our CD&A. TSR, in the case of both the Company and our peer group, reflects the cumulative return on $100 as if invested on December 31, 2019, including reinvestment of any dividends, and is rounded to the nearest tenth. |
| (4) | Our company selected measure, which we believe represents the most important financial performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used by the Company to link CAP to the NEOs for 2023 to company performance, is Adjusted ROIC. Adjusted ROIC is one of the metrics under both the 2023 annual cash incentive program and the 2023 PSUs. Adjusted ROIC (return on invested capital, adjusted to exclude the impact of certain items) is a non-GAAP financial measure. Annex A to this Proxy Statement provides a more detailed definition of this term, a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and related disclosures about the use of this non-GAAP financial measure. |
In order to calculate CAP, the following amounts were excluded from or added to the SCT total compensation: |
Reconciliation of the Pension and Equity Award Adjustments for the PEO’s Compensation Actually Paid |
Fiscal Year | Reported SCT Total ($) | Pension & Equity amounts reported in SCT ($) | Pension value attributable to covered years’ service and any change in pension value attributable to plan amendments made in covered year ($) | Dividends paid or accrued on unvested shares and stock options ($) | Change in fair value related to equity awards a,b ($) | CAP ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 24,414,668 | (18,037,237 | ) | 46,100 | 902,498 | (7,597,412 | ) | (271,382 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 24,749,178 | (17,727,259 | ) | 48,889 | 689,008 | 57,902,844 | 65,662,660 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 23,508,841 | (15,999,414 | ) | 47,903 | 718,567 | 51,787,958 | 60,063,855 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 22,749,628 | (16,053,001 | ) | 40,082 | 692,287 | 25,738,557 | 33,167,553 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of the Pension and Equity Award Adjustments for the Average of Non-PEO NEO’s Compensation Actually Paid |
Fiscal Year | Reported SCT Total ($) | Pension & Equity amounts reported in SCT ($) | Pension value attributable to covered years’ service and any change in pension value attributable to plan amendments made in covered year ($) | Dividends paid or accrued on unvested shares and stock options ($) | Change in fair value related to equity awards a,b ($) | CAP ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 5,348,455 | (3,853,883 | ) | 16,864 | 132,976 | 288,332 | 1,932,743 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 5,891,112 | (3,657,711 | ) | 24,956 | 143,963 | 12,165,647 | 14,567,967 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 6,078,204 | (3,548,148 | ) | 46,149 | 184,138 | 12,401,366 | 15,161,710 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 7,169,286 | (4,954,815 | ) | 42,685 | 179,588 | 7,322,254 | 9,758,997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | With respect to performance-based equity awards, change in fair value is based on the probable outcome of the related performance metrics. |
| (b) | The amounts deducted or added are as follows to determine the equity award adjustments for year-over-year change in fair value: |
72 | |
| PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE |
Fiscal Year | Fair Value at Covered Year- End of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Awards Granted in Prior Years that are Unvested at End of Covered Year | Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Covered Year | Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Covered Year | Fair Value at End of the Prior Year of Prior Year Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Covered Year | Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid or Accrued on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation | Total Equity Award Adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 23,167,914 | (25,124,590 | ) | — | (5,640,736 | ) | — | — | (7,597,412 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 29,050,156 | 24,982,970 | — | 3,869,718 | — | — | 57,902,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 29,297,900 | 19,489,626 | — | 3,000,433 | — | — | 51,787,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 25,686,592 | 408,760 | — | (356,795 | ) | — | — | 25,738,557 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year | Fair Value at Covered Year- End of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Awards Granted in Prior Years that are Unvested at End of Covered Year | Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Covered Year | Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Covered Year | Fair Value at End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Covered Year | Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid or Accrued on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation | Total Equity Award Adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 | 4,605,203 | (3,418,100 | ) | — | (898,772 | ) | — | — | 288,332 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | 6,009,503 | 5,340,024 | — | 816,121 | — | — | 12,165,647 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 | 6,494,489 | 5,193,596 | — | 713,281 | — | — | 12,401,366 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 7,342,134 | 57,093 | — | (76,973 | ) | — | — | 7,322,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 73 |
| PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE |
| * | TSR valuations are based upon a fixed value initial investment of $100 as of December 31, 2019 for determination of both peer group and Company TSR from 2020 through 2023. |
74 | |
| PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE |
| * | Adjusted ROIC is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Annex A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. |
ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 75 |
Executive Stock Ownership
Executive Officer Stock Ownership
The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of April 4, 2024, directly or indirectly, by each of the named executive officers.
Executive | Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1) | Options Exercisable Within 60 Days | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||
J. R. LUCIANO | 2,398,947 | (2) | 905,920 | * | |||||||||||
V. LUTHAR | 141,459 | (3) | 28,366 | * | |||||||||||
R. B. JONES | — | — | * | ||||||||||||
G. A. MORRIS | 253,021 | (4) | — | * | |||||||||||
C. M. CUDDY | 268,329 | (5) | — | * | |||||||||||
V. F. MACCIOCCHI | 255,598 | — | * | ||||||||||||
| * | Less than 1% of outstanding shares |
| (1) | Includes for each named executive officer stock options exercisable within 60 days. Does not include the following number of unvested RSUs since none of these RSUs vest within 60 days: |
| Unvested RSUs | |||||
J. R. Luciano | 265,210 | ||||
V. Luthar | 22,214 | ||||
R. B. Jones | 70,308 | ||||
G. A. Morris | 49,015 | ||||
C. M. Cuddy | 47,364 | ||||
V. F. Macciocchi | 27,164 | ||||
| (2) | Includes 1,310,288 shares held in trust and 238 shares held by a family-owned limited liability company. |
| (3) | Includes 40,336 shares held in trust and 2,008 shares held in the 401(k) and ESOP. |
| (4) | Includes 679 shares held in the 401(k) and ESOP. |
| (5) | Includes 2,345 shares held in the 401(k) and ESOP. |
Common stock beneficially owned as of April 4, 2024, by all directors, director nominees, and current executive officers (as of April 4, 2024) as a group, numbering 19 persons, is 3,473,635 shares representing 0.7% of the outstanding shares, of which 273,333 shares represent stock units allocated under our Stock Unit Plan for Nonemployee Directors, 5,965 shares are held in the 401(k) and ESOP, 934,286 shares are unissued but are subject to stock options exercisable within 60 days, and no shares are subject to pledge.
| 76 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
Equity Compensation Plan Information; Related Transactions
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION AT DECEMBEREquity Compensation Plan Information at December 31, 20212023
Plan Category | Number of to be Issued of Outstanding Warrants, and | Weighted- Warrants and | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column | Number of to be Issued of Outstanding Warrants, and | Number of to be Issued of Outstanding Warrants, and | Weighted- Warrants and | Weighted- Warrants and | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in First Column | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in First Column | |||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders | 11,755,947(1) | $42.65(2) | 16,809,471(3) | 6,957,212 | (1) | $61.24 | (2) | 13,525,382 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 11,755,947(1) | $42.65(2) | 16,809,471(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 6,957,212( | 1) | $61.24( | 2) | 13,525,382 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Consists of 4,998,584 shares to be issued upon vesting of outstanding RSUs, 2,133,049 shares to be issued upon vesting of outstanding PSUs, and 4,624,314 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options pursuant to the Company’s 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, all as of December 31, 2021.
(2) Weighted-average exercise price for outstanding stock options.
(3) Consists of shares available for issuance pursuant to the Company’s 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, as of December 31, 2021. Benefits which may be granted under the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan are options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and cash-based awards.
*Based on Target Share Amounts for PSUs. Number of PSUs issued would be 4,557,737 under the maximum payout conditions.
| (1) | Consists of 3,614,029 shares to be issued upon vest of outstanding RSUs, 1,718,252 shares to be issued upon vest of outstanding PSUs and PRSUs, and 1,624,931 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options pursuant to the Company’s 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan all as of December 31, 2023. |
| (2) | Weighted-average exercise price for outstanding stock options. |
| (3) | Consists of shares available for issuance pursuant to the Company’s 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan, as of December 31, 2023. Benefits which may be granted under the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan are options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and cash-based awards. |
| * | Based on target share amounts for PSUs and maximum share amounts for PRSUs. Number of PSUs issued would be 3,891,714 under the maximum payout conditions. |
As of March 14, 2022,April 4, 2024, our companyCompany does not have any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our stockholders.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONSReview and Approval of Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Various policies and procedures of our company,Company, including our Code of Conduct, our bylaws, the charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and annual questionnaires completed by all of our directors and executive officers, require the directors and executive officers to disclose and otherwise identify to the companyCompany the transactions or relationships that may constitutecould be viewed as constituting potential or actual conflicts of interest or otherwise require disclosure under applicable SEC rules as “related person transactions” between our companyCompany or its subsidiaries and related persons. For these purposes, a related person is a director, executive officer, nominee for director, or 5% stockholder of the companyCompany since the beginning of the last fiscal year and their immediate family members.
Although the company’sCompany’s processes vary with the particular transaction or relationship, in accordance with our Code of Conduct, directors, executive officers, and other companyCompany employees are directed to inform appropriate supervisory personnel as to the existence or potential existence of such a transaction or relationship. To the extent a related person is involved in the relationship or has a material interest in the transaction, the company’s practice, although not part of a written policy, is to refer considerationcharter of the matter to the Board orAudit Committee provides that the Audit Committee.Committee will review the transaction or relationship. The Audit Committee will evaluate various aspects of the transaction or relationship will be evaluated by the Board or the Audit Committee, whichand will approve or ratify it if it is determined that the transaction or relationship is fair and in the best interests of the company.Company. Generally, transactions and series of related transactions of less than $120,000 are approved or ratified by appropriate companyCompany supervisory personnel and are not approved or ratified by the Board or a committee thereof.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONSCertain Relationships and Related Transactions
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021,2023, the brother of Christopher Cuddy, one of our named executive officers, was employed by our companyCompany as a vice president of strategic accounts.accounts and earned total compensation of approximately $427,000 in fiscal 2023. The compensation for Mr. Cuddy’s brother is appropriate for his role and aligned to that of his peers’ compensation in accordance with the Company’s compensation philosophy and practices for those of equivalent experience and responsibilities. Such relationship was considered by the Audit Committee and found to be fair and in the best interests of our company.Company.
Additionally, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, ADM purchased approximately $169,000 of grain from Flatland Farms, of which Christopher Cuddy is the sole proprietor. Such related transaction was considered by the Audit Committee and found to be fair and in the best interests of our Company.
| ADM Proxy Statement |
Proposal No. 3
Proposal No. 3 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.
The Audit Committee no less than annually reviews Ernst & Young LLP’s independence and performance in connection with the Audit Committee’s determination of whether to retain Ernst & Young or engage another firm as our independent registered public accounting firm to assure continuing auditor independence. In the course of these reviews, the Audit Committee considers, among other things:
| • | Ernst & Young’s historical and recent audit performance, including input from our Audit Committee and employees with substantial contact with Ernst & Young throughout the year about Ernst & Young’s quality of service provided, and the independence, objectivity, and professional skepticism demonstrated throughout the engagement by Ernst & Young and its audit team; |
| • | An analysis of Ernst & Young’s known legal risks and significant proceedings; |
| • | External data relating to audit quality and performance, including recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) reports on Ernst & Young and its peer firms; |
| • | The appropriateness of Ernst & Young’s fees, on both an absolute basis and as compared to its peer firms; and |
| • | Ernst & Young’s tenure as our independent auditor and its familiarity with our global operations and businesses, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting. |
Ernst & Young LLP, or its predecessor firms, has served as our independent registered public accounting firm for more than 90 years. The Audit Committee believes that this long tenure results in higher quality audit work and greater operational efficiencies by leveraging Ernst & Young’s deep institutional knowledge of our global operations and businesses, accounting policies and practices, and internal controls. In conjunction with the required rotation of Ernst & Young’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair are directly involved in the selection of Ernst & Young’s new lead engagement partner.
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young to our stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. The members of the Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors, believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of our Company and its stockholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young will be present at the meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice. | |||||||
| 78 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 3 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The following table shows the aggregate fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP by us for the services it rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022.
Description of Fees | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 18,893,000 | $ | 18,551,000 | ||||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | $ | 5,170,000 | $ | 2,136,000 | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) | $ | 2,216,000 | $ | 2,679,000 | ||||||
All Other Fees(4) | $ | 625,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||||
Total | $ | 26,904,000 | $ | 23,376,000 | ||||||
| (1) | Includes fees for audit of annual financial statements, reviews of the related quarterly financial statements, audit of the effectiveness of our Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and certain statutory audits. |
| (2) | Includes fees for accounting and reporting assistance, due diligence for mergers and acquisitions, and audit-related work in connection with employee benefit plans of our Company. |
| (3) | Includes fees related to tax planning advice and tax compliance. |
| (4) | Includes fees for advisory services related to strategic transactions or divestitures. |
AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES
The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy. This policy provides that audit services engagement terms and fees, and any changes in such terms or fees, are subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The policy further provides that all other audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and permitted non-audit services are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee. All of the services Ernst & Young LLP performed for us during fiscal years 2023 and 2022 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 79 |
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to the stockholders relating to the Company’s (i) financial statements and the financial reporting process, (ii) preparation of the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to any governmental or regulatory body, (iii) systems of internal accounting and financial controls, (iv) the internal audit function, (v) the tax function, (vi) the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements, (vii) major risk exposures, (viii) legal compliance and ethics programs as established by management and the Board, (ix) related-party transactions, and (x) performance of the compliance function.
The Audit Committee assures that the corporate information gathering, analysis, and reporting systems developed by management represent a good faith attempt to provide senior management and the Board of Directors with information regarding material acts, events, and conditions within the Company. In addition, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee ensures that the Company establishes, resources, and maintains a professional internal auditing function and that there are no unjustified restrictions or limitations imposed on such function. The Audit Committee reviews the effectiveness of the internal audit function and reviews and approves the actions relating to the General Auditor, including performance appraisals and related base and incentive compensation. The Audit Committee is comprised of six independent directors, all of whom are financially literate and one of whom (T. K. Crews,(M.S. Burke, the Chairman)Chair) has been determined by the Board of Directors to be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality — quality—not just the acceptability — acceptability—of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, the development and selection of the critical accounting estimates, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. Also, the Audit Committee discussed with management education regarding compliance with the policies and procedures of the Company as well as federal and state laws.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with the independent auditor, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC, including their judgment as to the quality — quality—not just the acceptability — acceptability—of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditor required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent auditor the auditor’s independence from management and the Company. The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy and considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the independent auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors approved) a hiring policy related to current and former employees of the independent auditor.
The Audit Committee discussed the Company’s major risk exposures, the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, and guidelines and policies to govern the Company’s risk assessment and risk management processes.
The meetings of the Audit Committee are designed to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, the Company, the Company’s internal audit function, and the Company’s independent auditor. The Audit Committee discussed with the internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the accounting and financial controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee met individually with members of management in executive session. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal year 2021.2023.
The Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Company’s independent auditor, both in fact and appearance. Each year, the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance, tenure, and independence of the Company’s independent auditor and determines whether to re-engage the current independent auditor.
Report of the Audit Committee
Report of the Audit Committee
In doing so, the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the auditors, the auditors’ global capabilities, and the auditors’ technical expertise and knowledge of the Company’s operations and industry. Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.2024. The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that, due to Ernst & Young LLP’s knowledge of the Company and of the industries in which the Company operates, it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to continue retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company’s independent auditor. Although the Audit
| 80 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE — Report of the Audit Committee |
Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent auditors, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20212023, for filing with the SEC.
T. K. Crews, ChairmanM. S. Burke, Chair
T. Colbert
P. DufourE. de Brabander
S. F. Harrison
P. J. Moore
F. J. Sanchez
D. A. Sandler
| ADM Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL NO. 4
Proposal No. 2 — Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Ernst & Young LLP, or its predecessor firms, has served as our independent registered public accounting firm for more than 85 years.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with our company’s retention of Ernst & Young LLP. In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be regular rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm. In conjunction with the required rotation of Ernst & Young LLP’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair are directly involved in the selection of Ernst & Young LLP’s new lead engagement partner.
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. The members of the Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors, believe that the continued retention of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of our company and its stockholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.
FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The following table shows the aggregate fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP by us for the services it rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020.
Description of Fees | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $17,725,000 | $17,391,000 | ||||||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) | $3,797,000 | $2,710,000 | ||||||||
Tax Fees(3) | $1,735,000 | $2,198,000 | ||||||||
All Other Fees | — | — | ||||||||
Total | $23,257,000 | $22,299,000 | ||||||||
(1) Includes fees for audit of annual financial statements, reviews of the related quarterly financial statements, audit of the effectiveness of our company’s internal control over financial reporting, and certain statutory audits.
(2) Includes fees for accounting and reporting assistance, due diligence for mergers and acquisitions, and audit-related work in connection with employee benefit plans of our company.
(3) Includes fees related to tax planning advice and tax compliance.
AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES
The Audit Committee has adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy. This policy provides that audit services engagement terms and fees, and any changes in such terms or fees, are subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The policy further provides that all other audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and permitted non-audit services are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee. All of the services Ernst & Young LLP performed for us during fiscal years 2021 and 2020 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
Proposal No. 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the following proposal provides our stockholders with an opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. In considering your vote, you may wish to review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” discussion herein, which provides details as to our compensation policies, procedures, and decisions regarding the named executive officers, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables, notes, and narrative disclosures in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific element of our executive compensation program, but rather the overall compensation program for our named executive officers.
The Compensation and Succession Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, and the Board of Directors believe that the executive compensation policies, procedures, and decisions made with respect to our named executive officers are competitive, are based on our pay-for-performance philosophy, and are focused on achieving our company’s goals and enhancing stockholder value.
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above and in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, the Board asks our stockholders to vote FOR the adoption of the following resolution to be presented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2022:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.
Although this advisory vote is not binding on the Board of Directors, the Board and the Compensation and Succession Committee will review and expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the advisory resolution on the compensation of our company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.
Proposal No. 4 — Stockholder Proposal to Remove the One-Year Holding Period Requirement to Call a Special Stockholder Meeting— Independent Board Chairman
We expect the following proposal to be presented by a stockholder at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with SEC rules, the stockholder proposal is presented below as submitted by the stockholder. The Company disclaims all responsibility for the content of the proposal. John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, owner of 100 shares, is the proponent of the following stockholder proposal.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
Proposal 4 – Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement4—Independent Board Chairman
Shareholders ask our board to takerequest that the steps necessary toBoard of Directors adopt an enduring policy, and amend the appropriate company governing documents to giveas necessary in order that 2 separate people hold the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting.
Oneoffice of the main purposesChairman and the office of this proposalthe CEO.
Whenever possible, the Chairman of the Board shall be an Independent Director.
The Company has the discretion to select a Temporary Chairman of the Board who is not an Independent Director to give shareholdersserve while the right to formally participate in calling forBoard is seeking an Independent Chairman of the Board on an accelerated basis.
Although it is a special shareholder meeting regardless of their length of stock ownership to the fullest extent possible.
It is importantbest practice to adopt this proposal because all Archer-Daniels-Midland shares not heldsoon this policy could be phased in when there is a contract renewal for one continuous year are now 100% disqualified from formally participatingour current CEO or for the next CEO transition.
This proposal topic won 52% support at Boeing and 54% support at Baxter International in the call2020. Boeing then adopted this proposal topic.
A lead director is no substitute for a special shareholder meeting. Under this un-noticed and ill-conceived ADM rule management discriminates against shareholders who bought ADM stock during the past 12 months.
Such shareholders are now second-class shareholders as far as having input to management. And shareholders who recently made the investment decision to buy ADM stock or increase their holdings can be the most informed shareholders.
Although it theoretically takes 10% of shares toan independent board chairman. A lead director cannot call a special shareholder meeting due to the disqualification of all shares owned for less than one continuous year, the shareholders who own 10%and cannot even call a special meeting of the narrowly qualified shares, could discoverboard. A lead director can delegate most of his lead director duties to others and then simply rubber-stamp it. There is no way shareholders can be sure of what goes on.
A lead director can be given a list of duties but there is no rule that they own 20% or our stock when length of stock ownership is factored out.
Plus all shares not held long are disqualified. Thus,prevents the shareholders who own 10%Chairman from overriding the lead director in any of the narrowly qualified shares could discover that they own 25% or our stock when shares not held long and lengthso-called lead director duties.
Mr. Juan Luciano, ADM Chairman/CEO was one of stock ownership are both factored out.
Plus the owners of 25% of shares could discover that they own 31% of the stock that votes at the annual meeting. A potential 31% stock ownership requirement to call for a special shareholder meeting is nothing for management to brag about.
A3 ADM directors who each received more reasonable shareholder right to call for a special shareholder meeting will help ensure that management engages with shareholders in good faith because shareholders will have a viable Plan B by calling for a special shareholder meeting.
A reasonable shareholder right to call for a special shareholder meeting could give directors more of an incentive to improve their performance. For instance, Mr. Kelvin Westbrook, chair of the management pay committee, was rejected by 60than 27 million against votes in 2021. This was up to 27-times the negative votes of other ADM directors. Plus ADM management pay was rejected by even2023. Mr. Patrick Moore, with 21-years excessive tenure, received more against votes than Mr. Westbrook.Luciano.
ThisThe lackluster performance of ADM stock is one more reason to vote for this proposal. ADM stock fell from $97 to $72 in late 2022 compared to late 2023. Now is a corporate governance improvement proposal like an earlier ADM shareholder proposalgood time for an independent board chairman that received 47% shareholder support. This 47% shareholder support likely exceeded 51% shareholder support froma change for the shares that have access to independent proxy voting advice and are not forced to rely on the biased opinion of management.better.
Please vote yes:Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement –
Independent Board Chairman—Proposal 4
| 82 | ADM Proxy Statement |
| PROPOSAL NO. 4 — Proposal No. 4 — Stockholder Proposal – Independent Board Chairman |
Proposal No. 4
Proposal No. 4 — Stockholder Proposal to Remove the One-Year Holding Period Requirement to Call a Special Stockholder Meeting
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGAINST THE PROPOSAL
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSAGAINSTTHE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL |
The Board has carefully considered the above proposal, believes the proposal is not in the best interests of ADM and its stockholders for the reasons set forth below, and recommends that stockholders vote against the proposal.
ADM’s Special Meeting Right Reflects Extensive
The Board believes it is important to maintain the flexibility to implement the leadership structure best suited for the Company and its stockholders based on the Company’s circumstances at any given time. |
The Board regularly reviews and assesses the Board leadership structure, and considers the merits of alternative structures as part of its evaluation. |
In the event the Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer roles are held by the same individual, the independent directors elect a Lead Director with extensive, well-defined responsibilities to ensure the Board provides effective independent oversight of management. |
Flexibility to Determine Board ConsiderationLeadership Structure is in the Best Interest of the Company and its Stockholders
The Board believes it is Aligned with Current Best Practices
important to maintain the flexibility to use its business judgment to choose whether to separate the Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer roles at the Company. The Board believes the proposed policy would be detrimental to the Company because it would remove the Board’s flexibility and narrow the governance arrangements that the Board may consider. With its deep and diverse experience in business and governance, its in-depth knowledge of the Company’s leadership team, as well as its understanding of the Company, the Board is in the best position to make a determination of the Board leadership structure that is best suited for the Company at any given time. The Company has consistently demonstrated a commitment to strong corporate governanceparticipates in competitive and responsiveness to stockholders. In February 2013,dynamic industries, and the Board adopted an amendment to our bylaws that reduced the ownership threshold for stockholders to call special stockholder meetings from a majority of the outstanding shares to not less than 10% of such shares. That amendment also included a customary provision that stockholders requesting a special meeting must have held such shares for at least one year. This 10% threshold is among the lowest, and thus most stockholder-friendly, among ADM and similar public companies.
The Board adopted the amendment after thorough consideration. The Board carefully evaluated various terms including ownership thresholds and potential length of holding periods. In addition, the Board considered existing stockholder rights, investors’ views, other companies’ stockholder rights to call special meetings, and ADM’s institutional investor profile. The Board believes that the current special meeting right, includingcircumstances and challenges facing the low ownership thresholdCompany, as well as the individual skills, qualifications, and nominal one-year holding period, reflectsexperiences that make for an effective Board Chair, will vary over time. Therefore, the perspectives of our stockholders, is consistent with (indeed, more stockholder-friendly than) market practice, and strikesBoard believes that, depending on the proper balance between ensuring that stockholders have the ability to call a special meeting and protecting against the risk that some stockholders, whoCompany’s circumstances at any given point in time, it may have narrow short-term interests, could trigger the expense and distraction of a special meeting to pursue matters that are not widely viewed as requiring immediate attention or that are being pursued for reasons that may not be in the best interests of the Company and ourits stockholders generally.for a variety of reasons to have the Company’s Chief Executive Officer also serve as the Board Chair.
Special Meetings Involve Substantial Time and Resources, and Eliminating the Holding Period Requirement Would Increase the Potential for Misuse
The Board recognizes the importance of providing our stockholders with the right to call special meetings in appropriate circumstances. Given the size of the CompanyRegularly Reviews and our large number of stockholders, a special stockholder meeting is a significant undertaking that requires substantial time, effort, expense,Assesses Board Leadership Structure
The Board regularly reviews its governance processes including its leadership structure, and management resources. The Company must prepare, print, and distribute legal disclosure documents to stockholders; host websites to provide notice and access online; and solicit proxies and tabulate votes, all of which require substantial time and effort as well as the use of Company funds to pay for the costs of the special meeting. Such time, effort, and expense are required regardless of whether the special stockholder meeting is held in person or virtually. In addition, the Board and management must divert time and focus from their responsibility of managing the Company on behalf of all stockholders to prepare for and conduct the special meeting, consequently detracting from their primary focus of operating our businesses and maximizing long-term stockholder value. Accordingly, special meetings of stockholders should be extraordinary events that occur only when there are urgent and critical matters or significant fiduciary concerns.
Our bylaws provide stockholders holding 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock for at least one year with the right to call special meetings, thus allowing for stockholders to call a special meeting when extraordinary matters arise, without enabling a minority of stockholders that have not held a financial stake in the Company for a meaningful period of time to call unnecessary or duplicative meetings for less significant matters. If the nominal one-year holding requirement is eliminated as suggested by the proponent’s proposal, the Company could be subject to regular disruptions by short-term, special-interest stockholders with agendas that are not inmakes determinations based upon the best interests of the long-termCompany and its stockholders orat that time. The Board considers, among other things, the changing needs and circumstances of the Board and the Company, and would increase the potential for misusebenefits and drawbacks of the special meeting right. It would also divert our Board’salternative leadership structures, and management’s attention from their primary focus of leading and operating our business, which could potentially operate against the best interests of our stockholders overall, in order to serve the narrow interests of the stockholders requesting a special meeting.
ADM’s Governance Practices and Policies Provide Stockholders the Ability to Communicate Views and Ensure Board Accountability and Responsiveness to Stockholders
The change requested by this stockholder proposal is unnecessary, could be potentially destructive to stockholder value, and should be rejected in light of our strongevolving corporate governance policiesbest practices. According to the Spencer Stuart U.S. Board Index 2023, approximately 61% of S&P 500 companies do not have an independent board chair. The Board also considers current trends and practices, our demonstrated willingness to discuss Company business and issues with stockholders, and our regular responsiveness to stockholders. We maintain strong corporate governance practices, provide multiple channels of communication between the Company and our stockholders, and have a proven record of corporate accountability. Our current corporate governance practices reflect our commitment to being responsive and accountable to our stockholders.
Proposal No. 4
Proposal No. 4 — Stockholder Proposal to Remove the One-Year Holding Period Requirement to Call a Special Stockholder Meeting
We encourage and appreciate our dialogue with stockholders and their invaluable input on corporate governance matters. Our Board and management team regularly assess and continually enhance our corporate governance policies and procedures, taking into account the voting results of our most recent annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholder feedback received through our engagement process,and votes on stockholder proposals—including the governance practicessimilar proposals to separate the Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer roles voted on by stockholders in 2014, 2015, 2018, and 2023, none of similar public companies, and current trends in governance.
In addition to providing ourwhich received the support of stockholders holding a majority of the Company’s shares of common stock, with the rightpercentage of stockholders supporting the proposals declining in each subsequent vote from 2014 to call a special meeting2023. Based on engagement with some of the Company’s largest stockholders over the past year in 2023, and as reiterated by the declining stockholder vote for similar shareholder proposals at a relatively low thresholdthe Company in the past ten years, we believe many of 10%, we have implemented numerous other corporate governance measuresour investors continue to ensure thatsupport the Board’s approach to maintain flexibility to choose the best leadership structure for the Company.
Our Lead Director and the Board’s Corporate Governance Practices Support Effective Independent Oversight and Leadership
Each year, if the Board remains accountable to our stockholders and that give stockholders the ability to directly communicate their views to the Board. Some of these measures are:
Our stockholders have the opportunity to cast a vote with respect to all of our directors at least once per year. Our BoardChair is not classified andindependent, our independent directors serve one-year terms.
We haveelect a majority voting standard for the election of directorsLead Director. Our Lead Director has extensive, well-defined responsibilities as set forth in an uncontested election. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines each director annually submitsto ensure our Board provides effective independent oversight of management. Our Lead Director:
| • | Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Board Chair is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, and regularly meets with the Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer for discussion of appropriate matters arising from these sessions; |
| • | Has the authority to call, and set the agendas for, meetings of the independent directors; |
| • | Coordinates the activities of the other independent directors and serves as liaison between the Board Chair and the independent directors; |
| • | Consults with the Board Chair and approves all meeting agendas, schedules, and information provided to the Board, and may, from time to time, invite corporate officers, other employees, and advisors to attend Board or committee meetings whenever deemed appropriate; |
| • | Interviews, along with the Board Chair and the Chair and members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, all director candidates and makes recommendations to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; |
| • | Advises the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on the selection of members of the Board committees; |
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | 83 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 4 — Proposal No. 4 — Stockholder Proposal – Independent Board Chairman |
| • | Advises the Board committees on the selection of committee chairs; |
| • | Works with the Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer to propose a schedule of major discussion items for the Board; |
| • | Guides the Board’s governance processes; |
| • | Provides leadership to the Board if circumstances arise in which the role of the Board Chair or Chief Executive Officer may be, or may be perceived to be, in conflict; |
| • | If requested by major stockholders, ensures that the Lead Director is available for consultation and direct communication; |
| • | Leads the non-management directors in determining performance criteria for evaluating the Chief Executive Officer and coordinates the annual performance review of the Chief Executive Officer; |
| • | Works with the Chair of the Compensation and Succession Committee to guide the Board’s discussion of management succession plans; |
| • | Works with the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to facilitate the evaluation of the performance of the Board, committees, and individual directors; |
| • | Works with the Chair of the Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee to set sustainability and corporate responsibility objectives; and |
| • | Performs such other duties and responsibilities as the Board may determine. |
In addition to having a Lead Director position with significant responsibilities, the Company has a number of governance structures in place to support the independent oversight function of the Board and provide an advance, contingent, irrevocable resignationeffective framework for overseeing management, including the Chief Executive Officer:
Ten out of the eleven current directors—all directors other than Mr. Luciano—are independent under the standards of the New York Stock Exchange and our Company bylaws. | Non-management directors determine the performance criteria for evaluating the Chief Executive Officer and perform the annual performance review of the Chief Executive Officer. | |
The Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation and Succession Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee are composed solely of independent directors. | The Board and each standing committee annually conduct evaluations of their performance. Directors annually evaluate each other, and these evaluations are used to assess future re-nominations to the Board. | |
Non-management directors meet privately in executive session presided over by the Lead Director at least quarterly, and if any of the non-management directors are not independent pursuant to the Board’s independence determination, at least one executive session each year will include only independent directors. | The Board and each committee of the Board has the power to retain experts or advisors without consulting or obtaining the approval of any officer of the Company. | |
Directors are elected annually with a majority voting standard for uncontested elections. | Directors have full and unrestricted access to the officers and employees of the Company. | |
Holders of 10% or more of our common stock have the ability to call a special meeting of stockholders. | Our bylaws include a proxy access provision under which a stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders that has owned at least 3% of our common stock for at least 3 years may submit nominees for up to 20% of the board seats for inclusion in our proxy statement. | |
In addition, the Board’s independent oversight is bolstered by the Board’s ongoing refreshment. Five of the ten independent directors have joined the Board since 2018, bringing fresh and diverse perspectives to the Board.
The Current Leadership Structure is the Most Effective for the Company
At present, the independent directors have unanimously determined that the Company is well-served by having both the Board may accept ifChair and Chief Executive Officer roles performed by Mr. Luciano, who provides business strategic leadership and direction for both management and the director failsBoard and who facilitates the flow of business information and communications. Having been appointed as Chief Executive Officer in January 2015, and as Chair of the Board in January 2016, Mr. Luciano possesses unparalleled knowledge of our business, products, and operations, as well as experience navigating opportunities and challenges particular to be elected throughADM. With his insight into ADM’s business, he is also able to provide strategic direction for the Board, acting together with the independent Lead Director.
Mr. Crews, who has served as our independent Lead Director since May 2023, provides strong independent leadership and oversight. Mr. Crews joined our Board in 2011. His tenure allows him to have a majority vote in an uncontested election.
Alldeep understanding of the Company’s directors,strategy, business, products, and goals. Mr. Crews is a seasoned leader having retired from Monsanto in 2009 following a 32-year tenure with the exceptioncompany that culminated in
| 84 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| PROPOSAL NO. 4 — Proposal No. 4 — Stockholder Proposal – Independent Board Chairman |
nearly a decade of service as its executive vice president and chief financial officer. Recognized by the CEO, are independent. Each of the Audit, NominatingNACD Directorship 100™ for his leadership, excellence, and Corporate Governance, Compensation and Succession, and Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committees are entirely composed of independent directors.
We align our directors’ interests with those of our stockholders through robust stock ownership requirements.
We have vigorous evaluation processes for each of the Board, the Committees, and individual directors.
We provide for “proxy access”integrity in our bylaws pursuant to which stockholders can nominate a director candidate to stand for election and have that nominee included in our proxy materials.
Our Board emphasizes stockholder involvement and input and incorporates the important feedback we receive from our stockholders through our robust outreach and engagement program, which enhances both our governance practices and the transparency of these practices to our stockholders.
We have a long record of listening to and responding to the input of our stockholders, as demonstrated by our recent engagement with many of our largest institutional stockholders. We hold formal discussions with our institutional stockholders to help us better understand the views of our investors on key topics. Our recent conversations with our institutional investors covered topics of corporate governance, enterprise risk management, executive compensation, ESG, and other related issues importantMr. Crews is well-qualified to our stockholders.
In summary,serve in the Board believes that our existing special-meeting right for stockholders is aligned with current best practices and strikes the appropriate balance between providing stockholders with meaningful rights and opportunities for involvement while balancing the interestsrole of all our stockholders. The proposed amendment would unnecessarily disrupt that balance by increasing the potential for misuse by a relatively small number of stockholders with narrow short-term interests to call a special meeting, which would require the Company to expend considerable time, effort, expense, and management resources. The Board’s proven commitment to strong corporate governance and engagement with stockholders provide stockholders the ability to communicate their views and ensure Board accountability and responsiveness.Lead Director. The Board believes that the adoptioncurrent structure enhances Company performance by allowing our Chief Executive Officer to speak for and lead the Company and Board, while also providing for effective oversight and governance by an independent Board through the independent Lead Director. The high level of this stockholder proposalcontact and communication between our Lead Director and our Board Chair throughout the year and the specificity contained in the Lead Director’s responsibilities also serve to enhance effective Board leadership.
Summary
The Board believes that maintaining its flexibility to implement the leadership structure best suited for the Company and its stockholders based on the Company’s circumstances at any given time is critical. Adopting the proposed policy is unnecessary potentially harmful, and not inwould be detrimental to the best long-term interests of ADMCompany and its stockholders. stockholders because it would remove the Board’s flexibility and narrow the governance arrangements that the Board may consider. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote AGAINST this stockholder proposal. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIRED HOLDING PERIOD FOR CALLING SPECIAL STOCKHOLDER MEETINGS.
| THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING AN INDEPENDENT BOARD CHAIR. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE SO VOTED UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY A DIFFERENT CHOICE. | |||||||
| ADM Proxy Statement |
Proposal No. 5 — Stockholder Proposal Regarding Issuance of a Report on Pesticide Use in Supply Chains
We expect the following proposal to be presented by a stockholder at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with SEC rules, the stockholder proposal is presented below as submitted by the stockholder. The Company disclaims all responsibility for the content of the proposal. As You Sow, 2020 Milvia Street, Suite 500, Berkeley, CA 94704, acting on behalf of Booth Investments LLC, owner of 285 shares, is the proponent of the following stockholder proposal.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
WHEREAS: One third of every bite of food we eat is dependent on pollinators; and pollinator species are declining at alarming rates1 in significant part due to the use of toxic pesticides on farms.2 Pesticides also cause a number of serious human health effects from cancers to neurological damage.3,4,5
Pesticides threaten farmer resiliency and productivity due to proliferation of pesticide-resistant weeds and insects, loss of top soil, and soil degradation. Pesticides also threaten biodiversity, harming soil invertebrates, birds, and mammals. Soil consistently treated with pesticides loses its ability to store water and carbon, threatening resilience to climate change.
Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) has outlined Sustainable Agriculture goals in its public reporting. However, these goals do not include any consideration for risks related to pesticide use. ADM has not disclosed if or how it tracks, reports, or reduces the use of synthetic pesticides in its agricultural supply chains, representing an important blind spot.
Other major food companies are taking action to reduce and report on pesticide risk:
General Mills discloses metrics for tracking and reporting pesticide use by suppliers in its regenerative agriculture program, including type and name of input, amount and method used, cost and date of application, and pest or disease being controlled. It also reports pounds of pesticides avoided.
Lamb Weston discloses average pesticide use data across its potato supply chains (reported in pounds of active ingredient use per ton of potatoes grown.)
Sysco reports annually on pesticide use avoided by suppliers using Integrated Pest Management (IPM) — reporting 8.4 million pounds avoided in 2019.
In a competitive marketplace that is increasingly demanding clean food and reduced stakeholder and environmental harm, understanding and tracking supplier use of pesticides reduces risk for shareholders and our company, while reducing harm to stakeholders.
BE IT RESOLVED: Shareholders request that ADM issue a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, explaining if and how the company is measuring the use in its agricultural supply chains of pesticides that cause harm to human health and the environment.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: While metrics are left to management discretion, shareholders recommend the company measure and disclose the following:
Type and amount of pesticides avoided annually through targeted strategies like regenerative agriculture programs, IPM, or other methods;
Priority pesticides for reduction or elimination;
Targets and timelines, if any, for pesticide reduction.
1https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/insect-apocalypse-under-way-toxic-pesticides-agriculture
2 https://xerces.org/pesticides/risks-pesticides-pollinators
3 https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123020#_i34
4https://www.aaas.org/news/linda-s-birnbaum-researchers-find-new-risks-low-dose-chemical-exposure
5 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01092.x
Proposal No. 5
Proposal No. 5 – Stockholder Proposal Regarding Issuance of a Report on Pesticide Use in Supply Chains
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGAINST THE PROPOSAL
The Board has carefully considered the above proposal, believes the proposal is based on inaccurate information and is unnecessary because ADM maintains robust policies and programs that promote sustainable agriculture practices as well as food safety and quality, an important aspect of which is the responsible use of pesticides. For these reasons, the Board recommends that stockholders vote against the proposal.
Although ADM does not own farms, we have robust programs and policies to manage suppliers and to address concerns about pesticide use. Given our publicly available reporting and our sustainable agriculture initiatives and goals, we believe the reporting called for in this proposal is neither necessary nor a good use of Company resources.
ADM maintains robust policies and programs that promote sustainable agriculture as well as food safety and quality, an important aspect of which is the responsible use of pesticides. The Board believes that the reporting called for in this proposal is neither necessary nor a good use of Company resources given ADM’s demonstrated leadership in responsible sourcing, robust farmer engagement, and company disclosures in the field of sustainable agriculture and food safety.
ADM has included in its Policy to Protect Forests, Biodiversity and Communities a prohibition of the use of certain agrochemicals. Further, ADM promotes the use of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices throughout its supply chains and in its facilities. ADM’s sustainability policies are located on our website, including the Protocol for Managing Supplier Non-Compliance, which provides for specific actions to be taken against suppliers who violate our policies, such as those who utilize agrochemicals in violation of ADM’s standards. ADM publishes the number of suspended suppliers in its supply chains and maintains a public Grievances and Resolutions log, which is updated monthly to track progress in investigating inquiries about its supply chains.
Working with ELEVATE, a global provider of supply chain assessments and analytics, to implement ADM’s Human Rights Policy, ADM has developed self-assessment questionnaires for growers as part of a comprehensive audit program launched in 2020. ADM utilizes third-party audits at the farm and grower association level to validate the results of the self-assessment questionnaires. The questionnaires include, among other things, farm chemical use and management inquiries, such as whether the farm uses agrochemicals and whether the farm uses methods of hazardous waste disposal. ADM deploys these questionnaires and audits on a risk priority basis throughout its global supply chains and will take corrective actions where needed.
With respect to the use of pesticides in general, ADM’s growers and suppliers around the world are required to follow all applicable laws and regulations. In addition to ADM’s Supplier Code of Conduct, ADM’s commodities sourcing contracts in Brazil provide that “products need to be grown according to the best agricultural management practices and with the rational use of agrochemicals allowed under legislation, respecting periods of non-usage and every other norm established by the [Brazilian] Agricultural Ministry.” In the United States, ADM’s contract language requires growers to abide by food safety guidelines by warranting that goods meet the minimum standards prescribed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In the European Union, ADM’s purchasing contracts include a pesticide clause that allows ADM to reject any goods, or claim contractual damages, if any pesticide is found above the legally permitted maximum residue limit on contractual load or discharge samples. We require our suppliers and growers to manage pesticide residues through their programs and make pesticide testing and use data available to us upon request. We also audit our suppliers on a regular basis to ensure quality and food safety practices are in place at the supplier site.
ADM sources certified sustainable as well as organic commodities. In the Latin American region, ADM purchases certified volumes under various soy sustainability regimes (such as 2BSvs, ADM Responsible Soy, Round Table for Responsible Soy, and International Sustainability and Carbon Certification), between 25,000-75,000 hectares owned by its direct suppliers. In addition, ADM regularly sources approximately 450,000 metric tons in the region of certified soy per year from third parties to meet customer demands. In the EMEA region, ADM sources approximately 7.5 million tons of crops under sustainable certification schemes for several commodities. Each certification scheme includes pesticide requirements and IPM requirements. IPM is designed to reduce risks to human health and the environment from the use of pesticides. These programs specifically mandate using pesticide control methods only when necessary and targeting only the pests that can harm crops. Further, ADM is one of the sponsors of the Soja Plus Program, a program organized by the Brazilian Oil Industry Association and the Soy Farming Association, that provides training on farms, including training on the “conscious usage and correct handling of agrochemicals.”
Every ADM facility has a standard operating procedure to manage risk from incoming raw materials with oversight and expertise provided by the ADM Quality Center of Excellence. ADM facilities constantly monitor for pesticide residue as an integral part of food safety assessment protocols. In addition, the products we make in corn processing facilities are put through various process steps, such as ion exchange which ensure any residues from the farm are removed.
Proposal No. 5
Proposal No. 5 – Stockholder Proposal Regarding Issuance of a Report on Pesticide Use in Supply Chains
ADM’s robust internal auditing teams, regulatory auditing agencies, and many customers of finished products audit these lab results. In addition to the strict food safety protocols that apply to incoming grain, ADM manages pests in its facilities through strict adherence to an approved list of pesticides, utilizing the Pesticide Action Network resources and guidance, logging all substances used, and training third-party pest control operators who adhere to strict protocols at all facilities.
Beyond compliance with applicable rules and regulations, ADM defines sustainable agriculture as good stewardship of the natural systems and resources that farmers rely on for crop production.
We recognize that pesticide use in the agricultural sector has led to concerns regarding the potential for unintended environmental and health impacts. We also recognize that worldwide an estimated 45% of crop production is lost to pests annually. ADM works with growers across our diverse global supply chains to support sustainable practices that substitute natural controls for some agrochemicals, foster ecosystem balance, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigate crop losses. For instance, our plant sciences team has developed varietals of mint through selective breeding programs that are naturally resistant to key mint crop pests, thus reducing the need for synthetic chemical pesticide application and, in India, our oilseeds colleagues have worked for the past 20 years with smallholders to implement sustainable soybean growing practices. Over 250,000 growers have been reached through our programs, which include reducing chemical application, reducing water usage, increasing soil potential, and promoting biodiversity.
To date, ADM has engaged over 13 million acres in sustainable agriculture programs, globally. Over 500 farms, or 2 million hectares, have enrolled in the Doing it Right Program in Brazil. This program fosters sustainable farm practices and the use of IPM. In addition, ADM drives sustainable agriculture practices through membership in the Field to Market program in North America. Four of Field to Market’s metrics consider pest management as an important component of environmental impact. Farmer scores are affected by the number and type of chemical applications which, in turn, affect energy used and carbon dioxide released from the manufacturing of chemicals and applying chemicals to the field. Separately, adoption of IPM is included in the measurement of biodiversity and water quality. Cover crops, often a part of sustainable agriculture practices, can create habitats that attract pest predators. ADM’s Iowa Field to Market project works with growers to adopt the use of cover crops that also reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve soil health, and reduce water runoff.
Our new goal to reduce absolute Scope 3 emissions by 25% from a 2019 baseline by 2035 will require an intensified effort to drive the adoption of cover crop planting. As ADM strives to meet its Scope 3 goal by enrolling hundreds of thousands of acres in cover crop programs, we believe ADM will contribute to the reduction of pesticide usage globally.
ADM is extensively committed to efforts to educate, influence, and provide incentives to farmers to farm sustainably, and committed to sourcing commodities responsibly. ADM maintains the highest standards with respect to food quality and safety. ADM believes that focusing a disproportionate amount of time and resources on an effort to quantify the usage of pesticides on hundreds of thousands of farms globally will detract from our ability to achieve our sustainability goals as a whole. Moreover, such quantification is subject to the willingness of farmers to provide such information voluntarily and accurately and would not prove to be a useful management tool for farmers or ADM, nor would it provide an accurate assessment of pesticide usage in ADM’s supply chains for public understanding.
We believe that ADM should have the flexibility to further develop its policies and practices in a manner that the Company considers to be the most effective and efficient. We have conducted and published a materiality assessment in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative methodology to monitor and ensure strategic focus of our initiatives; the materiality assessment has not identified pesticide usage as a material issue with respect to the Company. We believe that our existing robust public disclosures about our sustainable farming programs, responsible sourcing policies, and responsible approaches to pest management together address the concerns raised in the proposal. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote AGAINST this stockholder proposal. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify a different choice.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING PESTICIDE USAGE.
Submission of Stockholder Proposals and Other Matters
Deadline for Submission of Stockholder Proposals
Proposals of stockholders, including nominations for director, intended to be presented at the next annual meeting and desired to be included in our proxy statement for that meeting must be received by the company’sCompany’s Corporate Secretary, addressed to ADM, Attn: Secretary, 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4600, Chicago, Illinois 60601, no later than November 22, 2022,December 11, 2024, and, in the case of nominations for director, no earlier than October 23, 2022,November 11, 2024, in order to be included in such proxy statement. These proposals and nominations must also meet all the relevant requirements of our bylaws in order to be included in our proxy statement. Generally, if written notice
Notice of anya stockholder proposal intended to be presented at the next annual meeting, andbut not included in our proxy statement for that meeting, is notmust be delivered to the Secretary at the above address between January 23, 2025 and February 4, 2023 and March 6, 202322, 2025 (or, if the next annual meeting is called for a date that is not within the period from April 5, 202323, 2025 to June 4, 2023, if22, 2025, such notice is not somust be delivered by the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of the date on which notice of the date of such annual meeting is mailedgiven or public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting is made), or if such. The notice does not containmust set forth the information required by Section 1.4(c)our bylaws.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements, in order to comply with the universal proxy rules, a stockholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of our bylaws,director nominees for election at the chair of thenext annual meeting, may declareother than the Company’s nominees, must provide notice that such stockholder proposal be disregarded.sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 24, 2025.
STOCKHOLDERS WITH THE SAME ADDRESSStockholders with the Same Address
Individual stockholders sharing an address with one or more other stockholders may elect to “household” the mailing of the proxy statement and our annual report. This means that only one annual report and proxy statement will be sent to that address unless one or more stockholders at that address specifically elect to receive separate mailings. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Also, householding will not affect dividend check mailings. We will promptly send a separate annual report and proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address on request. Stockholders with a shared address may also request us to send separate annual reports and proxy statements in the future, or to send a single copy in the future if we are currently sending multiple copies to the same address.
Requests related to householding should be made in writing and addressed to Investor Relations, ADM, 4666 Faries Parkway, Decatur, Illinois 62526-5666, or by calling our Investor Relations at 217-424-5656. If you are a stockholder whose shares are held by a bank, broker, or other nominee, you can request information about householding from your bank, broker, or other nominee.
OTHER MATTERSReceiving Future Proxy Materials Electronically
Stockholders can elect to view future proxy statements and annual reports over the Internet instead of receiving copies in the mail. Taking this step will save the Company the cost of producing and mailing these documents. You can:
| • | follow the instructions provided on your proxy card, voting instruction card or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials; or |
| • | go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions provided |
If you choose to receive future proxy statements and annual reports over the Internet, you will receive an email message next year containing the Internet address to access future proxy statements and annual reports. This email will include instructions for voting over the Internet. If you have not elected electronic delivery, you will receive either printed materials in the mail or a notice indicating that the proxy solicitation materials are available at www.proxyvote.com.
| 86 | ADM Proxy Statement 2024 |
| SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND OTHER MATTERS — Principal Holders of Voting Securities |
Principal Holders of Voting Securities
Based upon filings with the SEC, we believe that the following stockholders are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock shares:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Amount | Percent of Class | ||||||||
The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355 | 60,505,871 | (1) | 12.06 | |||||||
BlackRock, Inc. 50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001 | 45,312,186 | (2) | 9.03 | |||||||
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and related entities One State Farm Plaza, Bloomington, IL 61710 | 34,018,681 | (3) | 6.78 | |||||||
State Street Corporation One Congress Street, Suite 1, Boston, MA 02114 | 30,944,674 | (4) | 6.17 | |||||||
| (1) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024, The Vanguard Group has sole dispositive power with respect to 58,183,949 shares, shared voting power with respect to 708,988 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,312,922 shares. |
| (2) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2024, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 40,654,339 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 45,312,186 shares. |
| (3) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2024, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and related entities have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 33,884,596 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 134,085 shares. |
| (4) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 25, 2024, State Street Corporation has shared voting power with respect to 21,742,455 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 30,911,722 shares. |
Other Matters
It is not contemplated or expected that any business other than that pertaining to the subjects referred to in this proxy statement will be brought up for action at the meeting, but in the event that other business does properly come before the meeting calling for a stockholders’ vote, the named proxies will vote thereon according to their best judgment in the interest of our company.Company.
By Order of the Board of Directors
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY
D. C. Findlay,Regina B. Jones, Corporate Secretary
March 22, 2022April 10, 2024
| ADM Proxy Statement |
Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
DEFINITION AND RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES
We use Adjusted ROIC to mean “Adjusted ROIC Earnings” divided by “Adjusted Invested Capital.”Capital”. Adjusted ROIC Earnings is the Company’s net earnings attributable to controlling interests adjusted for the after-tax effects of interest expense and specified items. Adjusted Invested Capital is the average of quarter-end amounts for the trailing four quarters, with each such quarter-end amount being equal to the sum of the Company’s equity (excluding noncontrolling interests), interest-bearing liabilities, and the after-tax effect of specified items. Management uses Adjusted ROIC to measure the Company’s performance by comparing Adjusted ROIC to the Company’s weighted average cost of capital, or WACC.capital.
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, adjusted for specified items. Adjusted EPS is defined as diluted Earnings Per Share adjusted for the effects on reported diluted EPS of certain specified items. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS are useful measures of the Company’s performance because they provide investors additional information about the Company’s operations allowing better evaluation of underlying business performance and better period-to-period comparability.
Adjusted economic value added (EVA)Segment operating profit is the Company’s economic value added adjusted forconsolidated income from operations before income tax excluding corporate items. Adjusted segment operating profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, is segment operating profit excluding specified items. The Company calculates EVA by comparing ADM’sManagement believes that segment operating profit and adjusted ROIC to its Annual WACC multiplied by adjusted invested capital.
Revenue on a constant currency basis, referred to as “FX adjusted revenue” in this Annex A, issegment operating profit are useful measures of the Company’s GAAP revenue adjusted forperformance because they provide investors information about the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company calculates FX adjusted revenue by converting its current period non-USD revenue to USD using the prior period exchange rates. Management believes providing FX adjusted revenue provides valuable supplemental information regarding its revenue and facilitates period-to-period comparison. FX adjusted revenue is a non-GAAP measure and is not intended to replace or be an alternative to GAAP revenue, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.Company’s business unit performance excluding corporate overhead costs as well as specified items.
Adjusted ROIC, Adjusted ROIC Earnings, Adjusted Invested Capital, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EPS, adjusted EVA, and FX adjusted revenueAdjusted Segment Operating Profit are non-GAAP financial measures and are not intended to replace or be alternatives to GAAP financial measures. The following tables present the calculation of Adjusted ROIC and reconciliations of Adjusted ROIC Earnings to net earnings attributable to controlling interests,ADM, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP; of Adjusted Invested Capital to Total Shareholders’ Equity, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP; of Adjusted EBITDA to net earnings before income taxes,attributable to ADM, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP; of Adjusted EPS to diluted EPS, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP; and of FX adjusted revenue to GAAP revenue; and the calculations of Adjusted EVASegment Operating Profit and Adjusted Segment Operating Profit to earnings before income taxes, the most directly comparable amount reported under GAAP.
ADJUSTED ROIC for the period ended December 31, 2021.(1) CALCULATION (YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31)
2023—Adjusted ROIC Earnings $4,118* ÷ Adjusted Invested Capital $33,843* = 12.2%
2022—Adjusted ROIC Earnings $4,732* ÷ Adjusted Invested Capital $34,756* = 13.6%
2021—Adjusted ROIC Earnings $3,158* ÷ Adjusted Invested Capital $31,634* = 10.0%
2020—Adjusted ROIC Earnings $2,260* ÷ Adjusted Invested Capital $29,410* = 7.7%
| * |
|
|
|
|
*in millions
| ADM Proxy Statement |
| ANNEX A — Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures |
Annex A
Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
ADJUSTED ROIC EARNINGS(1) (IN MILLIONS) | Quarter Ended | Four Quarters Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Four Quarters Ended | Four Quarters Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADJUSTED ROIC EARNINGS(1) (IN MILLIONS) | Mar 31, 2023 | Jun 30, 2023 | Sep 30, 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 31, 2021 | Jun 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to ADM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to ADM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to ADM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to ADM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to ADM | $689 | $712 | $526 | $782 | $2,709 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 87 | 40 | 61 | 77 | 265 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specified items | 99 | 95 | 39 | 66 | 299 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specified items | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specified items | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specified items | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specified items | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total adjustments | 186 | 135 | 100 | 143 | 564 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax on adjustments | (45) | (32) | (24) | (14) | (115) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax on adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax on adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax on adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax on adjustments | (26 | ) | (52 | ) | (40 | ) | (38 | ) | (156 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net adjustments | 141 | 103 | 76 | 129 | 449 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted ROIC Earnings | $830 | $815 | $602 | $911 | $3,158 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted ROIC Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted ROIC Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted ROIC Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted ROIC Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ADJUSTED INVESTED CAPITAL(1) (IN MILLIONS) | Quarter Ended | Trailing Four Quarter Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Mar 31, 2021 | Jun 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ Equity(2) | $20,841 | $21,582 | $21,969 | $22,477 | $21,717 | ||||||||||||||||||||
+ Interest-bearing liabilities(3) | 11,208 | 9,729 | 8,941 | 9,546 | 9,856 | ||||||||||||||||||||
+ Specified items | 74 | 72 | 29 | 70 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted Invested Capital | $32,123 | $31,383 | $30,939 | $32,093 | $31,634 | ||||||||||||||||||||
ADJUSTED ROIC EARNINGS(1) (IN MILLIONS) | Year Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to ADM | $ | 4,340 | $ | 2,709 | $ | 1,772 | |||||||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest expense | 396 | 265 | 339 | ||||||||||||
LIFO | 0 | 0 | (91 | ) | |||||||||||
Specified items | 113 | 299 | 412 | ||||||||||||
Total adjustments | 509 | 564 | 660 | ||||||||||||
Tax on adjustments | (117 | ) | (115 | ) | (172 | ) | |||||||||
Net adjustments | 392 | 449 | 488 | ||||||||||||
Total Adjusted ROIC Earnings | $ | 4,732 | $ | 3,158 | $ | 2,260 | |||||||||
| Twelve Months Ended Dec 31 | |||||||||||||||
ADJUSTED EBITDA(1) (IN MILLIONS) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes | $3,313 | $1,883 | $1,588 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 265 | 339 | 402 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 996 | 976 | 993 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA | 4,574 | 3,198 | 2,983 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||
(Gains) losses on sales of assets and businesses | (77) | (90) | 89 | ||||||||||||
Asset impairment, restructuring, and settlement charges | 300 | 92 | 305 | ||||||||||||
Railroad maintenance expense | 67 | 138 | 51 | ||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | 36 | 409 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses | 7 | 4 | 17 | ||||||||||||
LIFO charge (credit) | 0 | (91) | 37 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $4,907 | $3,660 | $3,482 | ||||||||||||
Reserve, Louisiana facility adjustment | (27) | 0 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA excluding Reserve, Louisiana facility adjustment | $4,880 | $3,660 | $3,509 | ||||||||||||
ADJUSTED INVESTED CAPITAL(1) (IN MILLIONS) | Quarter Ended | Trailing Four Quarter Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mar 31, 2023 | Jun 30, 2023 | Sep 30, 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ Equity(2) | $ | 24,860 | $ | 24,939 | $ | 25,228 | $ | 24,132 | $ | 24,790 | |||||||||||||||
+ Interest-bearing liabilities(3) | 10,512 | 8,675 | 8,346 | 8,370 | 8,976 | ||||||||||||||||||||
+ Specified items | (14 | ) | 108 | 59 | 155 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Adjusted Invested Capital | $ | 35,358 | $ | 33,722 | $ | 33,633 | $ | 32,657 | $ | 33,843 | |||||||||||||||
ADJUSTED INVESTED CAPITAL(1) (IN MILLIONS) | Trailing Four Quarter Average | ||||||||||||||
| | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||
Shareholders’ Equity(2) | $ | 24,099 | $ | 21,717 | $ | 19,392 | |||||||||
+ Interest-bearing liabilities(3) | 10,634 | 9,856 | 9,943 | ||||||||||||
+ Specified items | 23 | 61 | 75 | ||||||||||||
Total Adjusted Invested Capital | $ | 34,756 | $ | 31,634 | $ | 29,410 | |||||||||
| A-2 | | ADM Proxy Statement |
| ANNEX A — Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures |
| Twelve Months Ended Dec 31 | |||||||||||||||
ADJUSTED EBITDA(1) (IN MILLIONS) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to ADM | $ | 3,483 | $ | 4,340 | $ | 2,709 | |||||||||
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests | (17 | ) | 25 | 26 | |||||||||||
Income taxes | 828 | 868 | 578 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 430 | 396 | 265 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,059 | 1,028 | 996 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA | 5,783 | 6,657 | 4,574 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
(Gains) losses on sales of assets and businesses | (17 | ) | (44 | ) | (77 | ) | |||||||||
Asset impairment, restructuring, and net settlement contingencies | 367 | 148 | 300 | ||||||||||||
Railroad maintenance expense | 67 | 67 | 67 | ||||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | 0 | 0 | 36 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses | 7 | 2 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 6,207 | $ | 6,830 | $ | 4,907 | |||||||||
Reserve, Louisiana facility adjustment | 0 | 0 | (27 | ) | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA excluding Reserve, Louisiana facility adjustment | $ | 6,207 | $ | 6,830 | $ | 4,880 | |||||||||
| Twelve Months Ended Dec 31 | ||||||||||
ADJUSTED EPS(1) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
EPS (fully diluted) as reported | $ | 6.43 | $ | 7.71 | ||||||
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gains on sales of assets and businesses | (0.03 | ) | (0.06 | ) | ||||||
Asset impairment, restructuring, and net settlement contingencies | 0.57 | 0.21 | ||||||||
Gain on debt conversion option | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition-related expenses | 0.01 | 0.00 | ||||||||
Tax adjustments | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||||
Adjusted EPS | $ | 6.98 | $ | 7.85 | ||||||
| ADM Proxy Statement 2024 | A-3 |
| ANNEX A — Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures |
Annex A
Definition and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
| Twelve Months Ended Dec 31 | ||||
ADJUSTED EPS(1) | 2021 | 2020 | ||
EPS (fully diluted) as reported | $4.79 | $3.15 | ||
Adjustments: | ||||
Gains on sales of assets and businesses | (0.10) | (0.14) | ||
Asset impairment, restructuring, and settlement charges | 0.42 | 0.12 | ||
Loss on debt extinguishment | 0.05 | 0.55 | ||
(Gain) loss on debt conversion option | (0.03) | �� | 0.03 | |
Acquisition-related expenses | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
Tax adjustments | 0.05 | (0.01) | ||
LIFO credit | 0.00 | (0.12) | ||
Adjusted EPS | $5.19 | $3.59 | ||
| Twelve Months Ended Dec 31 | ||||||||||
ADJUSTED SEGMENT OPERATING PROFIT(1) (IN MILLIONS) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
Earnings Before Income Taxes | $ | 4,294 | $ | 5,233 | ||||||
Corporate Results | 1,606 | 1,316 | ||||||||
Segment Operating Profit | 5,900 | 6,549 | ||||||||
Specified items: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gain on sale of assets | (17 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||
Impairment, restructuring, and net settlement contingencies | 361 | 147 | ||||||||
Adjusted Segment Operating Profit | $ | 6,244 | $ | 6,649 | ||||||
Ag Services and Oilseeds | $ | 4,067 | $ | 4,401 | ||||||
Ag Services | 1,168 | 1,374 | ||||||||
Crushing | 1,290 | 1,636 | ||||||||
Refined Products and Other | 1,306 | 837 | ||||||||
Wilmar | 303 | 554 | ||||||||
Carbohydrate Solutions | $ | 1,375 | $ | 1,413 | ||||||
Starches and Sweeteners | 1,329 | 1,376 | ||||||||
Vantage Corn Processors | 46 | 37 | ||||||||
Nutrition | $ | 427 | $ | 668 | ||||||
Human Nutrition | 417 | 557 | ||||||||
Animal Nutrition | 10 | 111 | ||||||||
Other Business | $ | 375 | $ | 167 | ||||||
NUTRITION REVENUE (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS) | ||||
| FY 2021 | Growth vs. FY 2020 | |||
GAAP Revenue | ||||
Nutrition | 6,712 | 15.7% | ||
Human Nutrition | 3,189 | 13.4% | ||
Animal Nutrition | 3,523 | 17.9% | ||
FX Adjusted Revenue(1) | ||||
Nutrition | 6,619 | 14.1% | ||
Human Nutrition | 3,143 | 11.8% | ||
Animal Nutrition | 3,476 | 16.3% | ||
| (1) | Non-GAAP measure: The Company uses certain “Non-GAAP” financial measures as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
(1) Non-GAAP measure: The Company uses certain “Non-GAAP” financial measures as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. These are measures of performance not defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and should be considered in addition to, not in lieu of, GAAP reported measures.
| (a) | Adjusted Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is Adjusted ROIC Earnings divided by Adjusted Invested Capital. Adjusted ROIC Earnings is ADM’s net earnings adjusted for the after-tax effects of interest expense and specified items. Adjusted Invested Capital is the sum of ADM’s equity (excluding noncontrolling interests), interest-bearing liabilities, and the after-tax effect of specified items. |
| (b) | Specified items are comprised of charges of |
| (c) | Gain on debt conversion of |
|
| (d) |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA adjusted for certain specified items as described above and railroad maintenance expense. |
Adjusted EPS is diluted EPS adjusted for certain specified items as described above. |
|
(2) Excludes noncontrolling interests
(3) Includes short-term debt, current maturities of long-term debt, finance lease obligations, and long-term debt
| (2) | Excludes noncontrolling interests. |
| (3) | Includes short-term debt, current maturities of long-term debt, finance lease obligations, and long-term debt. |
| A-4 | ADM Proxy Statement |
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY
ATTN: LORI GRAHAM
4666 FARIES PARKWAY
DECATUR, IL 62526
SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 202222, 2024 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 2, 202220, 2024 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2024 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 202222, 2024 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 2, 202220, 2024 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN PERSON
The Iridium Room on the first floor of ADM’s Global Headquarters located at 77 W. Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60601 on May 5, 2022. See the instructions in the proxy statement for more details on how to vote in person.
BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: V42191-P07621-Z87124 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE “FOR” PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3, AND “AGAINST” PROPOSAL 4. 1. Election of Directors: Nominees: For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 1a. M.S. Burke 1b. T. Colbert 1c. J.C. Collins, Jr. 1d. T.K. Crews 1e. E. de Brabander 1f. S.F. Harrison 1g. J.R. Luciano 1h. P.J. Moore 1i. D.A. Sandler 1j. L.Z. Schlitz 1k. K.R. Westbrook 2. Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. 3. Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2024. 4. Stockholder Proposal Regarding an Independent Board Chairman. In their discretion, upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting. Note: Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on this Proxy Card, and date it. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, guardian, administrator, trustee, officer of corporation or other entity or in another representative capacity, please give the full title under the signature. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on May 5, 2022.
23, 2024. The 20222024 Proxy Statement and 20212023 Form 10-K for this meeting are available at:
www.proxyvote.com
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
D72006-P69833-Z82087
V42192-P07621-Z87124 ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 5, 2022
23, 2024 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY.
The undersigned holder of Common Stock of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, revoking all proxies heretofore given, hereby appoints J.R. Luciano, D.E. FelsingerT.K. Crews, and P.J. Moore as Proxies, with the full power of substitution, to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all the shares of the undersigned held of record on March 14, 2022,April 4, 2024, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually at the Iridium Room on the first floor of ADM’s Global Headquarters located at 77 W. Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60601www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADM2024 on Thursday, May 5, 202223, 2024 at 8:3000 a.m., Central Daylight Time, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.
This card also provides your instructions for voting any shares that you may hold in the Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan. This card provides instructions to the savings plan trustee for voting those shares. To allow suffcientsufficient time for the savings plan trustee to tabulate the vote of the savings plan shares, you must vote by telephone, internet or return this card in the enclosed envelope so that your vote is received by May 2, 2022.
20, 2024. This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed on the reverse side. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” Proposals 1, 2 and 3, and “AGAINST” Proposals 4 and 5.Proposal 4. The votes entitled to be cast by the Proxy holder will be cast in the discretion of the Proxy holder on any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.